Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2013; 19(33): 5520-5527
Published online Sep 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i33.5520
Published online Sep 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i33.5520
Table 1 Patients and treatment characteristics
No. | Age (yr) | Preoperative stage | Surgical treatment | Postoperative stage |
1 | 56 | cT3N2M0 | LAR | ypT0N1M0 |
2 | 57 | cT4N2M0 | LAR | ypT3N0M0 |
3 | 46 | cT3N2M0 | LAR | ypT3N1M0 |
4 | 69 | cT4N1M0 | APR | ypT2N0M0 |
5 | 40 | cT3N2M0 | APR | ypT3N2M0 |
6 | 40 | cT3N1M0 | APR | ypT0N0M0 |
7 | 58 | cT4N1M0 | APR | ypT2N0M0 |
8 | 57 | cT3N2M0 | APR | ypT0N0M0 |
9 | 51 | cT4N2M0 | Exploratory laparotomy | ypT4N2M0 |
10 | 55 | cT3N1M0 | APR | ypT3N1M0 |
11 | 68 | cT3N2M0 | APR | ypT3N0M0 |
12 | 58 | cT3N2M0 | APR | ypT3N1M0 |
13 | 61 | cT3N2M0 | LAR | ypT1N1M0 |
14 | 32 | cT4N2M0 | APR | ypT3N1M0 |
15 | 55 | cT3N1M0 | APR | ypT3N1M0 |
Table 2 Apparent diffusion coefficient values at six measurement times
No. | Apparent diffusion coefficient values (× 10-3 mm2/s) | |||||
Week 0 | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | |
1 | 0.723 | 0.743 | 0.893 | 0.756 | 0.606 | 0.793 |
2 | 0.583 | 0.458 | 0.786 | 0.385 | 0.540 | 0.793 |
3 | 0.752 | 0.883 | 0.655 | 0.711 | 0.683 | 0.772 |
4 | 0.883 | 0.887 | 0.887 | 0.945 | 0.923 | 0.972 |
5 | 0.995 | 0.853 | 0.995 | 0.950 | 0.832 | 1.120 |
6 | 0.813 | 0.965 | 1.133 | 0.964 | 0.893 | 0.686 |
7 | 0.518 | 0.416 | 0.998 | 0.539 | 0.527 | 0.473 |
8 | 0.659 | 0.747 | 0.825 | 0.858 | 0.631 | 0.746 |
9 | 0.814 | 0.791 | 0.809 | 0.894 | 0.821 | 0.798 |
10 | 0.628 | 0.637 | 0.625 | 0.703 | 0.784 | 0.930 |
11 | 0.562 | 0.575 | 0.806 | 0.742 | 0.677 | 0.515 |
12 | 0.616 | 0.595 | 0.834 | 0.850 | 0.907 | 1.050 |
13 | 0.851 | 0.825 | 0.865 | -1 | 0.831 | 0.882 |
14 | 0.592 | -1 | 0.734 | 0.622 | 0.574 | 0.605 |
15 | 1.255 | 1.435 | 1.420 | 1.282 | 1.256 | 1.450 |
95%CI | 0.641-0.858 | 0.627-0.918 | 0.775-0.994 | 0.675-0.925 | 0.659-0.872 | 0.702-0.976 |
Table 3 Mean tumor apparent diffusion coefficient values and the P values for the comparisons with the pretreatment values
Apparent diffusion coefficient values (× 10-3 mm2/s) | ||||||
Week 0 | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | |
All (n = 15) | 0.749 | 0.772 | 0.884 | 0.800 | 0.766 | 0.839 |
P value | - | 0.672 | 0.004 | 0.077 | 0.586 | 0.033 |
T downstage (n = 8) | 0.703 | 0.720 | 0.890 | 0.724 | 0.691 | 0.744 |
P value | - | 0.964 | 0.011 | 0.406 | 0.578 | 0.284 |
No T downstage (n = 7) | 0.803 | 0.824 | 0.878 | 0.876 | 0.851 | 0.948 |
P value | - | 0.617 | 0.185 | 0.117 | 0.430 | 0.074 |
Good regression (n = 9) | 0.659 | 0.671 | 0.852 | 0.696 | 0.674 | 0.714 |
P value | - | 0.909 | 0.004 | 0.212 | 0.617 | 0.251 |
Poor regression (n = 6) | 0.886 | 0.907 | 0.933 | 0.938 | 0.904 | 1.027 |
P value | - | 0.669 | 0.372 | 0.264 | 0.785 | 0.086 |
Table 4 Mean tumor apparent diffusion coefficient values and P values for the comparisons between groups
Group | Apparent diffusion coefficient values (× 10-3 mm2/s) | |||||
Week 0 | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 | |
T downstage (n = 8) | 0.702 | 0.720 | 0.890 | 0.724 | 0.690 | 0.743 |
No T downstage (n = 7) | 0.803 | 0.824 | 0.877 | 0.875 | 0.851 | 0.947 |
P value | 0.339 | 0.463 | 0.909 | 0.202 | 0.108 | 0.114 |
Good regression (n = 9) | 0.658 | 0.670 | 0.851 | 0.618 | 0.673 | 0.713 |
Poor regression (n = 6) | 0.885 | 0.907 | 0.933 | 0.938 | 0.903 | 1.027 |
P value | 0.021 | 0.081 | 0.452 | 0.032 | 0.016 | 0.010 |
- Citation: Cai G, Xu Y, Zhu J, Gu WL, Zhang S, Ma XJ, Cai SJ, Zhang Z. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting the response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(33): 5520-5527
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i33/5520.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i33.5520