Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2014; 20(15): 4244-4255
Published online Apr 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i15.4244
Published online Apr 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i15.4244
Table 1 Tumor nodes metastasis staging of rectal cancer based on the American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition
| Primary tumor (T) | |
| Tx | Primary tumor cannot be assessed |
| T0 | No evidence of primary tumor |
| Tis | Carcinoma in situ |
| T1 | Tumor invades submucosa |
| T2 | Tumor invades muscularis propria |
| T3 | Tumor invades through the muscularis propria and into perirectal tissues |
| T4a | Tumor penetrates to the surface of the visceral peritoneum |
| T4b | Tumor directly invades or is adherent to other organs or structures |
| Regional lymph nodes (N) | |
| Nx | Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed |
| N0 | No regional lymph node metastasis |
| N1 | Metastases in 1-3 regional lymph nodes |
| N1a | Metastasis in 1 regional lymph node |
| N1b | Metastases in 2-3 regional lymph nodes |
| N1c | Tumor deposit(s) in the subserosa, mesentery, pericolic, or perirectal tissues without regional nodal metastasis |
| N2 | Metastases in 4 or more regional lymph nodes |
| N2a | Metastases in 4-6 regional lymph nodes |
| N2b | Metastases in 7 or more regional lymph nodes |
| Distant metastasis (M) | |
| M0 | No distant metastasis |
| M1 | Distant metastasis |
| M1a | Metastasis confined to 1 organ or site (e.g., liver, lung, ovary, non-regional node, external iliac lymph node) |
| M1b | Metastases in > 1 organ/site or the peritoneum |
Table 2 Advantages and disadvantages of imaging modalities in preoperative staging
| Imaging modalities | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Preoperative staging | ||
| EUS | Depth of tumor invasion in early rectal cancer | Limited field of view Perirectal invasion and LN metastasis |
| CT | Wide availability Fast scanning time | Local staging and CRM involvement in lower rectal cancer |
| MRI | High soft tissue resolution Local staging and CRM involvement | Distant metastasis |
| PET/CT | Distant metastasis | Poor spatial resolution Perirectal invasion and CRM involvement |
| Post-therapeutic restaging | ||
| EUS | None | Low accuracy of T staging and LN staging |
| CT | Relatively high accuracy of CRM status | Relatively low accuracy of T staging and LN staging |
| MRI | High specificity of therapeutic response assessment High accuracy of CRM involvement | Relatively poor sensitivity |
| PET/CT | Distant metastasis | No standard parameter and follow-up protocol |
- Citation: Heo SH, Kim JW, Shin SS, Jeong YY, Kang HK. Multimodal imaging evaluation in staging of rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(15): 4244-4255
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i15/4244.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i15.4244
