Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 21, 2013; 19(11): 1788-1796
Published online Mar 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i11.1788
Published online Mar 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i11.1788
Table 1 Correlation between the attenuation patterns of common bile duct stones on multidetector computed tomography and stone type (n = 111)
Stone type,n(size, mean ± SD, mm) | |||||
Attenuation patterns | Black pigment | Mixed cholesterol | Brown pigment | Pure cholesterol | Overall |
Heavily calcified | 15 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 34 |
(6.1 ± 3.4) | (7.0 ± 3.2) | (9.2 ± 4.1) | (6.9 ± 3.5) | ||
Radiopaque | 3 | 12 | 16 | 0 | 31 |
(7.0 ± 1.0) | (10.2 ± 4.3) | (13.6 ± 4.8) | (11.6 ± 4.8) | ||
Less radiopaque1 | 3 | 10 | 33 | 0 | 46 |
(5.7 ± 4.0) | (7.6 ± 3.5) | (9.9 ± 5.1) | (9.1 ± 4.8) | ||
Overall | 21 | 36 | 54 | 0 | |
(6.2 ± 3.1) | (8.2 ± 3.6) | (10.9 ± 5.1) |
Table 2 Detectability of common bile duct stones according to stone size and stone type n (%)
n | Detectable (n = 111) | Undetectable (n = 19) | P value | |
Size (mm) | ||||
< 3 | 9 | 4 (44) | 5 (56) | < 0.001 |
3–5 | 40 | 29 (74) | 11 (26) | |
6–10 | 45 | 43 (96) | 2 (4) | |
11–15 | 26 | 25 (96) | 1 (4) | |
> 15 | 10 | 10 (100) | 0 (0) | |
≤ 5 | 49 | 33 (67) | 16 (33) | < 0.001 |
> 5 | 81 | 78 (96) | 3 (4) | |
Type | ||||
Black pigment | 23 | 21 (91) | 2 (9) | < 0.001 |
Mixed cholesterol | 38 | 36 (95) | 2 (5) | |
Brown pigment | 60 | 54 (90) | 6 (10) | |
Pure cholesterol | 9 | 0 (0) | 9 (100) | |
Black or mixed | 61 | 57 (93) | 4 (7) | 0.023 |
Brown or pure cholesterol | 69 | 54 (78) | 15 (22) |
Table 3 Univariate analysis of the factors related to the detectability of common bile duct stones by multidetector computed tomography n (%)
Factors | Detectable(n = 111) | Undetectable(n = 19) | P value |
Age (yr) | 68.3 ± 14.2 | 58.0 ± 16.2 | 0.009 |
Male sex | 58 (52) | 9 (47) | 0.966 |
Accompanying GB stones | 43 (39) | 11 (58) | 0.117 |
Previous cholecystectomy | 28 (25) | 3 (16) | 0.561 |
Previous sphincterotomy | 13 (12) | 0 (0) | 0.213 |
Black or mixed stone | 57 (51) | 4 (21) | 0.009 |
Stone size (mm) | 9.1 ± 4.8 | 4.3 ± 2.9 | < 0.001 |
CBD diameter (mm) | 12.4 ± 4.6 | 9.2 ± 3.5 | 0.005 |
WBC (× 109/L) | 10.9 ± 6.01 | 9.86 ± 3.07 | 0.251 |
Alanine aminotransaminase (IU/L) | 210 ± 250 | 250 ± 208 | 0.513 |
Total bilirubin (mg/dL) | 3.8 ± 3.9 | 3.3 ± 2.8 | 0.565 |
Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L) | 215 ± 153 | 209 ± 114 | 0.862 |
γ-glutamyl transferase (IU/L) | 412 ± 342 | 500 ± 465 | 0.327 |
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of the factors related to the detectability of common bile duct stones by multidetector computed tomography
Factors | P value | Odds ratio (95%CI) |
Age | 0.032 | 1.049 (1.004-1.095) |
Stone type (black or mixed vs brown or pure cholesterol) | 0.002 | 8.851 (2.249-34.84) |
Stone size | 0.001 | 1.437 (1.153-1.791) |
CBD diameter | 0.538 |
- Citation: Kim CW, Chang JH, Lim YS, Kim TH, Lee IS, Han SW. Common bile duct stones on multidetector computed tomography: Attenuation patterns and detectability. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(11): 1788-1796
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i11/1788.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i11.1788