Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2013; 19(19): 2864-2882
Published online May 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i19.2864
Published online May 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i19.2864
Table 1 Essential steps of herbal hepatotoxicity assessments
| Quality specifications |
| Herbal product quality |
| Good agricultural practices |
| Good manufacturing practices |
| Definition of plant family, subfamily, species, subspecies, and variety |
| Definition of plant part |
| Definition of solvents and solubilizers |
| Lack of impurities, adulterants, and misidentifications |
| Minimum of batch and product variability |
| Lack of variety to variety variability |
| Clinical assessment quality |
| Brand name with details of ingredients, plant parts, batch number, and expiration date |
| Identification as herbal drug or herbal supplement |
| Herb as an ingredient of a polyherbal product or an undetermined herbal product |
| Manufacturer with address |
| Indication of herbal use with dates of symptoms leading to herbal treatment |
| Daily dose with details of the application form |
| Exact date of herb start and herb end |
| Accurate dates of emerging new symptoms after herb start in chronological order |
| Accurate date of initially increased liver values |
| Timeframes of challenge, latency period, and dechallenge |
| Verification or exclusion of a temporal association |
| Provided temporal association is verified, evaluation of a causal relationship |
| Gender, age, body weight, height, body mass index |
| Ethnicity, profession |
| Past medical history regarding general diseases and specifically liver diseases |
| ALT value initially including normal range |
| ALT values during dechallenge at least on days 8 and 30, as well as later on |
| ALT values during dechallenge to exclude a second peak |
| ALT normalization with exact date and actual value |
| ALP value initially including normal range |
| ALP values during dechallenge up to 180 d, as well as later on |
| ALP values during dechallenge to exclude a second peak |
| ALP normalization with exact date and actual value |
| AST value initially including normal range |
| Laboratory criteria for definition of hepatotoxicity and its pattern |
| Definition of risk factors such as age and alcohol |
| Alcohol and drug use |
| Statement regarding actual treatment including steroids or ursodesoxycholic acid |
| Assessment of preexisting and coexisting liver unrelated diseases |
| Assessment of preexisting and coexisting liver diseases |
| Consideration of the several hundreds of other possible liver diseases |
| Providing details to exclude alternative diagnoses |
| Assessment and exclusion of hepatitis A virus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis E virus, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, HSV, VZV |
| Liver and biliary tract imaging including color Doppler sonography of liver vessels |
| Specific evaluation of alcoholic, cardiac, autoimmune, and genetic liver diseases |
| Individual quantitative score of each alternative diagnosis |
| Comedicated synthetic drugs, herbal drugs, herbal and other dietary supplements |
| Definition of and search for accidental, unintended reexposure |
| Assessing of unintended reexposure |
| Search for evidence of prior known hepatotoxicity of the suspected herb |
| Assessing of known hepatotoxicity caused by the herb |
| Qualified data acquisition and documentation of complete data |
| Transparent presentation of all data |
| Causality assessment quality |
| Prospective assessment by the physician suspecting herb induced liver injury |
| Structured and quantitative method |
| Liver specific causality assessment method validated for hepatotoxicity |
| Use of the CIOMS scale |
| Gathering of all data required for the CIOMS scale item by item |
| Presentation of individual CIOMS items and of scores to regulatory agency |
