Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2013; 19(18): 2752-2760
Published online May 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i18.2752
Published online May 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i18.2752
No. | Sex | Age | Location | Primary disease | Maximum lesion size (mm) | Prior treatment history | No. of OTSCs | Operation time (min) | Time from diagnosis (wk) | Technical/overall clinical successful | Additional treatment | Complication | Stay in hospital after OTSC placement (d) | Duration of follow-up (d) |
1 | M | 86 | Lower esophagus | Iatrogenic perforation caused by stomach tube | 20 | None | 1 | 5 | < 1 | Yes/yes | None | None | 6 | 56 |
2 | M | 74 | Stomach | Delayed perforation after ESD | 40 | None | 2 | 24 | < 1 | Yes/yes | None | None | 10 | 90 |
3 | F | 82 | Stomach | Perforation after ESD | 25 | None | 2 | 20 | < 1 | Yes/yes | None | None | 7 | 8 |
4 | M | 80 | Stomach | Peptic ulcer with bleeding | 15 | Hemostatic forceps | 1 | 8 | < 1 | Yes/yes | None | None | 21 | 30 |
5 | F | 71 | Stomach | Peptic ulcer with perforation | 40 | None | 2 | 23 | < 1 | Yes/yes | None | None | 7 | 58 |
6 | F | 88 | Stomach | Gastrocutaneous fistula | 10 | None | 1 | 18 | > 4 | Yes/yes | None | None | 8 | 84 |
7 | M | 98 | Stomach | Bleeding due to Mallory-Weiss syndrome | 12 | None | 1 | 12 | < 1 | Yes/yes | None | None | 6 | 15 |
8 | M | 73 | Duodenum | Para-anastomotic ulcer bleeding | 15 | Clips | 2 | 21 | < 1 | Yes/yes | None | None | 8 | 18 |
9 | M | 80 | Duodenal bulb | Peptic ulcer with bleeding | 23 | Clips and hemostatic forceps | 2 | 30 | < 1 | Yes/yes | None | None | 10 | 52 |
10 | M | 74 | Duodenal bulb | Peptic ulcer with perforation | 5 | None | 1 | 8 | < 1 | Yes/yes | None | None | 13 | 194 |
11 | F | 73 | Duodenal bulb | Prevention of post-ESD perforation | 25 | None | 1 | 10 | < 1 | Yes/yes | None | None | 7 | 95 |
12 | M | 75 | 3rd portion of duodenum | Delayed perforation after ESD | 28 | None | 2 | 36 | < 1 | Yes/yes | None | None | 15 | 210 |
13 | F | 85 | Rectum | Rectovesical fistula | 15 | None | 2 | 30 | < 1 | Yes/yes | None | None | 9 | 28 |
14 | F | 88 | Rectum | Iatrogenic rectal perforation/fistula | 25 | None | 1 | 8 | < 1 | Yes/yes | None | None | 10 | 30 |
15 | M | 73 | Stomach | Peptic ulcer with bleeding | 20 | Clips and HSE | N/A | N/A | 1-4 | No/no | Hemostatic forceps | N/A | N/A | N/A |
16 | M | 64 | Stomach | Peptic ulcer with bleeding | 50 | Hemostatic forceps | N/A | N/A | 1-4 | No/no | Hemostatic forceps | N/A | N/A | N/A |
17 | F | 65 | Sigmoid colon | Perforation after ESD | 35 | None | 1 | 7 | < 1 | Yes/yes | None | None | 8 | 160 |
18 | F | 83 | Sigmoid colon | Perforation after ESD | 40 | None | 3 | 16 | < 1 | Yes/yes | None | None | 8 | 90 |
19 | F | 88 | Stomach | Perforation caused by a local injection needle | 50 | None | 3 | 51 | 1-4 | Yes/no | Surgery | N/A | N/A | N/A |
20 | M | 65 | Rectum | Postoperative anastomotic ulcer bleeding | 5 | Hemostatic forceps | 1 | 6 | < 1 | Yes/yes | None | None | 8 | 14 |
21 | M | 65 | Rectum | Postoperative anastomotic ulcer bleeding | 5 | Hemostatic forceps | 2 | 19 | < 1 | Yes/yes | None | None | 7 | 30 |
22 | M | 73 | Sigmoid colon | Refractory diverticular bleeding | 5 | Clips | 1 | 7 | < 1 | Yes/yes | None | None | 5 | 10 |
23 | M | 73 | Stomach | Gastrobronchial fistula | 28 | Bronchial embolization | 1 | 40 | > 4 | Yes/no | May be given in future | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Patients | Overall clinical success | |
Location | ||
Esophagus | 1 | 1 (100) |
Stomach | 10 | 6 (60) |
Duodenum | 5 | 5 (100) |
Colon | 3 | 3 (100) |
Rectum | 4 | 4 (100) |
Primary disease | ||
GI bleeding | 9 | 7 (77) |
Chronic fistulae | 4 | 3 (75) |
Perforation | 11 | 10 (90) |
Maximum lesion size (mm) | ||
< 20 | 9 | 9 (100) |
20-30 | 8 | 6 (75) |
> 30 | 6 | 4 (66) |
Time from diagnosis (wk) | ||
< 1 | 18 | 18 (100) |
1-4 | 3 | 0 (0) |
> 4 | 2 | 1 (50) |
- Citation: Nishiyama N, Mori H, Kobara H, Rafiq K, Fujihara S, Kobayashi M, Oryu M, Masaki T. Efficacy and safety of over-the-scope clip: Including complications after endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(18): 2752-2760
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i18/2752.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i18.2752