Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2013; 19(14): 2141-2143
Published online Apr 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2141
Published online Apr 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2141
Table 1 Baseline characteristics and main treatment outcomes of our cohort (n = 15) n (%)
| Baseline characteristics | Value |
| Characteristic | |
| Male | 1 (6.7) |
| Age, yr (range) | 67 (62-76) |
| BCLC stage | |
| B - intermediate | 10 (66.7) |
| C - advanced | 5 (33.3) |
| Child-Pugh score | |
| 5 | 6 (40) |
| 6 | 9 (60) |
| Treatment outcomes | |
| Overall survival, mo (range) | 26.5 (10-36) |
| Liver decompensation | 4 (26.7) |
| Hepatocellular carcinoma progression | 3 (20.0) |
| Interruption of sorafenib therapy due to adverse events | 0 (0) |
- Citation: D’Angelo S, Secondulfo M, De Cristofano R, Sorrentino P. Sorafenib and entecavir: The dioscuri of treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma? World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(14): 2141-2143
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i14/2141.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2141