| Gathering all clinical data and presentation to regulatory agency |
| Excluding all alternative causes and presentation to regulatory agency |
| Regulatory case assessment by skilled hepatologist with clinical experience |
| Regulatory assessment with assistance of external experts |
| Transparent presentation of regulatory verified causality assessment results |
Table 2 Check list for herb induced liver injury diagnosis
| Items to be assessed | Information obtained | ||
| Yes | No | Partial | |
| Brand name with batch number and expiration date | □ | □ | □ |
| Indication of herbal use | □ | □ | □ |
| Dates of symptoms leading to herbal treatment | □ | □ | □ |
| Daily dose | □ | □ | □ |
| Application form of herbal product | □ | □ | □ |
| Exact date of herb start | □ | □ | □ |
| Exact date of herb end | □ | □ | □ |
| Accurate dates of emerging new symptoms after herb start in chronological order | □ | □ | □ |
| Accurate date of initially increased liver values | □ | □ | □ |
| Time frame of challenge | □ | □ | □ |
| Time frame of latency period | □ | □ | □ |
| Time frame of dechallenge | □ | □ | □ |
| Verification of temporal association | □ | □ | □ |
| Exclusion of temporal association | □ | □ | □ |
| Gender, age, body weight, height, BMI | □ | □ | □ |
| Ethnicity, profession | □ | □ | □ |
| Past medical history and actual assessment regarding preexisting general diseases | □ | □ | □ |
| Past medical history and actual assessment regarding preexisting liver diseases | □ | □ | □ |
| Risk factors such as age and alcohol | □ | □ | □ |
| Quantification of alcohol and drug use | □ | □ | □ |
| Comedicated synthetic drugs, herbal drugs, herbal and other dietary supplements with all details of product, daily dose, exact dates of start and end of use, indication | □ | □ | □ |
| ALT value initially including exact date and normal range | □ | □ | □ |
| ALT values during dechallenge at least on days 8 and 30, and later on, with exact dates | □ | □ | □ |
| ALT values during dechallenge to exclude a second peak, with exact dates | □ | □ | □ |
| ALT normalization with exact date and actual value | □ | □ | □ |
| ALP value initially including exact date and normal range | □ | □ | □ |
| ALP values during dechallenge up to 180 d, and later on, with exact dates | □ | □ | □ |
| ALP values during dechallenge to exclude a second peak, with exact dates | □ | □ | □ |
| ALP normalization with exact date and actual value | □ | □ | □ |
| AST value initially including normal range | □ | □ | □ |
| Laboratory criteria for definition of hepatotoxicity | □ | □ | □ |
| Laboratory criteria for injury pattern | □ | □ | □ |
| Liver and biliary tract imaging including hepatobiliary sonography, CT, MRT, MRC | □ | □ | □ |
| Color Doppler sonography of liver vessels | □ | □ | □ |
| Unintended reexposure | □ | □ | □ |
| Known hepatotoxicity caused by the herb | □ | □ | □ |
| Consideration and exclusion of other possible causes | □ | □ | □ |
| Hepatitis A | □ | □ | □ |
| Anti-HAV-IgM | |||
| Hepatitis B | □ | □ | □ |
| HBsAg, anti-HBc-IgM, HBV-DNA | |||
| Hepatitis C | □ | □ | □ |
| Anti-HCV, HCV-RNA | |||
| Hepatitis E | □ | □ | □ |
| Anti-HEV-IgM, anti-HEV-IgG, HEV-RNA | |||
| CMV | □ | □ | □ |
| CMV-PCR, titer change for anti-CMV-IgM and anti-CMV-IgG | |||
| EBV | □ | □ | □ |
| EBV-PCR, titer change for anti-EBV-IgM and anti-EBV-IgG | |||
| HSV | □ | □ | □ |
| HSV-PCR, titer change for anti-HSV-IgM and anti-HSV- IgG | |||
| VZV | □ | □ | □ |
| VZV-PCR, titer change for anti-VZV-IgM and anti-VZV-IgG | |||
| Other virus infections | □ | □ | □ |
| Specific serology of Adenovirus, Coxsackie-B-virus, Echovirus, Measles virus, Rubella virus, Flavivirus, Arenavirus, Filovirus, Parvovirus, HIV, and others | |||
| Other infectious diseases | □ | □ | □ |
| Specific assessment of bacteria, fungi, parasites, worms, and others | |||
| AIH type I | □ | □ | □ |
| Gamma globulins, ANA, SMA, AAA, SLA/LP, anti-LSP, anti-ASGPR | |||
| AIH type II | □ | □ | □ |
| Gamma globulins, anti-LKM-1 (CYP 2D6), anti-LKM-2 (CYP 2C9), anti-LKM-3 | |||
