Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2014; 20(27): 9055-9071
Published online Jul 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i27.9055
Published online Jul 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i27.9055
Table 1 Studies of the association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and markers of atherosclerosis in children and adolescents
Ref. | Study population and sample size | Diagnosis | Outcome | Main results |
Schwimmer et al[21] | Children (n = 817) who died of external causes from 1993 to 2003; 15% with NAFLD | Autoptic liver biopsy | Atherosclerosis was assessed as absent, mild (aorta only), moderate (coronary artery streaks/plaques), or severe (coronary artery narrowing) | For the entire cohort, mild atherosclerosis was present in 21% and moderate to severe in 2%. Atherosclerosis was significantly more common in children with fatty liver than those without (30% vs 19%, P < 0.001) |
Schwimmer et al[9] | Overweight children with (n = 150), and without (n = 150) NAFLD, matched for gender, age, and severity of obesity | Liver biopsy | Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (abdominal obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, IR, and glucose abnormalities) | NAFLD was strongly associated with multiple cardiovascular risk factors independently of both BMI and hyperinsulinemia |
Pacifico et al[22] | Obese children with (n = 29), and without NAFLD (n = 33); healthy lean controls (n = 30) | Liver ultrasound | cIMT, mean (95%CI) | NAFLD vs no NAFLD and controls: 0.58 (0.54-0.62) mm vs 0.49 (0.46-0.52) mm and 0.40 (0.36-0.43) mm; P < 0.01 and P < 0.0005, respectively Log cIMT was associated with NAFLD severity in a multiple linear regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, Tanner stage, and cardiovascular risk factors Coefficient b, 0.08; P < 0.0005 |
Demircioğlu et al[23] | Obese children with mild (n = 32), moderate-severe NAFLD (n = 22), and without NAFLD (n = 26); healthy lean controls (n = 30) matched for age and gender | Liver ultrasound | cIMT, mean ± SD | All obese vs controls: |
Left CCA, 0.414 ± 0.071 mm vs 0.352 ± 0.054 mm, P < 0.0001 | ||||
Left CB, 0.412 ± 0.067 mm vs 0.350 ± 0.058 mm, P < 0.0001 | ||||
Left ICA, 0.324 ± 0.068 mm vs 0.266 ± 0.056 mm, P < 0.0001 | ||||
NAFLD was significantly associated with left CCA, CB, ICA in multiple regression linear analyses adjusted for age, gender, weight, mean ALT level, TC, obesity, and grade of hepatosteatosis | ||||
CCA = standardized β, 0.451; P = 0.01 | ||||
CB = standardized β, 0.627; P < 0.0001 | ||||
ICA = standardized β, 0.501; P = 0.020 | ||||
Kelishadi et al[24] | Obese adolescents with (n = 25), and without (n = 25) components of MetS; normal weight adolescents with (n = 25) and without (n = 25) components of MetS | Liver ultrasound and elevated ALT | cIMT, mean ± SD | NWMN vs NWMA vs POMN vs POMA: 0.29 ± 0.02 mm vs 0.37 ± 0.04 mm vs 0.41 ± 0.05 mm; the differences were significant between groups with the exception of NWMA vs POMN |
cIMT was significantly associated with NAFLD in a logistic regression analysis after adjustment for age, gender and pubertal status | ||||
Odds ratio, 1.2 (95%CI: 1.03-2.1) | ||||
Manco et al[25] | Overweight and obese children with (n = 31), and without (n = 49) NAFLD, matched for age, gender, and BMI | Liver biopsy | cIMT, median (IQR) | NAFLD vs no NAFLD: |
Right cIMT, 0.47 (0.07) mm vs 0.48 (0.05) mm, P = 0.659 | ||||
Left cIMT, 0.49 (0.12) mm vs 0.47 (0.05) mm, P = 0.039 | ||||
NAFLD was not associated with cIMT in a multivariate analysis | ||||
Caserta et al[26] | Randomly selected adolescents (n = 642) of whom 30.5% and 13.5% were, respectively, overweight and obese. Overall prevalence of NAFLD, 12.5% | Liver ultrasound | cIMT, mean (95%CI) | NAFLD vs no NAFLD: 0.417 (0.409-0.425) mm vs 0.395 (0.392-0.397) mm, P < 0.001 |
NAFLD was significantly associated with cIMT in a multivariate analysis after adjustment for age, BP, BMI, TG, c-HDL, TC, IR, MetS, grade of steatosis | ||||
Standardized β, 0.0147 (95%CI: 0.0054-0.0240); P = 0.002 | ||||
