Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2013; 19(37): 6144-6155
Published online Oct 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i37.6144
Published online Oct 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i37.6144
Table 1 Molecular targets and therapeutic agents
| Molecular targets | Therapeutic agents |
| VEGF/VEGFR | Sorafenib |
| Bevacizumab | |
| Vatalanib (PTK787) | |
| Cediranib (AZD2171) | |
| Brivanib | |
| Sunitinib | |
| Linifanib (ABT869) | |
| EGF/EGFR | Cetuximab |
| Erlotinib | |
| Lapatinib | |
| IGF/IGFR | OSI-906 |
| IMC-A12 | |
| AVE1642 | |
| BIIB022 | |
| Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK | Sorafenib |
| Selumetinib (AZD6244) | |
| PI3K/Akt/mTOR | AZD8055 |
| Everolimus | |
| Sirolimus | |
| Temsirolimus | |
| Wnt-β-catenin | PFK118-310 |
| PFK115-584 | |
| CGP049090 | |
| MET | Tivanitib |
Table 2 Efficacy results of targeted therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
| Molecular targets/agents | Phase | Efficacy | Ref. |
| VEGF/VEGFR | |||
| Sorafenib | Phase III SHARP | Median OS: 10.7 mo vs 7.9 mo | [58] |
| Sorafenib vs placebo | |||
| Phase III (Asian) | Median OS:6.5 mo vs 4.2 mo | [59] | |
| Sunitinib | Phase II | Median PFS: 3.9 mo | [65] |
| Median OS: 9.8 mo | |||
| Phase III | Median OS: 7.9 mo vs 10.2 mo | ||
| Sunitinib vs sorafenib | |||
| Brivanib | Phase II, first-line | Median PFS: 2.8 mo | [68] |
| Median OS: 10 mo | |||
| Phase II, second-line | Median PFS: 2.7 mo | [69] | |
| Median OS: 9.8 mo | |||
| Phase III (BRISK-PS) | Median OS: 9.4 mo vs 8.3 mo | [70] | |
| Brivanib vs placebo | TTP: 4.2 mo vs 2.7 mo | ||
| RR: 12% vs 2% | |||
| Phase III (BRISK-FL) | Median OS: 9.5 mo vs 9.9 mo | [71] | |
| Brivanib vs placebo | TTP: 4.2 mo vs 4.1 mo | ||
| RR: 12% vs 8% | |||
| Vatalanib (PTK787) | Phase I/II, combined with doxorubicin | OS: 7.3 mo | [73] |
| PFS: 5. 4 mo | |||
| Inifanib (ABT-869) | Phase II | TTP: 3.7 mo | [75] |
| Median OS: 9.7 mo | |||
| Cediranib (AZD2171) | Phase II | Median OS: 5.8 mo | [78] |
| TTP: 2.8 mo | |||
| EGF/EGFR | |||
| Cetuximab | Phase II | Median OS: 9.6 mo | [81] |
| Median PFS: 1.4 mo | |||
| Erlotinib | Phase III (SEARCH) | Median OS: 9.5 mo vs 8.5 mo | [83] |
| Sorafenib/erlotinib vs orafenib/placebo | TTP: 3.2 mo vs 4.0 mo | ||
| Lapatinib | Phase II | Median PFS: 2.3 mo | [85] |
| Median OS: 6.2 mo | |||
| Phase III | Median OS: 9.1 mo vs 9.8 mo | ||
| Lipatinib vs sorafenib | |||
| IGF/IGFR | |||
| Cituxumumab (IMC-A12) | Phase II | Median OS: 8 mo | [93] |
| Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK | |||
| Selumetinib (AZD6244) | Phase I/II | 11 patients enrolled | [31] |
| PR in 3, SD in 6, PD in 2 patients | |||
| PI3K/Akt/mTOR | |||
| Everolimus | Phase I/II | Median PFS: 3.8 mo | [37] |
| Median OS: 8.4 mo | |||
| Sirolimus | Phase II | Median PFS: 15.3 wk | [38] |
| Median OS: 26.4 wk | |||
| MET | |||
| Tivantinib | Randomized Phase II | [100] | |
| Tivantinib vs placebo | |||
| ITT population | Median TTP: 6.9 wk vs 6.0 wk | ||
| Median OS: 6.6 mo vs 6.2 wk | |||
| c-Met high | Median TTP: 11.7 wk vs 6.1 wk | ||
| Median OS: 7.2 mo vs 3.8 wk |
- Citation: Shin JW, Chung YH. Molecular targeted therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current and future. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(37): 6144-6155
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i37/6144.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i37.6144
