Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2013; 19(32): 5309-5313
Published online Aug 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i32.5309
Published online Aug 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i32.5309
Table 1 Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and operative records
| Suture group (n = 47) | Control group (n = 63) | P value | |
| Sex | 0.196 | ||
| Male | 29 (61.7) | 31 (49.2) | |
| Female | 18 (38.3) | 32 (50.8) | |
| Age (yr) (range) | 64.1 ± 9.8 (39-80) | 61.4 ± 11.0 (42-82) | 0.199 |
| BMI (kg/m2) (range) | 24.1 ± 3.1 (18.5-33.7) | 23.5 ± 2.7 (17.9-28.8) | 0.272 |
| Tumor level (cm above AV) (ranges) | 9.7 ± 3.9 (2-15) | 9.7 ± 3.6 (4-15) | 0.974 |
| Diverting ileostomy | 6 (12.8) | 19 (30.2) | 0.031 |
| Length of the operation (min) (ranges) | 198.3 ± 75.7 (90-477) | 212.1 ± 65.0 (75-335) | 0.305 |
| Estimated blood loss (mL) (ranges) | 174.5 ± 348.0 (0-2000) | 188.4 ± 301.5 (0-1500) | 0.823 |
Table 2 Postoperative courses
| Suture group (n = 47) | Control group (n = 63) | P value | |
| Flatus (d) (range) | 1.5 ± 0.9 (0-4) | 1.5 ± 1.2 (0-7) | 0.809 |
| Stool (d) (range) | 4.1 ± 2.5 (0-10) | 3.8 ± 1.7 (1-7) | 0.675 |
| Feed (d) (range) | 2.8 ± 1.1 (1-6) | 2.3 ± 1.8 (1-13) | 0.103 |
| Postoperative HS (d), (range) | 11.0 ± 5.6 (4-36) | 9.8 ± 6.7 (5-44) | 0.321 |
| Complications | 4 (8.5) | 7 (11.1) | 0.656 |
| Anastomotic leakage | 3 (6.4) | 5 (7.9) | 0.759 |
| Conservative management | 1 | 3 | |
| Reoperation | 2 | 2 | |
| Intra-abdominal bleeding | 0 | 1 (1.6) | 0.390 |
| Postoperative ARF | 1 (2.1) | 1 (1.6) | 0.390 |
- Citation: Baek SJ, Kim J, Kwak J, Kim SH. Can trans-anal reinforcing sutures after double stapling in lower anterior resection reduce the need for a temporary diverting ostomy? World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(32): 5309-5313
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i32/5309.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i32.5309