Pacifico et al[14] | Obese children with (n = 100), and without (n = 150) NAFLD; healthy lean controls (n = 150) | Liver ultrasound and elevated ALT | cIMT and FMD, mean (95%CI) | Controls and no NAFLD vs NAFLD: cIMT, 0.47 (0.46-0.48) mm and 0.52 (0.50-0.54) mm vs 0.55 (0.53-0.54) mm, P < 0.0001 and P < 0.01, respectively |
FMD, 15.0 (13.9-17.3) and 11.8 (10.1-13.7) vs 6.7 (5.0-8.6) %, P < 0.01 and P < 0.001 respectively | ||||
NAFLD was associated with low FMD and increased cIMT in a multiple logistic regression analysis after adjustment for age, gender, Tanner stage, and MetS | ||||
Odds ratio, 2.31 (95%CI: 1.35-3.97); P = 0.002 and 1.99 (95%CI: 1.18-3.38); P = 0.010, respectively | ||||
Nobili et al[27] | Children with NAFLD (n = 118) | Liver biopsy | Atherogenic lipid profile (TG/HDL-c, TC/HDL-c and LDL-c/HDL-c ratios) | The severity of liver injury was strongly associated with a more atherogenic profile, independently of BMI, insulin resistance, and the presence of MetS |
Weghuber et al[28] | Obese children with (n = 14), and without (n = 14) NAFLD | Proton MR spectroscopy | FMD, mean ± SD | NAFLD vs no NAFLD: 108.6% ± 11.8% vs 110.7% ± 9.0%; P = 0.41 |
El-Koofy et al[29] | Overweight/obese children (n = 33) | Liver biopsy | Atherogenic lipid profile (TC, LDL-c, HDL-c, TG) | Children with NAFLD had significantly higher TC, LDL-c, TG and lower HDL-c compared to patients with normal liver histology (P < 0.05) |
Sert et al[30] | Obese children with (n = 44), and without (n = 36) NAFLD; lean subjects (n = 37) | Liver ultrasound and elevated ALT | cIMT, mean ± SD | Lean and no NAFLD vs NAFLD: 0.0359 ± 0.012 mm vs 0.378 ± 0.017 mm vs 0.440 ± 0.026 mm, P < 0.05 and P < 0.05, respectively |
Akın et al[31] | Obese children with (n = 56), and without (n = 101) NAFLD | Liver ultrasound | cIMT, mean (95%CI) | NAFLD vs no NAFLD: 0.48 (0.47-0.49) mm vs 0.45 (0.44-0.45) mm, P < 0.001 |
NAFLD was the only variable associated with increased cIMT in a multiple regression adjusted for age and gender | ||||
β, 0.031 [SE (β) = 0.008]; P < 0.001 | ||||
Gökçe et al[32] | Obese children with (n = 50), and without (n = 30) NAFLD; healthy lean controls (n = 30) | Liver ultrasound | cIMT, mean ± SD | NAFLD vs no NAFLD vs control group: |
Right cIMT, 0.46 ± 0.21 mm vs 0.35 ± 0.09 mm vs 0.30 ± 0.13 mm, P < 0.01 | ||||
Left cIMT, 0.44 ± 0.09 mm vs 0.35 ± 0.08 mm vs 0.27 ± 0.04 mm, P < 0.01 | ||||
NAFLD was the only variable associated with increased cIMT in a multiple regression adjusted for age, gender, BMI, BP, TG, HDL-c, IR and MetS | ||||
Right cIMT = β, 0.241; P < 0.05 | ||||
Left cIMT = β, 0.425; P < 0.01 | ||||
Sert et al[33] | Obese children with (n = 97), and without (n = 83) NAFLD; lean subjects (n = 68) | Liver ultrasound and elevated ALT | cIMT, mean ± SD | Lean and no NAFLD vs NAFLD: 0.354 ± 0.009 mm vs 0.383 ± 0.019 mm vs 0.437 ± 0.028 mm; P < 0.05 and P < 0.05, respectively |
Alp et al[34] | Obese children with (n = 93), and without (n = 307) NAFLD; healthy lean controls (n = 150) | Liver ultrasound | cIMT, mean ± SD | Severe NAFLD vs mild NAFLD vs no NAFLD vs controls: 0.09 ± 0.01 cm vs 0.10 ± 0.01 cm vs 0.09 ± 0.01 cm vs 0.06 ± 0.01 cm, P < 0.001 |
Huang et al[35] | Adolescents (n = 964) | Liver ultrasound | PWV, mean ± SD | No NAFLD, low metabolic risk vs NAFLD, low metabolic risk vs no NAFLD, high metabolic risk vs NAFLD, high metabolic risk: males, 6.6 ± 0.7 m/s vs 6.7 ± 0.6 m/s vs 6.9 ± 1.0 m/s; females, 6.2 ± 0.7 m/s vs 6.3 ± 0.7 m/s vs 6.5 ± 0.7 m/s vs 6.4 ± 0.6 m/s |
Males and females who had NAFLD in the presence of the metabolic cluster had greater PWV | ||||
b, 0.20 (95%CI: 0.01-0.38); P = 0.037 | ||||
Jin et al[36] | Obese children (n = 71), and healthy controls (n = 47) | Liver ultrasound | PWV, mean ± SD | Obese vs controls: 4.54 ± 0.66 m/s vs 3.70 ± 0.66 m/s, P < 0.001 |
Fatty liver was positively correlated with PWV (P < 0.01) |
Table 2 Studies of the association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and alterations in cardiac structure and function in the adult population
Ref. | Study population and sample size | Diagnosis | Outcomes | Main results |
