Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2014; 20(20): 6329-6335
Published online May 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6329
Published online May 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6329
Table 1 Correlation of the methylation status of fecal SFRP2 and WIF-1 genes with patients’ clinicopathological parameters n (%)
| Parameter | Case | WIF-1 | SFRP2 | WIF-1+SFRP2 | Sensitivity | Specificity | |||
| (n) | Methylation | Pvalue | Methylation | Pvalue | Methylation | Pvalue | |||
| CRC | 48 | 27 (56.3) | 0.0001 | 29 (60.4) | 0.0001 | 39 (81.3) | 0.0001 | 81.3% | |
| Gender | |||||||||
| Male | 24 | 17 (70.8) | 0.140 | 14 (58.3) | 0.771 | ||||
| Female | 24 | 12 (29.2) | 13 (54.2) | ||||||
| Age (yr) | |||||||||
| > 55 | 32 | 21 (65.6) | 0.297 | 18 (56.3) | 1.000 | ||||
| ≤ 55 | 16 | 8 (50) | 9 (56.3) | ||||||
| Tumor location | |||||||||
| Left colon | 32 | 21 (65.6) | 0.267 | 18 (56.3) | 1.000 | ||||
| Right colon | 16 | 8 (50) | 9 (56.3) | ||||||
| TNM stage | |||||||||
| A-B | 27 | 18 (66.7) | 0.315 | 15 (55.6) | 0.912 | ||||
| C-D | 21 | 11 (52.4) | 12 (57.1) | ||||||
| Lymph node metastasis | |||||||||
| Positive | 21 | 11 (52.4) | 0.315 | 12 (57.1) | 0.912 | ||||
| Negative | 27 | 18 (66.7) | 15 (55.6) | ||||||
| Distant metastasis | |||||||||
| Positive | 7 | 4 (57.1) | 0.848 | 4 (57.1) | 0.959 | ||||
| Negative | 41 | 25 (61.0) | 23 (56.1) | ||||||
| Adenoma | 35 | 18 (51.4) | 0.0001 | 16 (45.7) | 0.0001 | 23 (65.7) | 0.0001 | 65.7% | |
| Advanced | 15 | ||||||||
| Non-advanced | 20 | ||||||||
| Hyperplastic polyp | 32 | 4 (12.5) | 0.0451 | 6 (18.7) | 0.0551 | 8 (25.0) | 0.0161 | 25.0% | 96.7% |
| Normal control | 30 | 0 (0) | 1 (3.3) | 1 (3.3) | |||||
Table 2 SFRP2 and WIF-1 gene primer sequences for methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction assays
| Gene | Primer (5’-3’) | Product size (bp) | Annealing temperature (°C) |
| M: SFRP2 | GGGTCGGAGTTTTTCGGAGTTGCGC | 138 | 62 |
| CCGCTCTCTTCGCTAAATACGACTCG | (38) | ||
| U: SFRP2 | TTTTGGGTTGGAGTTTTTTGGAGTTGTGT | 145 | 52 |
| AACCCACTCTCTTCACTAAATACAACTCA | (38) | ||
| M: WIF-1 | GGGCGTTTTATTGGGCGTAT | 197 | 58 |
| AAACCAACAATCAACGAAC | (38) | ||
| U: WIF-1 | GGGTGTTTTATTGGGTGTAT | 198 | 55 |
| AAACCAACAATCAACAAAAC | (38) |
Table 3 Hypermethylation status of SFRP2 and WIF-1 in fecal DNA samples n (%)
| Group | Case | Hypermethylated genes | ||
| SFRP2 | WIF-1 | SFRP2+WIF-1 | ||
| CRC | 48 | 27 (56.3) | 29 (60.4) | 39 (81.3) |
| Dukes A-B | 27 | 15 (55.6) | 18 (66.7) | 22 (81.5) |
| Dukes A | 7 | 5 (71.4) | 4 (57.1) | 6 (85.7) |
| Dukes B | 20 | 10 (50.0) | 14 (70.0) | 16 (80.0) |
| Dukes C-D | 21 | 12 (57.1) | 11 (52.4) | 17 (81.0) |
| Dukes C | 14 | 8 (57.1) | 7 (50.0) | 10 (71.4) |
| Dukes D | 7 | 4 (57.1) | 4 (57.1) | 7 (100) |
| Adenoma | 35 | 18 (51.4) | 16 (45.7) | 23 (65.7) |
| Advanced | 15 | 9 (60.0) | 8 (53.3) | 12 (80.0) |
| Non-advanced | 20 | 8 (40.0) | 7 (35.0) | 11 (55.0) |
| Hyperplastic polyp | 32 | 4 (12.5) | 6 (18.7) | 8 (25.0) |
| Normal control | 30 | 0 (0) | 1 (3.3) | 1 (3.3) |
Table 4 Hypermethylated SFRP2 and WIF-1 genes and fecal occult blood test for the detection of colorectal tumors n (%)
| Group | n | HypermethylatedSFRP2andWIF-1 | Fecal occult blood test | Pvalue |
| CRC | 48 | 39 (81.3) | 27 (56.3) | 0.008 |
| Dukes A-B | 27 | 22 (81.5) | 14 (51.9) | 0.021 |
| Dukes A | 7 | 6 (85.7) | 2 (28.5) | 0.031 |
| Dukes B | 20 | 16 (80.0) | 12 (60.0) | 0.168 |
| Dukes C-D | 21 | 17 (81.0) | 13 (61.9) | 0.170 |
| Dukes C | 14 | 10 (71.4) | 8 (57.1) | 0.430 |
| Dukes D | 7 | 7 (100) | 5 (71.4) | 0.127 |
| Adenoma | 35 | 23 (65.7) | 9 (25.7) | < 0.001 |
| Advanced | 15 | 12 (80.0) | 5 (33.3) | 0.010 |
| Non-advanced | 20 | 11 (55.0) | 4 (20.0) | 0.022 |
| Hyperplastic polyp | 32 | 8 (25.0) | 5 (15.6) | 0.351 |
| Normal control | 30 | 1 (3.3) | 1 (3.3) | 1.000 |
- Citation: Zhang H, Zhu YQ, Wu YQ, Zhang P, Qi J. Detection of promoter hypermethylation of Wnt antagonist genes in fecal samples for diagnosis of early colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(20): 6329-6335
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i20/6329.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6329
