Xu J, Bian YH, Jin X, Cao H. Prognostic assessment of different metastatic lymph node staging methods for gastric cancer after D2 resection. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(12): 1975-1983 [PMID: 23569344 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i12.1975]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Dr. Hui Cao, Department of General Surgery, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Dongfang Road No. 1630, Shanghai 200127, China. caohuishcn@hotmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Brief Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2013; 19(12): 1975-1983 Published online Mar 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i12.1975
Table 1 Clinical and histopathological characteristics of the patients
Factors
n
Gender (male/female)
281/146
Age ( ≤ 60 yr/> 60 yr)
200/227
Site (antrum/body/fundus/others)
234/163/22/8
Size (< 3 cm/3-6 cm/≥ 6 cm)
36/216/175
Histological grade (well/moderately/poorly)
11/313/103
Depth of invasion (T1/T2/≥ T3)
4/79/344
Lymphatic/venous invasion (absence/presence)
359/68
Perineural invasion (absence/presence)
396/31
Examined lymph nodes (< 10/10-15/> 15)
126/152/149
Table 2 Staging criteria of positive lymph nodes, metastatic lymph node ratio and log odds of positive lymph nodes classifications n (%)
Grade
MLR
LODDS
pN
0
Nr = 0
139 (32.6)
Nr < -1
129 (30.2)
0
139 (32.6)
1
0 < Nr ≤ 0.2
79 (18.5)
-1 ≤ Nr < -0.5
87 (20.4)
1-2
78 (18.3)
2
0.2 < Nr ≤ 0.4
58 (13.6)
-0.5 ≤ Nr < 0
85 (19.9)
3-6
94 (22.0)
3/3a
0.4 < Nr ≤ 0.7
104 (24.4)
0 ≤ Nr < 0.5
76 (17.8)
7-15
86 (20.1)
4/3b
0.7 < Nr ≤ 1
47 (11.0)
Nr ≥ 0.5
50 (11.7)
> 15
30 (7.0)
Table 3 Univariate analysis of various prognostic factors correlated to retrieved lymph nodes n (%)
Variable
5-yr survival rate
Log rankχ2value
P value
Examined lymph nodes
< 10
126 (29.5)
57.1%
4.256
0.039
10-15
152 (35.6)
55.9%
> 15
149 (34.9)
45.0%
pN
0
139 (32.6)
80.6%
97.014
0.000
1-2
78 (18.3)
57.7%
3-6
94 (22.0)
44.7%
7-15
86 (20.1)
27.9%
> 15
30 (7.0)
3.3%
MLR
Nr = 0
139 (32.6)
80.6%
103.984
0.000
0 < Nr ≤ 0.2
79 (18.5)
62.0%
0.2 < Nr ≤ 0.4
58 (13.6)
50.0%
0.4 < Nr ≤ 0.7
104 (24.4)
26.9%
0.7 < Nr ≤ 1
47 (11.0)
12.8%
LODDS
Nr < -1
129 (30.2)
80.6%
96.214
0.000
-1 ≤ Nr < -0.5
87 (20.4)
63.2%
-0.5 ≤ Nr < 0
85 (19.9)
43.5%
0 ≤ Nr < 0.5
76 (17.8)
27.6%
Nr ≥ 0.5
50 (11.7)
14.0%
Table 4 Five-year overall survival of patients with ≤ 15 tested lymph nodes based on positive lymph nodes and metastatic lymph node ratio staging system
MLR 0
MLR 1
MLR 2
MLR 3
MLR 4
χ2
P value
n
5-YSR
n
5-YSR
n
5-YSR
n
5-YSR
n
5-YSR
< 10 LN
pN 0
59
76.30%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
pN 1
-
-
8
50%
14
57.10%
2
0%
3
0%
22.293
0
pN 2
-
-
-
-
4
50%
22
31.80%
3
33.30%
0.51
0.775
pN 3a
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
66.70%
8
37.50%
0.78
0.377
χ2
-
-
0.258
9.278
1.658
P
-
-
0.611
0.098
0.437
10-15 LN
pN 0
56
80.40%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
pN 1
-
-
24
62.50%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
pN 2
-
-
1
100%
20
50%
18
44.40%
-
-
0.755
0.686
pN 3a
-
-
-
-
-
-
23
17.40%
10
20%
0.068
0.794
χ2
-
0.836
-
3.613
-
P
-
0.658
-
0.057
-
Table 5 Five-year overall survival of patients with ≤ 15 tested lymph nodes based on positive lymph nodes and log odds of positive lymph nodes staging system
LODDS 0
LODDS 1
LODDS 2
LODDS 3
LODDS 4
χ2
P value
n
5-YSR
n
5-YSR
n
5-YSR
n
5-YSR
n
5-YSR
< 10 LN
pN 0
33
81.80%
20
70%
6
66.7.0%
-
-
-
-
1.486
0.476
pN 1
-
-
10
50%
12
58.30%
4
0
1
0
22.349
0
pN 2
-
-
-
-
14
42.90%
13
30.80%
2
0
4.202
0.122
pN 3a
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
66.70%
8
37.5%
0.78
0.377
χ2
-
1.44
0.969
5.689
1.083
P
-
0.23
0.619
0.128
0.582
10-15 LN
pN 0
56
80.40%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
pN 1
-
-
24
62.50%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
pN 2
-
-
4
75%
23
43.50%
12
50%
-
-
1.241
0.538
pN 3a
-
-
-
-
2
0%
19
15.80%
12
25%
3.413
0.182
χ2
-
0.222
6.785
3.614
-
P
-
0.638
0
0.057
-
Citation: Xu J, Bian YH, Jin X, Cao H. Prognostic assessment of different metastatic lymph node staging methods for gastric cancer after D2 resection. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(12): 1975-1983