Review
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2014; 20(2): 475-485
Published online Jan 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i2.475
Table 1 Indexes for the prediction of liver steatosis
IndexAuthor(nation)Paper (yr)No. of subjects(fatty liver/ non-fatty liver)ParametersCutoff valuesSens-itivitySpeci-ficityAUROCDiagnostic methods for hepatic steatosis
FLIBedogni(Italy)BMC Gastroenterology (2006)228/268BMI, waist circumference, triglyceride, γGT< 30 > 6087.0%61.0%64.0%86.0%0.84US
NAFLD liver fat score1Kontronen(Finland)Gastroenterology (2009)470MetS, type II diabetes, IRI, AST, AST/ALT ratio-0.6486.0%71.0%0.8720.863MRS
HSILee (South Korea)Dig Liver Dis (2010)5362/5362 (sex- and age- matched)8 × AST/ALT ratio + BMI + (+ 2 for females, + 2 for diabetes)< 30 > 3693.1%92.4%0.812US
STPoynaud(France)Comp Hepatol(2005)744/14012 parameters40.30 0.7290%90.0%0.7920.8030.8630.723Biopsy
Park (South Korea)Korean J Hepatol(2011)145/311ALT/AST > 1.5 (= 1 point)γGT > 50 IU/L (= 1 point)TG > 150 mg/dL (= 1 point)BMI 23-24.9 (= 2 points) ≥ 25 (= 3 points)371.7%75.9%0.797US
Bajaj(India)Indian J Med Res (2009)39/82IRI +1.6 × BMI + 1.9 × FPG1.684.6%76.0%0.76US
Table 2 Pathological criteria for the diagnosis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
Criteria (yr)ClassificationsDefinitions of NASHCharacteristics
Matteoni (1999)Type 1: steatosis aloneType 2: steatosis with inflammationType 3: steatosis with hepatocyte balloningType 4: Type 3 plus MDB or fibrosisType 3 or 4Depend on the subjective judgments of observers(existence of hepatocyte balloning)Well correlation with liver-related mortalityInflammation is not included
NAS (2005)Steatosis (0-3) Inflammation (0-3) Hepatocyte balloning (0-2) Total: 0 to 8Total scores: 5 to 8Numerical scoreLow sensitivity, NAS ≥ 4 may be better Fibrosis is not includedNo significant correlation with liver-related mortality Recommended use for assessing the therapeutic effect during clinical studies
Younossi (2011)SteatosisHepatocyte balloningMDBFibrosisSteatosis + Hepatocyte balloningor + MDBor + FibrosisInflammation is not includedWell correlation with Matteoni’s classificationCan diagnose so-called burned-out NASHEssential validation study
Table 3 Scoring systems for picking up nonalcoholic steatohepatitis or severe fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
IndexNAFIC scoreNAFLDfibrosis scoreFIB4 index
ObjectPredicting NASHExcluding severe fibrosis (stage 3-4)
FormulaFerritin > 200 (female), 300 (male) ng/mL (= 1 point) Fasting insulin > 10 μU/mL (= 1 point) Type 4 collagen 7S > 5.0 ng/mL (= 2 points) Total: 0-4 points-1.675 + 0.037 × age (yr) + 0.094 × BMI (kg/m2) + 1.13 × impaired fasting glycemia /DM (yes = 1, no = 0) + 0.99 × AAR – 0.013 × PLT (× 109/L) - 0.66 × Alb (g/dL)Age (yr) × AST (IU/L)/(PLT (109/L) ×√ALT (IU/L)
Cut-off values12-1.4550.6761.302.67
Sensitivity94%166%182%151%174%33%
88%260%277%243%2
Specificity48%191%177%198%171%98%
43%287%271%296%2
Positive predictive value31%190%156%190%143%80%
66%285%252%282%2
Negative predictive value86%167%193%185%190%83%
75%264%288%280%2