| PBC | □ | □ | □ |
| AMA, anti-PDH-E2 | |||
| PSC | □ | □ | □ |
| p-ANCA, MRC | |||
| AIC | □ | □ | □ |
| ANA, SMA | |||
| Overlap syndromes | □ | □ | □ |
| See AIH, PBC, PSC, and AIC | |||
| NASH | □ | □ | □ |
| BMI, insulin resistance, hepatomegaly, echogenicity of the liver | |||
| ALD | □ | □ | □ |
| Patient’s history, clinical and laboratory assessment, sonography | |||
| DILI | □ | □ | □ |
| Patient’s history, clinical and laboratory assessment, sonography, use of the CIOMS scale | |||
| Cocaine, ecstasy and other amphetamines | □ | □ | □ |
| Toxin screening | |||
| Rare intoxications | □ | □ | |
| Toxin screening for household and occupational toxins | |||
| Hereditary hemochromatosis | □ | □ | □ |
| Serum ferritin, total iron-binding capacity, genotyping for C2824 and H63D mutation, hepatic iron content | |||
| Wilson’s disease | □ | □ | □ |
| Copper excretion (24 h urine), ceruloplasmin in serum, free copper in serum, Coombs-negative hemolytic anemia, hepatic copper content, Kayser-Fleischer-Ring, neurologic-psychiatric work-up, genotyping | |||
| Porphyria | □ | □ | □ |
| Porphobilinogen in urine, total porphyrines in urine | |||
| α1-Antitrypsin deficiency | □ | □ | □ |
| α1-Antitrypsin in serum | |||
| Biliary diseases | □ | □ | □ |
| Clinical and laboratory assessment, hepatobiliary sonography, endosonography, CT, MRT, MRC | |||
| Pancreatic diseases | □ | □ | □ |
| Clinical and laboratory assessment, sonography, CT, MRT | |||
| Celiac disease | □ | □ | □ |
| TTG antibodies, endomysium antibodies, duodenal biopsy | |||
| Anorexia nervosa | □ | □ | □ |
| Clinical context | |||
| Parenteral nutrition | □ | □ | □ |
| Clinical context | |||
| Cardiopulmonary diseases with shock liver (cardiac hepatopathy, ischemic hepatitis) | □ | □ | □ |
| Cardiopulmonary assessment of congestive heart disease, myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, cardiac valvular dysfunction, pulmonary embolism, pericardial diseases, arrhythmia, hemorrhagic shock, and various other conditions | |||
| Addison’s disease | |||
| Plasma cortisol | □ | □ | □ |
| Thyroid diseases | |||
| TSH basal, T4, T3 | □ | □ | □ |
| Grand mal seizures | |||
| Clinical context of epileptic seizure (duration > 30 min) | □ | □ | □ |
| Heat stroke | |||
| Shock, hyperthermia | □ | □ | □ |
| Polytrauma | |||
| Shock, liver injury | □ | □ | □ |
| Systemic diseases | |||
| Specific assessment of M. Boeck, amyloidosis, lymphoma, other malignant tumors, sepsis and others | □ | □ | □ |
| Other diseases | |||
| Clinical context | □ | □ | □ |
Table 3 Methods of causality assessments for suspected herbal hepatotoxicity
| Methods of causality assessment | Specific criteria of various causality assessment methods | |||||
| Expert based | Structured | Qualitative | Quantitative | Liver specific | Liver validated | |
| Prospective evaluation | ||||||
| CIOMS scale | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| MV scale | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Naranjo scale | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No |
| KL method | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No |
| Ad hoc approach | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Retrospective evaluation | ||||||
| DILIN method | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| WHO method | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No |
| Expert opinion | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No |
Table 5 Updated Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences scale for the hepatocellular type of injury with items required for causality assessment in herb induced liver injury cases
| Items for hepatocellular injury | Possible score | Patient’s score |
| Time to onset from the beginning of the herb | ||
| 5-90 d (rechallenge: 1-15 d) | +2 | |
| < 5 or > 90 d (rechallenge: > 15 d) | +1 | |
| Alternative: Time to onset from cessation of the herb | ||
