Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2014; 20(14): 3825-3834
Published online Apr 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.3825
Published online Apr 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.3825
Table 1 Time trends for incidence rates for colorectal cancer in the Czech Republic and neighboring countries
Cancer registry | Colorectal cancer incidence-ASR (E) | ||||
1990 | 2000 | Trend 1990-2000 | 2007 | Trend 2000-2007 | |
Czech Republic | 50.3 | 62.7 | +25% | 59.0 | -6% |
Germany, Saarland | 58. 8 | 61.7 | +5% | 58.7 | -5% |
Slovakia | 41.7 | 55.7 | +33% | 57.9 | +4% |
Austria | 48.8 | 49.4 | +1% | 41.8 | -16% |
Poland, Kielce | 19.1 | 34.3 | +80% | 35.7 | +4% |
Table 2 Characteristics of selected fecal occult blood test colorectal cancer screening projects including personal invitations
Country | Age group (yr), test | Time period | Procedure in personal invitation | Participation rate | Source |
Studies and pilot projects | |||||
England | 50-69 | 2000-2004 | Centralized invitations by the screening unit | F: 59% | Weller et al[67], 2007 |
gFOBT | Sending fecal occult blood test (FOBT) test kits | SM: 48% | UKCRCSPG[66], 2004 | ||
SW: 56% | |||||
France | 50-74 | 2003-2006 | Centralized invitations according to sickness fund database files | FM: 54% | Denis et al[59], 2007 |
gFOBT | Invitation to general practitioners (GP), reminder after 6 mo, FOBT kit reminder 4 mo later | FW: 57% | |||
Exclusions by GP: serious illness, recent colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, high CRC risk | |||||
Netherlands | 50-74 | 2006-2007 | Centralized invitations | gFOBT: | Hol et al[60], 2010 |
gFOBT, FIT | Exclusions: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), CRC, recent CRC screening | 50% | |||
Pre-invitation, sending test kits after 2 wk, reminder after 6 wk | FIT: 62% | ||||
Scotland | 50-69 | 2000-2007 | Centralized invitations by the screening center | FM: 50%, FW: 60% | Steele et al[65], 2009 |
gFOBT | Sending FOBT test kits | SM: 49%, SW: 57% | |||
Reminder-second kit-after 6 wk (kit in first round only) | |||||
Spain | 50-69 | Since 2000 | Centralized invitations | FM: 17%, FW: 18% | Peris et al[64], 2007 |
gFOBT | Exclusions: CRC, adenoma, high CRC risk | SM: 21%, SW: 24% | |||
Invitation-reply-sending test kit, reminder after 6 wk | |||||
Population-based screening programs | |||||
England | 60-69 | Since 2006 | Centralized invitations by the screening center | M: 50% | Logan et al[61], 2012 |
gFOBT | People registered with a GP practice | W: 54% | |||
Sending FOBT test kits | |||||
Finland | 60-69 | Since 2004 | Centralized invitations by the national screening center | FM: 62%, FW: 77% | Malila et al[48], 2011 |
gFOBT | using Population Register Center | SM: 68%, SW: 80% | Malila et al[63], 2008 | ||
Sending FOBT test kits | Malila et al[62], 2005 |
Table 3 Basic characteristics of preventive colonoscopies performed within the Czech colorectal cancer screening program, 2006-2012
Basic characteristics | Year | Patients with CS | Patients with detected adenoma | Proportion1 | Patients with detected CRC | Proportion1 |
FOBT+ CS | 2006 | 5334 | 1578 | 29.6% | 335 | 6.3% |
2007 | 5679 | 1635 | 28.8% | 337 | 5.9% | |
2008 | 7457 | 2367 | 31.7% | 446 | 6.0% | |
2009 | 11712 | 3778 | 32.3% | 599 | 5.1% | |
2010 | 18327 | 6235 | 34.0% | 829 | 4.5% | |
2011 | 20131 | 7134 | 35.4% | 733 | 3.6% | |
2012 | 21112 | 7788 | 36.9% | 770 | 3.6% | |
Total | 89752 | 30515 | 34.0% | 4049 | 4.5% | |
Screening CS | 2009 | 1362 | 345 | 25.3% | 24 | 1.8% |
2010 | 4400 | 1076 | 24.5% | 43 | 1.0% | |
2011 | 4571 | 1160 | 25.4% | 42 | 0.9% | |
2012 | 4480 | 1138 | 25.4% | 35 | 0.8% | |
Total | 14813 | 3719 | 25.1% | 144 | 1.0% | |
Total | 104565 | 34234 | 32.7% | 4193 | 4.0% |
- Citation: Zavoral M, Suchanek S, Majek O, Fric P, Minarikova P, Minarik M, Seifert B, Dusek L. Colorectal cancer screening: 20 years of development and recent progress. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(14): 3825-3834
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i14/3825.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.3825