Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 21, 2014; 20(23): 7169-7180
Published online Jun 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i23.7169
Published online Jun 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i23.7169
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients included in entecavir studies[21]
Characteristic, n (%)1 | ETV-022 | ETV-027 | Oriente | Virgil | King’s College Cohort | Italian cohort | Argentineancohort | Hong Kongcohort | Japan cohort | China cohort | China cohort 2 | Taiwan cohort | Taiwan cohort 2 | United States cohort | United States cohort 2 | Australia |
Ref. | [7] | [8] | [22] | [23] | [24] | [25[ | [29] | [32] | [33] | [34] | [35] | [36] | [37] | [38] | [39] | [40] |
n | 354 | 325 | 190 | 243 | 154 | 418 | 169 | 222 | 474 | 230 | 1768 | 98 | 248 | 169 | 136 | 163 |
Age, yr (mean ± SD or range) | 35 ± 132 | 44 ± 112 | 44 (35-54)3 | 43 ± 142 | 423 | 58 (18-82)4 | 51 ± 132 | 47 (21-77)4 | 47 (17-82)4 | 42 ± 122 | 36 (16-70)4 | 48 ± 132 | 39 (17-77)4 | 39 ± 122 | 39 ± 122 | 52 (24-86)4 |
Male | 274 (77) | 248 (76) | 139 (73) | 177 (73) | 122 (79) | 316 (76) | 113 (77) | 157 (71) | 321 (67) | 196 (85) | 1414 (80) | 67 (68) | 172 (69) | 100 (59) | 83 (61) | 113 (69) |
Race | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | |||||||||
White | 140 (40) | 193 (59) | 60 (84) | 114 (47) | 143 (85) | 7(4) | 10 (7) | |||||||||
Asian | 204 (58) | 122 (38) | 18 (9) | 70 (29) | 26 (15) | 1768 (100) | 162 (96) | 126 (93) | ||||||||
Other | 2 (< 1) | 2 (< 1) | 6 (3) | 59 (24) | ||||||||||||
Region | Europe 24%, North America 13%, South America 14%, Australia and Asia 49% | Europe 48%, North America 9%, South America 11%, Australia and Asia 33% | Europe | Europe | Europe | Europe | South America | Asia | Asia | Asia | Asia | Asia | North America | North America | Oceania | |
Genotype | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | ||||||||
A | 94 (27) | 33 (10) | 40 (22) | 12 (3) | 0 | |||||||||||
B | 68 (19) | 46 (14) | 14 (8) | 67 (16) | -61 | -57 | ||||||||||
C | 111 (31) | 57 (18) | 25 (14) | 336 (81) | -39 | -41 | ||||||||||
D | 37 (10) | 157 (48) | 91 (50) | 84 (90) | 0 (0) | 0 | ||||||||||
HBeAg negative | 6 (3) | 322 (99) | 133 (70) | 157 (65) | 106 (69) | 347 (83) | 65 (39) | 132 (59) | 252 (53) | 117 (51) | 602 (34) | 57 (58) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 10 (6.1) |
HBV DNA, log10 IU/mL1 | 9.62 (2.01)25 | 7.6 (1.8)25 | 5.94 (4.64-7.39)3 | 6.2 ± 1.73 | 4.6 (0.2)6 | 6.0 (1.5–9)4 | 6.88 (1.81)2 | 7.1 (4.0-> 8.8)4 | 6.7 (2.6-> 9.0)4 | 6.3 ± 1.43 | 6.74 (1.04-9.69)4 | 6.0 ± 1.53 | 7.6 (2.2-13.1)4 | 7.58 (3.77-9.70)4 | 7.48 (3.8-9.9)4 | NR |
ALT, IU/L1 | 140.5 (114.3)2 | 141 (114.7)2 | 71.5 (44-108)3 | NR | NR | 92 (11-2241)4 | 139 (231)2 | 92 (17-2168)4 | 70 (8-2121)4 | 68(3-2631)4 | NR | 138 (21-4190)4 | 201 (27-2415)4 | 62 (14-839)4 | 67 (14-1077)4 | NR |
Cirrhosis | 26/329 (8) | 15/303 (5) | 07 | 57 (24) | 52 (34) | 202 (49) | 38 (23) | 0 | 102 (22) | 74 (32) | NR | 13 (14) | 39 (16) | NR | NR | 26(16) |
Table 2 Summary of efficacy results from real-life studies of entecavir in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naïve patients n (%)[21]
Study | Median follow-up (range) | Patients(n) | Cut-off (assaylimit) (IU/mL) | HBV DNA undetectable1 | HBeAg seroconversion12 | HBsAg loss1 |