| ≤ 15 d (except for slowly metabolized herbal chemicals: > 15 d) | +1 | |
| Course of ALT after cessation of the herb | ||
| Percentage difference between ALT peak and N | ||
| Decrease ≥ 50% within 8 d | +3 | |
| Decrease ≥ 50% within 30 d | +2 | |
| No information or continued herbal use | 0 | |
| Decrease ≥ 50% after the 30th day | 0 | |
| Decrease < 50% after the 30th day or recurrent increase | -2 | |
| Risk factors | ||
| Alcohol use (drinks/d: > 2 for women, > 3 for men) | +1 | |
| No alcohol use (drinks/d: ≤ 2 for women, ≤ 3 for men) | 0 | |
| Age ≥ 55 yr | +1 | |
| Age < 55 yr | 0 | |
| Concomitant herbs(s) and drug(s) | ||
| None or no information | 0 | |
| Concomitant herb or drug with incompatible time to onset | 0 | |
| Concomitant herb or drug with compatible or suggestive time to onset | -1 | |
| Concomitant herb or drug known as hepatotoxin and with compatible or suggestive time to onset | -2 | |
| Concomitant herb or drug with evidence for its role in this case (positive rechallenge or validated test) | -3 | |
| Search for non drug causes | ||
| Group I (6 causes) | ||
| Anti-HAV-IgM | ||
| HBsAg, anti-HBc-IgM, HBV-DNA | ||
| Anti-HCV, HCV-RNA | ||
| Hepatobiliary sonography/colour Doppler sonography of liver vessels/endosonography/CT/MRC | ||
| Alcoholism (AST/ALT ≥ 2 IU/L) | ||
| Acute recent hypotension history (particularly if underlying heart disease) | ||
| Group II (6 causes) | ||
| Complications of underlying disease(s) | ||
| Infection suggested by PCR and titre change for | ||
| CMV (anti-CMV-IgM, anti-CMV-IgG) | ||
| EBV (anti-EBV-IgM, anti-EBV-IgG) | ||
| HEV (anti-HEV-IgM, anti-HEV-IgG) | ||
| HSV (anti-HSV-IgM, anti-HSV-IgG) | ||
| VZV (anti-VZV-IgM, anti-VZV-IgG) | ||
| Evaluation of group I and II | ||
| All causes-groups I and II- reasonably ruled out | +2 | |
| The 6 causes of group I ruled out | +1 | |
| 5 or 4 causes of group I ruled out | 0 | |
| Less than 4 causes of group I ruled out | -2 | |
| Non herb cause highly probable | -3 | |
| Previous information on hepatotoxicity of the herb | ||
| Reaction labelled in the product characteristics | +2 | |
| Reaction published but unlabelled | +1 | |
| Reaction unknown | 0 | |
| Response to readministration | ||
| Doubling of ALT with the herb alone, provided ALT below 5N before reexposure | +3 | |
| Doubling of ALT with the herb(s) and drug(s) already given at the time of first reaction | +1 | |
| Increase of ALT but less than N in the same conditions as for the first administration | -2 | |
| Other situations | 0 | |
| Total score for patient |
Table 6 Updated Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences scale for the cholestatic (± hepatocellular) type of injury with items required for causality assessment in herb induced liver injury cases
| Items for cholestatic (± hepatocellular) injury | Possible score | Patient’s score |
| Time to onset from the beginning of the herb | ||
| 5-90 d (rechallenge: 1-90 d) | +2 | |
| < 5 or > 90 d (rechallenge: > 90 d) | +1 | |
| Alternative: Time to onset from cessation of the herb | ||
| ≤ 30 d (except for slowly metabolized herbal chemicals: > 30 d) | +1 | |
| Course of ALP after cessation of the herb | ||
| Percentage difference between ALP peak and N | ||
| Decrease ≥ 50% within 180 d | +2 | |
| Decrease < 50% within 180 d | +1 | |
| No information, persistence, increase, or continued herbal use | 0 | |
| Risk factors | ||
| Alcohol use (drinks/d: > 2 for women, > 3 for men) and pregnancy | +1 | |
| No alcohol use (drinks/d: ≤ 2 for women, ≤ 3 for men) | 0 | |
| Age ≥ 55 yr | +1 | |
| Age < 55 yr | 0 | |
| Concomitant herbs(s) and drug(s) | ||
| None or no information | 0 | |
| Concomitant herb or drug with incompatible time to onset | 0 | |
| Concomitant herb or drug with compatible or suggestive time to onset | -1 | |
| Concomitant herb or drug known as hepatotoxin and with compatible or suggestive time to onset | -2 | |
| Concomitant herb or drug with evidence for its role in this case (positive rechallenge or validated test) | -3 | |
