Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2013; 19(17): 2691-2696
Published online May 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i17.2691
Published online May 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i17.2691
Table 1 Inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria
| Inclusion criteria |
| Age ≥ 18 yr and ≤ 60 yr |
| Positive HCV antibodies and detectable HCV RNA by PCR |
| Positive liver biopsy for chronic hepatitis with F1 METAVIR score and elevated liver enzymes or F2/F3 METAVIR score |
| Naïve to treatment with PEG-IFN and RIB |
| Hepatitis B surface antigen negativity |
| Normal complete blood count, normal thyroid function, prothrombin concentration ≥ 60%, normal bilirubin, α-fetoprotein < 100 (ng/mL) and antinuclear antibody titer < 1/160 |
| Exclusion criteria |
| Serious co-morbid conditions such as severe arterial hypertension, heart failure, significant coronary heart disease, poorly controlled diabetes (hemoglobin A1C > 8.5%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease |
| Major uncontrolled depressive illness |
| Solid transplant organ (renal, heart, or lung) |
| Untreated thyroid disease |
| History of previous anti-HCV therapy |
| Body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg/m² |
| Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection |
| Hypersensitivity to one of the two drugs (PEG-IFN, RIB) |
| Concomitant liver disease other than hepatitis C (chronic hepatitis B, autoimmune hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, hemochromatosis, α-1 antitrypsin deficiency, Wilson’s disease) |
| Liver biopsy showing severe steatosis (> 66%) and steatohepatitis, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma or METAVIR score F4 |
Table 2 Necroinflammatory activity and fibrosis staging scale
| Feature | |
| Grade A0 | No histologic necroinflammatory activity |
| Grade A1 | Mild activity |
| Grade A2 | Moderate activity |
| Grade A3 | Severe activity |
| Stage F0 | No fibrosis |
| Stage F1 | Portal fibrosis without septa |
| Stage F2 | Portal fibrosis with rare septa |
| Stage F3 | Numerous septa without cirrhosis |
| Stage F4 | Cirrhosis |
Table 3 Baseline characteristics
| Schisto + ve (n = 983) | Schisto - ve (n = 2613) | P value | |
| Age | 42.59 ± 9.21 | 41.62 ± 9.81 | 0.008 |
| Albumin (ref.: 3.5-5.5 mg/dL) | 4.20 ± 0.47 | 4.20 ± 0.47 | 0.251 |
| AST (ref.: 40 IU/L) | 55.91 ± 33.91 | 57.07 ± 46.00 | 0.412 |
| ALT (ref.: 40 IU/L) | 63.19 ± 41.68 | 63.38 ± 43.30 | 0.908 |
| HCV RNA, IU/mL | 1.4 × 106± 6.9 × 106 | 9.5 × 105± 7 × 106 | 0.083 |
| BMI | 28.12 ± 4.09 | 28.27 ± 4.4 | 0.387 |
| Male/female | 5.3/1 | 3.88/1 | 0.002 |
Table 4 Virological response at weeks 12, 24, 48 in relation to schistosomal serology n (%)
| Anti-schisto antibody | P value | |||
| Negative | Positive | Total | ||
| (n = 2613) | (n = 983) | (n = 3596) | ||
| Responders at week 12 (EVR) | 2335 (89.4) | 850 (86.5) | 3185 (88.6) | 0.015 |
| Responders at week 24 | 1768 (67.7) | 626 (63.7) | 2394 (66.6) | 0.024 |
| Responders at week 48 (ETR) | 1621 (62.0) | 581 (59.1) | 2202 (61.2) | 0.108 |
Table 5 Multivariate logistic regression analysis in which the failure of treatment is the dependent variable at weeks 48 and 72
| Factors | OR | P value | 95%CI | |
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Week 48 | ||||
| Age of > 50 yr | 1.15 | 0.245 | 0.91 | 1.50 |
| Female | 0.65 | 0.000 | 0.51 | 0.80 |
| Viremia, > 600 × 103 IU/mL | 1.78 | 0.000 | 1.41 | 2.30 |
| IFNα2b | 1.21 | 0.050 | 1.01 | 1.50 |
| Activity, A2, A3 | 0.68 | 0.001 | 0.54 | 0.90 |
| Fibrosis, > F2 | 1.69 | 0.000 | 1.35 | 2.10 |
| BMI, > 30 kg/m2 | 0.86 | 0.009 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Positive schisto status | 1.29 | 0.015 | 1.10 | 1.60 |
| Week 72 | ||||
| Age of > 50 yr | 1.0 | 0.990 | 0.7 | 1.3 |
| Female | 0.7 | 0.006 | 0.5 | 0.9 |
| Viremia, > 600 × 103 IU/mL | 1.6 | 0.001 | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| Activity, A2, A3 | 0.5 | < 0.01 | 0.4 | 0.7 |
| Fibrosis, > F2 | 1.9 | < 0.01 | 1.5 | 2.5 |
| Positive schisto status | 1.7 | < 0.01 | 1.3 | 2.1 |
- Citation: Abdel-Rahman M, El-Sayed M, El Raziky M, Elsharkawy A, El-Akel W, Ghoneim H, Khattab H, Esmat G. Coinfection with hepatitis C virus and schistosomiasis: Fibrosis and treatment response. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(17): 2691-2696
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i17/2691.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i17.2691
