Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2013; 19(35): 5877-5882
Published online Sep 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i35.5877
Table 1 Demographic data n (%)
CharacteristicValue
Total number of patients896
Female patients717 (80)
Male patients179 (20)
Mean age of females (yr)41.4 ± 21.3
Mean age of males (yr)45.0 ± 21.6
Number of patients underwent LC without MRCP or/and ERCP703 (78.5)
Number of patients with abnormal liver functions.193 (21.5)
Female patients116 (60)
Male patients77 (40)
Mean age of females (yr)55.6 ± 19.6
Mean age of males (yr)60.7 ± 19.8
Table 2 Radiological findings in patients with abnormal liver function tests n (%)
FindingsPatientStonesMean T.BiliMean Al-P
removed(mg/dL)(ratio to
by ERCPnormal)
Total1931093.71.7
Abnormal CBD on USG (percent of total)91 (47.2)82 (90)4.22
CBD dilatation28 (30.8)24 (85.7)4.52
CBD stones23 (25.3)20 (87)4.32.2
Both40 (43.9)38 (90)41.8
Normal CBD on USG,102 (52.8)27 (26.5)3.31.4
MRCP findings (percent of total)
Normal MRCP70 (68.6)2 (2.9)3.21.3
Stones on MRCP32 (31.4)25 (78.2)3.41.7
Table 3 Final endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography findings
Presence ofPatientUS abnormalMean T.BiliMean Al-P
stones(mg/dL)(ratio to normal)
Stones109 (56.5)82 (90)4.3 ± 2.11.9 ± 0.8
No stones84 (43.5)9 (10)2.9 ± 1.31.3 ± 0.6
P value< 0.0001 < 0.01 < 0.001
Total193  91 3.71.7
Table 4 Multivariate analysis n (%)
FindingsCommon bile duct stones
OR195%CI1
PresentAbsent
Alkaline phosphatase
< 151 U10 (23.3)33 (76.7)1
151-225 U37 (54.4)31 (45.6)3.17.00-9.88
226-300 U21 (58.0)15 (42.0)4.51.23-16.49
> 300 U41 (89.0)5 (11.0)29.87.28-121.54
Ultrasound findings
Normal27 (26.5)75 (73.5)1
Dilatation24 (86.0)4 (14.0)19.85.41-72.42
Stones20 (87.0)3 (13.0)14.33.53-58.17
Both38 (95.0)2 (5.0) 6113.03-285.1