Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 28, 2014; 20(24): 7971-7978
Published online Jun 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7971
Published online Jun 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7971
Table 1 Baseline information of studies included in the meta-analysis
| Ref. | No. of HCC patients | No. of controls | Year of study | Country of study |
| Unitt et al[15] | 25 | 48 | 2005 | United Kingdom |
| Ormandy et al[16] | 84 | 21 | 2005 | Germany |
| Guo et al[17] | 22 | 12 | 2006 | China |
| Fu et al[18] | 123 | 47 | 2007 | China |
| Peng et al[21] | 63 | 40 | 2007 | China |
| Yang et al[20] | 28 | 26 | 2007 | China |
| Cao et al[19] | 33 | 20 | 2007 | United States |
| Yu et al[22] | 58 | 15 | 2008 | China |
| Zhang et al[23] | 100 | 20 | 2008 | China |
| Huang et al[28] | 93 | 24 | 2010 | China |
| Kuang et al[26] | 28 | 26 | 2010 | China |
| Wang et al[27] | 46 | 32 | 2010 | China |
| Yoshizawa et al[24] | 57 | 31 | 2010 | Japan |
| Zhang et al[25] | 49 | 25 | 2010 | China |
| Thakur et al[33] | 28 | 15 | 2011 | Indian |
| 1Fan et al[30] | 138 | - | 2011 | China |
| Liu et al[32] | 40 | 28 | 2011 | China |
| Aleem et al[29] | 15 | 10 | 2011 | Egypt |
| Feng et al[31] | 42 | 15 | 2011 | China |
| Wang et al[34] | 30 | 30 | 2011 | China |
| Yang et al[37] | 60 | 20 | 2012 | China |
| Wu et al[36] | 78 | 12 | 2012 | China |
| Chen et al[35] | 39 | 30 | 2012 | China |
Table 2 Summary of odds ratios and 95%CIs in this meta-analysis
| Items | OR | Heterogeneity | ||||
| OR (95%CI) | P value | Q2 | t2 | I2(%) | P value | |
| Ciculating populations of Tregs between HCC patients and health controls | 1.868 (1.489-2.344) | 0 | 539.28 | 0.2741 | 96.1 | 0 |
| Populations of Tregs in the tumor and surrounding tissues | 4.040 (2.094-7.794) | 0 | 133.41 | 0.5250 | 97.0 | 0 |
| Populations of Tregs in the tumor and the normal liver tissues | 2.869 (2.157-3.817) | 0 | 3.77 | 0.0282 | 46.9 | 0.152 |
| Populations of Tregs among HCC patients with different tumor numbers (one tumor mass or more) | 1.670 (0.879-3.171) | 0.117 | 94.91 | 0.3138 | 97.9 | 0 |
| Populations of Tregs among HCC patients with different tumor sizes (smaller or larger than 5 cm) | 1.170 (0.844-1.620) | 0.346 | 102.41 | 0.1325 | 96.1 | 0 |
| 6 Populations of Tregs between HCC patients with or without capsule | 1.073 (0.798-1.442) | 0.642 | 61.48 | 0.0682 | 95.1 | 0 |
| Populations of Tregs among HCC patients in different TNM stages (I/II vs III/IV) | 0.646 (0.207-2.021) | 0.453 | 365.99 | 1.3338 | 99.2 | 0 |
| Populations of Tregs between HCC patients with or without HBV infection | 1.189 (0.904-1.564) | 0.216 | 45.02 | 0.0856 | 91.1 | 0 |
| Populations of Tregs among HCC patients with different AFP levels (lower or higher than 20 ng/mL) | 1.458 (0.714-2.975) | 0.3 | 143.21 | 0.3916 | 98.6 | 0 |
- Citation: Zhao HQ, Li WM, Lu ZQ, Yao YM. Roles of Tregs in development of hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(24): 7971-7978
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i24/7971.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7971
