Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2013; 19(1): 57-64
Published online Jan 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i1.57
Table 1 Characteristics of the study sample, distribution of steatosis as predicted by different methods, and comparison between subjects with fatty liver index ≥ 60 and < 60
Characteristics/methodRangeTotal (n = 338)FLI < 60 (n = 259)FLI60 (n = 79)P value
Age (yr)50.8 ± 10.450.0 ± 10.453.3 ± 10.00.01
Male %53.048.368.40.002
BMI (kg/m2)27.2 ± 4.425.6 ± 3.232.4 ± 3.9< 0.001
ALT (U/L)5-3922.1 ± 9.620.6 ± 7.426.9 ± 13.5< 0.001
AST (U/L)5-4023.0 ± 5.522.5 ± 4.824.7 ± 7.00.008
GGT (U/L)6-2816.0 ± 12.113.9 ± 11.122.7 ± 12.7< 0.001
Glucose (mg/dL)70-11090.8 ± 19.887.6 ± 16.2101.0 ± 26.1< 0.001
Insulin (μU/mL)5-2522.3 ± 11.719.5 ± 10.031.5 ± 12.3< 0.001
Triglycerides (mg/dL)50-175116.8 ± 60.4100.2 ± 44.4170.9 ± 73.3< 0.001
Ferritin (ng/mL)7.1-15172.7 ± 60.164.6 ± 55.3100.1 ± 67.5< 0.001
FL on AUS % (n = 338)31.118.572.2< 0.001
HRI (n = 331)1.3 ± 0.41.2 ± 0.31.6 ± 0.4< 0.001
HRI ≥ 1.50 (FL) %24.213.957.0< 0.001
SteatoTest (n = 338)0.3 ± 0.20.2 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.1< 0.001
S ≥ 2 (FL) %20.43.974.7< 0.001
S0 %66.984.210.1< 0.001
S1 %1-512.712.015.2 0.45
S2 %6-3313.03.943.0< 0.001
S3-S4 %34-1007.4031.6< 0.001
FLI (n = 338)36.7 ± 27.724.2 ± 17.177.8 ± 11.1< 0.001
FLI ≥ 60 (FL) %23.4NANANA
FLI < 30 %48.8NANANA
Table 2 Diagnostic value of fatty liver index for predicting steatosis vs SteatoTest or hepatorenal ultrasound index or abdominal ultrasound
FLI60 vsSensitivity %Specificity %PPV %NPV %κ
SteatoTest ≥ S2 (n = 338)85.592.674.796.10.74
HRI ≥ 1.50 (n = 331)56.386.55786.10.43
Abdominal ultrasound fatty liver (n = 244)80.387.372.291.50.65