| Search for non drug causes | ||
| Group I (6 causes) | ||
| Anti-HAV-IgM | ||
| HBsAg, anti-HBc-IgM, HBV-DNA | ||
| Anti-HCV, HCV-RNA | ||
| Hepatobiliary sonography/colour Doppler sonography of liver vessels/endosonography/CT/MRC | ||
| Alcoholism (AST/ALT ≥ 2 IU/L) | ||
| Acute recent hypotension history (particularly if underlying heart disease) | ||
| Group II (6 causes) | ||
| Complications of underlying disease(s) | ||
| Infection suggested by PCR and titre change for | ||
| CMV (anti-CMV-IgM, anti-CMV-IgG) | ||
| EBV (anti-EBV-IgM, anti-EBV-IgG) | ||
| HEV (anti-HEV-IgM, anti-HEV-IgG) | ||
| HSV (anti-HSV-IgM, anti-HSV-IgG) | ||
| VZV (anti-VZV-IgM, anti-VZV-IgG) | ||
| Evaluation of group I and II | ||
| All causes-groups I and II- reasonably ruled out | +2 | |
| The 6 causes of group I ruled out | +1 | |
| 5 or 4 causes of group I ruled out | 0 | |
| Less than 4 causes of group I ruled out | -2 | |
| Non herb cause highly probable | -3 | |
| Previous information on hepatotoxicity of the herb | ||
| Reaction labelled in the product characteristics | +2 | |
| Reaction published but unlabelled | +1 | |
| Reaction unknown | 0 | |
| Response to readministration | ||
| Doubling of ALP with the herb alone, provided ALP below 5N before reexposure | +3 | |
| Doubling of ALP with the herb(s) and drug(s) already given at the time of first reaction | +1 | |
| Increase of ALP but less than N in the same conditions as for the first administration | -2 | |
| Other situations | 0 | |
| Total score for patient |
Table 4 Details of the various causality assessment methods for herb induced liver injury
| Assessed items with specific scores | CIOMS | MV | Naranjo | KL | Ad hoc | DILIN | WHO | Expert opinion |
| Time frame of latency period (score) | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Time frame of challenge (score) | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Time frame of dechallenge (score) | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Recurrent ALT or ALP increase (score) | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Definition of risk factors (score) | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Verified alternative diagnoses (score) | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Assessed HAV, HBV, HCV (score) | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Assessed CMV, EBV, HSV, VZV (score) | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Liver and biliary tract imaging (score) | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Liver vessel Doppler sonography (score) | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Assessed preexisting diseases (score) | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Evaluated cardiac hepatopathy (score) | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Excluded alternative diagnoses (score) | + | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Comedication (score) | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Prior known herbal hepatotoxicity (score) | + | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Searched unintended reexposure (score) | + | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Defined unintended reexposure (score) | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unintended reexposure (score) | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laboratory hepatotoxicity criteria | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + |
| Laboratory hepatotoxicity pattern | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + |
| Liver specific method | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + |
| Structured, liver related method | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | 0 |
| Quantitative, liver related method | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Validated method for hepatotoxicity | + | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table 7 Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences scale as an example with items required for causality assessment in a patient with herb induced liver injury by four Indian Ayurvedic herbs