Lautamäki et al[15] | T2DM and coronary artery disease patients with (n = 27), and without (n = 28) fatty liver. The 2 groups were matched for age, BMI, and fasting plasma glucose | Hepatic MRS | Myocardial insulin resistance and perfusion (PET) | In patients with T2DM and coronary artery disease, liver fat is an indicator of myocardial insulin resistance and reduced coronary functional capacity |
Goland et al[17] | Nondiabetic, normotensive patients with NAFLD (n = 38), and age and gender-matched controls (n = 25) | Liver ultrasound and liver biopsy in a subgroup of 11 NAFLD patients | LV structure and function (M-mode echocardiography; and pulsed Doppler echocardiography) | Patients with NAFLD had mild changes in cardiac geometry (thickening of the interventricular septum and posterior wall, and increased LV mass) as well as significant differences in parameters of diastolic function compared with the control group |
Perseghin et al[16] | Young nondiabetic men matched for anthropometric features with (n = 21) or without (n = 21) fatty liver | MRS | LV morphology and function; Intrapericardial and extrapericardial fat content; and resting LV energy metabolism (Cardiac MRI and cardiac 31P-MRS) | Newly found young individuals with fatty liver had excessive fat accumulation in the epicardial area and abnormal LV energy metabolism despite normal LV morphological features and systolic and diastolic functions |
Fallo et al[45] | Never-treated essential hypertensive patients with (n = 48) or without (n = 38) fatty liver. The 2 groups were similar as to gender, age and blood pressure levels | Liver ultrasound | LV structure and function (M-mode echocardiography; and pulsed Doppler echocardiography) | NAFLD patients had similar prevalence of LV hypertrophy compared to subjects without NAFLD, but a higher prevalence of LV diastolic dysfunction |
Rijzewijk et al[46] | T2DM patients with (n = 32) and without (n = 29) fatty liver | MRS | Cardiac perfusion and substrate metabolism; LV morphology and function (PET, cardiac MRI and cardiac 31P-MRS) | T2DM patients with fatty liver showed decreased myocardial perfusion, glucose uptake, high-energy phosphate metabolism compared with similar patients without hepatic steatosis |
Fotbolcu et al[18] | Nondiabetic, normotensive patients with NAFLD (n = 35) and control subjects (n = 30). The 2 groups were similar as to gender and age | Liver ultrasound | LV structure and function (M-mode echocardiography; Pulsed and Tissue Doppler echocardiography) | Patients with NAFLD had changes in cardiac geometry (thickening of the interventricular septum and posterior wall, and increased LV mass) as well as significant differences in parameters of systolic and diastolic function compared with the control group |
Bonapace et al[47] | T2DM patients with (n = 32) and without (n = 18) fatty liver. The 2 groups were similar as to gender, age, BMI, waist circumference, and diabetes duration | Liver ultrasound | LV structure and function (M-mode echocardiography; Pulsed and Tissue Doppler echocardiography) | T2DM patients with fatty liver showed LV diastolic dysfunction, even if the LV morphology and systolic function were preserved |
Mantovani et al[48] | Hypertensive T2DM patients with (n = 59) and without (n = 57) fatty liver | Liver ultrasound | LV structure (M-mode echocardiography) | Hypertensive T2DM patients with NAFLD have a remarkably higher frequency of LV hypertrophy than hypertensive diabetic patients without NAFLD |
Hallsworth et al[49] | Adult subjects matched for anthropometric features with (n = 19) or without (n = 19) fatty liver | MRS | Cardiac structure, function, and metabolism (cardiac MRI, cardiac tagging, and cardiac 31P-MRS) | The major findings in NAFLD patients compared to controls were: thickening of the cardiac wall, independent of changes in LV mass; altered myocardial strains; concentric remodeling; evidence of diastolic dysfunction; but no significant difference in cardiac energetics |
Karabay et al[50] | NAFLD patients (n = 55) and healthy controls (n = 21; normal laboratory values and liver ultrasound) | Liver biopsy | LV structure and function (M-mode echocardiography; Pulsed and Tissue Doppler echocardiography; and speckle tracking echocardiography) | Patients with NAFLD had changes in cardiac geometry (thickening of the interventricular septum and posterior wall, and increased LV mass) as well as significant differences in parameters of diastolic function compared with the control group |