ORIENTE[22] | 52 wk (46-53 wk) | 190 | 50 | 115 (82) | 12 (21) | 2 (1) |
VIRGIL[23] | 19 mo (3-45 mo) | 243 | 80 | 126 (74) | 13 (15) | 3 (1) |
King’s College cohort[24] | 28 mo (NR) | 154 | 12 | NR | NR | NR |
Italian cohort[25] | 58 mo (2-80 mo) | 418 | 12 | 93 (99) | 527 (31 patients) | 337 (15 patients) |
Argentinean cohort[29] | 181 wk (108-248 wk) | 169 | 6 | 34 (100) | 71 (68) | 23 (14) |
Hong Kong cohort[32] | 3 yr (12-60 mo) | 222 | 12 | 51 (90) | 16 (53) | 1 (0.5)3 |
Japan cohort[33] | 2.37 yr (0.5-7.2 yr) | 473 | 12 | 70 (96) | 93 (42) | 1 (0.2) |
China cohort[34] | 27.5 mo (3-73 mo) | 230 | 100 | NR | 17 (15) | 1 (0.4) |
China cohort 2[35] | 191 wk (1-233 wk) | 1768 | 50 | 1327 (83) | NR | NR |
Taiwan cohort[36] | 144 wk | 98 | NR | 93 (95) | 5 (12) | 0 |
Taiwan cohort 2[37] | 25.3 mo (12-69 mo) | 248 | 6 | 33 (82) | 64 (28) | NR |
United States cohort[38] | 25 mo (6-68 mo) | 169 | 100 | 75 (44) | 12 (8) | NR |
United States cohort 2[39] | 36 mo | 136 | 100 | 115 (85) | 41 (30) | 0 |
Australia cohort[40] | 26 mo (3-46) | 163 | 12 | 134 (82) | 66 (43) | 1 (0.6) |
Table 3 Baseline characteristics of patients included in tenofovir studies n (%)[21]
Characteristic1 | Study 103 | Study 102 | King’s College Cohort | United States cohort | European cohort | German cohort |
Reference | [14] | 14 | [24] | [38] | [42] | [43] |
n | 176 | 250 | 60 | 28 | 302 | 184 |
Age, yr (mean ± SD or range) | 34 ± 112 | 44 ± 112 | 403 | 36 ± 92 | 55 (19-80) | 44 ± 142 |
Male | 119 (68) | 193 (77) | 30 (50) | 16 (58) | 222 (74) | 127 (69) |
Race | NR | NR | ||||
White | 92 (52) | 161 (64) | 1 (4) | 140 (76) | ||
Asian | 64 (36) | 63 (25) | 27 (96) | |||
Other | 20 (11) | 26 (10) | ||||
Region | Europe 55%, North America 27%, Australia and Asia 18% | Europe 63%, North America 21%, Australia and Asia 16%4 | Europe | North America | Europe | Europe |
Genotype | NR | NR | NR | |||
A | 94 (27) | 33 (10) | ||||
B | 68 (19) | 46 (14) | 18 (65) | |||
C | 111 (31) | 57 (18) | 10 (35) | |||
D | 55/173 (32) | 156/243 (64) | ||||
HBeAg negative | 0 (0) | 250 (100) | 46 (77) | 0 (0) | 241 (80) | 127 (69) |
HBV DNA, log10 IU/mL1 | 8.64 (1.076)25 | 6.86 (1.31)25 | 4.2 (0.3)6 | 7.74 (3.34-8.66)3 | 5.9 (1.4 -> 9)3 | 6.9 |
ALT, IU/L1 | 142 (102.81)2 | 127.5 (101.21)2 | NR | 52.5 (8-468)3 | 88 (11-3733)3 | |
Cirrhosis | 34/172 (20) | 47/250 (19) | 14 (23) | NR | 105 (35) | 20 (11) |
Table 4 Summary of efficacy results from real-life studies of tenofovir in nucleos(t)ide analogue-naïve patients n (%)
Study | Median follow-up (range) | Patients(n) | Cut-off (assay limit) (IU/mL) | HBV DNA undetectable1 | HBeAg seroconversion12 | HBsAg loss1 |
King’s College cohort[24] | 12 mo | 60 | 12 | 33 (76) | 2 (7) | 0 |
United States cohort[38] | 12 mo (6-23 mo) | 28 | 100 | 23 (82) | 7 (5) | 0 |
European cohort[42] | 33 mo (0-66 mo) | 302 | 12 | 91 (97) | 18 (36)3 | 8 (13) |
German cohort[43] | 24 mo | 184 | 69 | 170 (92) | NR | NR |
- Citation: Ridruejo E. Treatment of chronic hepatitis B in clinical practice with entecavir or tenofovir. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(23): 7169-7180
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i23/7169.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i23.7169