| Items for hepatocellular injury | Possible score | Psoralea corylifolia | Acacia catechu | Eclipta alba | Vetivexia zizaniodis |
| Time to onset from the beginning of the herb | |||||
| 5-90 d (rechallenge: 1-15 d) | +2 | ||||
| < 5 d or > 90 d (rechallenge: > 15 d) | +1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | +1 |
| Alternative: Time to onset from cessation of the herb | |||||
| ≤ 15 d (except for slowly metabolized herbal chemicals: > 15 d) | +1 | ||||
| Course of ALT after cessation of the herb | |||||
| Percentage difference between ALT peak and N | |||||
| Decrease ≥ 50% within 8 d | +3 | +3 | +3 | +3 | +3 |
| Decrease ≥ 50% within 30 d | +2 | ||||
| No information or continued herbal use | 0 | ||||
| Decrease ≥ 50% after the 30th day | 0 | ||||
| Decrease < 50% after the 30th day or recurrent increase | -2 | ||||
| Risk factors | |||||
| Alcohol use (drinks/d: > 2 for women, > 3 for men) | +1 | ||||
| No alcohol use (drinks/d: ≤ 2 for women, ≤ 3 for men) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Age ≥ 55 yr | +1 | +1 | +1 | +1 | +1 |
| Age < 55 yr | 0 | ||||
| Concomitant herbs(s) and drug(s) | |||||
| None or no information | 0 | ||||
| Concomitant herb or drug with incompatible time to onset | 0 | ||||
| Concomitant herb or drug with compatible or suggestive time to onset | -1 | -1 | |||
| Concomitant herb or drug known as hepatotoxin and with compatible or suggestive time to onset | -2 | -2 | -2 | -2 | |
| Concomitant herb or drug with evidence for its role in this case (positive rechallenge or validated test) | -3 | ||||
| Search for non herb causes | |||||
| Group I (6 causes) | |||||
| Anti-HAV-IgM | - | - | - | - | |
| HBsAg, anti-HBc-IgM, HBV-DNA | - | - | - | - | |
| Anti-HCV, HCV-RNA | - | - | - | - | |
| Hepatobiliary sonography/colour Doppler sonography of liver vessels/endosonography/CT/MRC | - | - | - | - | |
| Alcoholism (AST/ALT ≥ 2 IU/L) | - | - | - | - | |
| Acute recent hypotension history (particularly if underlying heart disease) | - | - | - | - | |
| Group II (6 causes) | |||||
| Complications of underlying disease(s) | - | - | - | - | |
| Infection suggested by PCR and titre change for | |||||
| CMV (anti-CMV-IgM, anti-CMV-IgG) | - | - | - | - | |
| EBV (anti-EBV-IgM, anti-EBV-IgG) | - | - | - | - | |
| HEV (anti-HEV-IgM, anti-HEV-IgG) | - | - | - | - | |
| HSV (anti-HSV-IgM, anti-HSV-IgG) | - | - | - | - | |
| VZV (anti-VZV-IgM, anti-VZV-IgG) | - | - | - | - | |
| Evaluation of group I and II | |||||
| All causes-groups I and II-reasonably ruled out | +2 | +2 | +2 | +2 | +2 |
| The 6 causes of group I ruled out | +1 | ||||
| 5 or 4 causes of group I ruled out | 0 | ||||
| Less than 4 causes of group I ruled out | -2 | ||||
| Non herb cause highly probable | -3 | ||||
| Previous information on hepatotoxicity of the herb | |||||
| Reaction labelled in the product characteristics | +2 | ||||
| Reaction published but unlabelled | +1 | +1 | |||
| Reaction unknown | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Response to readministration | |||||
| Doubling of ALT with the herb alone, provided ALT below 5N before reexposure | +3 | ||||
| Doubling of ALT with the herb(s) and drug(s) already given at the time of first reaction | +1 | ||||
| Increase of ALT but less than N in the same conditions as for the first administration | -2 | ||||
| Other situations | 0 | ||||
| Total score for each individual herb used by the patient | +7 | +5 | +5 | +5 |
- Citation: Teschke R, Frenzel C, Schulze J, Eickhoff A. Herbal hepatotoxicity: Challenges and pitfalls of causality assessment methods. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(19): 2864-2882
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i19/2864.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i19.2864
