Comparative evaluation of intragastric bile acids and hepatobiliary scintigraphy in the diagnosis of duodenogastric reflux

doi:10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2187

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 19, Issue 14

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (7843)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-6) series, Tables (1-2) series.

Item

Count

PDF

474

HTML

4908

Figures (1-6)

340

Tables (1-2)

266

Sum=5988

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

901

Download

954

Sum=1855

Apr 14, 2013 (publication date) through Feb 18, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (21)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Original Article

World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2013; 19(14): 2187-2196
Published online Apr 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2187

Table 1 Comparison of demographic and clinical characeristics of duodenogastric reflux group and control group

	DGR group (n = 99)	Control group (n = 70)
Age (mean ± SD)	48.6 ± 16.2	50.1 ± 13.2
Gender (male/female)	41/58	35/35
Epigastric pain (yes)	72.7%¹	17.10%
Nausea/vomit (yes)	20.2%¹	7.10%
Bitter taste (yes)	31.3%¹	4.30%
Sour regurgitation (yes)	23.2%¹	8.60%
Retrosternal pain (yes)	18.2%¹	1.40%
Anorexia (yes)	26.30%	10.00%

¹Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). DGR: Duodenogastric reflux.

Table 2 Results of gastric juice analyses between duodenogastric reflux group and control group

	Type	mean ± SD	Range	95%CI	Z	Sig.
TBA	Con	44.51 ± 56.53	0.80-235.80	31.05-58.01	-8.916	0.000
TBA	Reflux	263.64 ± 171.61	0.70-660.50	229.41-297.87	-8.916	0.000
DBIL	Con	1.87 ± 1.85	0.00-8.90	1.43-2.31	-3.914	0.000
DBIL	Reflux	5.43 ± 6.12	0.00-23.70	4.20-6.65	-3.914	0.000
TBIL	Con	1.63 ± 1.34	0.10-7.40	1.31-1.94	-6.197	0.000
TBIL	Reflux	5.49 ± 5.51	0.30-21.90	4.39-6.59	-6.197	0.000

Sig.: Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) or exact Sig.; TBA: Total bile acid; TBIL: Total bilirubin; DBIL: Direct bilirubin.

Citation: Chen TF, Yadav PK, Wu RJ, Yu WH, Liu CQ, Lin H, Liu ZJ. Comparative evaluation of intragastric bile acids and hepatobiliary scintigraphy in the diagnosis of duodenogastric reflux. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(14): 2187-2196
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i14/2187.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2187