Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2013; 19(14): 2187-2196
Published online Apr 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2187
Published online Apr 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2187
Type | mean ± SD | Range | 95%CI | Z | Sig. | |
TBA | Con | 44.51 ± 56.53 | 0.80-235.80 | 31.05-58.01 | -8.916 | 0.000 |
Reflux | 263.64 ± 171.61 | 0.70-660.50 | 229.41-297.87 | |||
DBIL | Con | 1.87 ± 1.85 | 0.00-8.90 | 1.43-2.31 | -3.914 | 0.000 |
Reflux | 5.43 ± 6.12 | 0.00-23.70 | 4.20-6.65 | |||
TBIL | Con | 1.63 ± 1.34 | 0.10-7.40 | 1.31-1.94 | -6.197 | 0.000 |
Reflux | 5.49 ± 5.51 | 0.30-21.90 | 4.39-6.59 |
- Citation: Chen TF, Yadav PK, Wu RJ, Yu WH, Liu CQ, Lin H, Liu ZJ. Comparative evaluation of intragastric bile acids and hepatobiliary scintigraphy in the diagnosis of duodenogastric reflux. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(14): 2187-2196
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i14/2187.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2187