Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2013; 19(34): 5645-5650
Published online Sep 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i34.5645
Published online Sep 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i34.5645
Percentage of label claim (prescription number, type of packaging) | ||||||||||||||
Sample location1 | 1, jar | 2, jar | 4, jar | 10, jar | 11, jar | 14, jar | 19, jar | 20, jar | 25, jar | 26, jar | 27, jar | 28, jar | 32, tube | 33, tube |
Location 1 | 111.9% | 110.8% | 102.9% | 97.5% | 126.0% | 83.3% | 100.2% | 71.4% | 73.0% | 39.9% | 94.8% | 83.8% | 44.3% | 67.4% |
Location 2 | 108.7% | 114.2% | 95.7% | 98.0% | 117.8% | 73.1% | 99.3% | 20.9% | 58.7% | 74.2% | 68.9% | 66.5% | 15.1% | 83.4% |
Location 3 | 142.1% | 112.0% | 100.6% | 101.1% | 144.9% | 93.4% | 91.2% | 82.3% | 67.3% | 52.1% | 63.4% | 81.1% | 16.8% | 80.7% |
Location 4 | 149.1% | 145.5% | 99.8% | 100.9% | 117.1% | 72.4% | 99.9% | 81.8% | 64.9% | 76.1% | 57.7% | 82.9% | 33.8% | 87.9% |
Location 5 | 110.6% | 106.5% | 109.0% | 92.9% | 107.4% | 112.4% | 95.9% | 69.2% | 63.2% | 67.9% | 54.3% | 71.5% | 67.7% | 81.5% |
Location 6 | 106.7% | 99.9% | 97.1% | 90.9% | 116.1% | 161.1% | 97.3% | 81.3% | 59.5% | 65.8% | 51.5% | 65.4% | 29.4% | 79.3% |
Location 7 | 110.8% | 103.8% | 100.8% | 85.9% | 121.2% | 211.2% | 77.8% | 79.9% | 55.2% | 72.0% | 56.1% | 65.6% | 42.0% | 83.0% |
Location 8 | 111.7% | 107.8% | 231.7% | 89.2% | 120.6% | 220.8% | 91.0% | 82.1% | 57.6% | 70.6% | 52.8% | 65.6% | 29.4% | 90.7% |
Mean | 119.0% | 112.6% | 117.2% | 94.6% | 121.4% | 128.5% | 94.1% | 71.1% | 62.4% | 64.8% | 62.4% | 72.8% | 34.8% | 81.7% |
Relative SD | 14.0% | 12.5% | 39.6% | 6.0% | 9.0% | 46.9% | 8.0% | 29.4% | 9.4% | 19.2% | 22.9% | 11.5% | 48.5% | 8.5% |
Pharmacy No. | Label claim (mean ± SD) | Relative SD |
1 | 95.9% ± 9.8% | 8.7 |
2 | 107.3% ± 16.5% | 15.4 |
3 | 95.9% ± 2.2% | 2.2 |
4 | 103.3% ± 5.1% | 4.9 |
5 | 86.5% ± 20.1% | 23.2 |
6 | 106.2% ± 1.8% | 1.7 |
7 | 81.6% ± 6.5% | 8.0 |
8 | 100.1% ± 2.0% | 1.9 |
9 | 63.2% ± 3.8% | 6.0 |
10 | 70.4% ± 3.2% | 4.5 |
11 | 68.8% ± 6.5% | 9.4 |
12 | 102.9% ± 0.8% | 0.8 |
- Citation: Shah M, Sandler L, Rai V, Sharma C, Raghavan L. Quality of compounded topical 2% diltiazem hydrochloride formulations for anal fissure. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(34): 5645-5650
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i34/5645.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i34.5645