LV global longitudinal strain and strain rate in systole were lower in NAFLD group as compared to controls; however no significant differences were found among NAFLD groups (i.e., simple steatosis, borderline NASH, and definite NASH) |
Table 3 Studies of the association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and alterations in cardiac structure and function in children and adolescents
Ref. | Study population and sample size | Diagnosis | Outcomes | Main results |
Sert et al[30] | Obese adolescents with (n = 44), and without (n = 36) NAFLD; and control subjects (n = 37) | Liver ultrasound and elevated serum alanine aminotransferase | LV structure (M-mode echocardiography) | Increased LV mass was found in NAFLD group compared to both lean controls and obese subjects without NAFLD |
Alp et al[34] | Obese children and adolescents with (n = 93), and without (n = 307) NAFLD matched for gender and age; and control subjects (n = 150) | Liver ultrasound | LV structure and function; Epicardial fat (M-mode echocardiography; Pulsed and Tissue Doppler echocardiography) | Increased end-systolic thickness of the interventricular septum, and larger LV mass, as well as LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction were found in NAFLD group. In addition, obese children with NAFLD had increased epicardial fat thickness |
Singh et al[51] | Obese children and adolescents with (n = 15), and without (n = 15) NAFLD matched for age, gender, Tanner stage, and BMI z score; and control subjects (n = 15) matched for gender, age, and Tanner stage | Hepatic MRS | LV structure and function; Intracardiac triglyceride content (Integrated backscatter ultrasonography and speckle tracking echocardiography; cardiac MRS) | LV global longitudinal strain and early diastolic strain rates were significantly decreased in obese children with NAFLD compared to both lean controls and obese subjects without NAFLD. Intracardiac triglyceride content was not different among the 3 groups |
Sert et al[33] | Obese adolescents with (n = 97), and without (n = 83) NAFLD; and control subjects (n = 68) | Liver ultrasound and elevated serum alanine aminotransferase | LV structure and function (M-mode echocardiography; Pulsed and Tissue Doppler echocardiography) | Obese adolescents with NAFLD exhibited increased LV dimensions and mass, as well as LV diastolic dysfunction |
Pacifico et al[52] | Obese children and adolescents with (n = 54), and without (n = 54) NAFLD matched for age, gender, pubertal status, and BMI-SD score; and healthy control subjects (n = 18) matched for gender, age, and pubertal status | Hepatic magnetic resonance imaging; and liver biopsy in a subgroup of 41 NAFLD patients | LV structure and function; Epicardial fat (M-mode echocardiography; Pulsed and Tissue Doppler echocardiography) | Increased interventricular septum thickness at end-diastole and at end-systole, as well as LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction were found in NAFLD group. Children with more severe liver histology had worse LV dysfunction than those with more mild liver changes. NAFLD group had also increased epicardial fat thickness |
Fintini et al[53] | Children with biopsy-proven NAFLD (n = 50). No patients without NAFLD, and no healthy control children were included | Liver biopsy | LV structure and function (M-mode echocardiography; and pulsed Doppler echocardiography) | About 35% (n = 18) of the 50 children with NAFLD had LV hypertrophy. Children with NASH showed, almost invariably, the presence of clear cut LV hypertrophy |
- Citation: Pacifico L, Chiesa C, Anania C, Merulis AD, Osborn JF, Romaggioli S, Gaudio E. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the heart in children and adolescents. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(27): 9055-9071
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i27/9055.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i27.9055