Kim CW, Chang JH, Lim YS, Kim TH, Lee IS, Han SW. Common bile duct stones on multidetector computed tomography: Attenuation patterns and detectability. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(11): 1788-1796 [PMID: 23555167 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i11.1788]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Jae Hyuck Chang, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 505 Banpo-Dong, Seocho-Gu, Seoul 137-701, South Korea. wwjjaang@catholic.ac.kr
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Brief Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 2 Detectability of common bile duct stones according to stone size and stone type n (%)
n
Detectable (n = 111)
Undetectable (n = 19)
P value
Size (mm)
< 3
9
4 (44)
5 (56)
< 0.001
3–5
40
29 (74)
11 (26)
6–10
45
43 (96)
2 (4)
11–15
26
25 (96)
1 (4)
> 15
10
10 (100)
0 (0)
≤ 5
49
33 (67)
16 (33)
< 0.001
> 5
81
78 (96)
3 (4)
Type
Black pigment
23
21 (91)
2 (9)
< 0.001
Mixed cholesterol
38
36 (95)
2 (5)
Brown pigment
60
54 (90)
6 (10)
Pure cholesterol
9
0 (0)
9 (100)
Black or mixed
61
57 (93)
4 (7)
0.023
Brown or pure cholesterol
69
54 (78)
15 (22)
Table 3 Univariate analysis of the factors related to the detectability of common bile duct stones by multidetector computed tomography n (%)
Factors
Detectable(n = 111)
Undetectable(n = 19)
P value
Age (yr)
68.3 ± 14.2
58.0 ± 16.2
0.009
Male sex
58 (52)
9 (47)
0.966
Accompanying GB stones
43 (39)
11 (58)
0.117
Previous cholecystectomy
28 (25)
3 (16)
0.561
Previous sphincterotomy
13 (12)
0 (0)
0.213
Black or mixed stone
57 (51)
4 (21)
0.009
Stone size (mm)
9.1 ± 4.8
4.3 ± 2.9
< 0.001
CBD diameter (mm)
12.4 ± 4.6
9.2 ± 3.5
0.005
WBC (× 109/L)
10.9 ± 6.01
9.86 ± 3.07
0.251
Alanine aminotransaminase (IU/L)
210 ± 250
250 ± 208
0.513
Total bilirubin (mg/dL)
3.8 ± 3.9
3.3 ± 2.8
0.565
Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L)
215 ± 153
209 ± 114
0.862
γ-glutamyl transferase (IU/L)
412 ± 342
500 ± 465
0.327
Table 4 Multivariate analysis of the factors related to the detectability of common bile duct stones by multidetector computed tomography
Factors
P value
Odds ratio (95%CI)
Age
0.032
1.049 (1.004-1.095)
Stone type (black or mixed vs brown or pure cholesterol)
0.002
8.851 (2.249-34.84)
Stone size
0.001
1.437 (1.153-1.791)
CBD diameter
0.538
Citation: Kim CW, Chang JH, Lim YS, Kim TH, Lee IS, Han SW. Common bile duct stones on multidetector computed tomography: Attenuation patterns and detectability. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(11): 1788-1796