Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2012; 18(9): 944-951
Published online Mar 7, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i9.944
Table 1 Tokyo guideline diagnostic criteria and severity assessment of acute cholecystitis
Diagnosis criteria
A: Local signs of inflammation
Murphy’s sign
Rright upper quadrant mass/pain/tenderness
B: Systemic signs of inflammation
Fever
Elevated C-reactive protein
Elevated white blood cell count
C: Imaging findings
Sonographic Murphy sign
Thickened gallbladder wall
Enlarged gallbladder
Pericholecystic fluid collection
Sonolucent layer in the gallbladder wall
Definite diagnosis
One item in A and one in B are positive
C confirms the diagnosis when acute cholecystitis is suspected clinically1
Severity assessment
Mild (grade I)
Acute cholecystitis does not meet the criteria of severe (grade III) or moderate (grade II) acute cholecystitis or acute cholecystitis in a healthy patient with no organ dysfunction and mild inflammatory changes in the gallbladder, making cholecystectomy a safe and low risk operative procedure
Moderate (grade II)
Elevated WBC count (> 18 000/mm3)
Palpable tender mass in the right upper quadrant
Duration of complains > 72 h2
Marked local inflammation (biliary peritonitis, pericholecystic abscess, hepatic abscess, gangrenous cholecystitis, emphysematous cholecystitis)
Severe (grade III)
Acute cholecystitis associated with dysfunction of any one of the following organs/systems
Cardiovascular dysfunction (hypotension requiring treatment with dopamine ≥ 5 μg/kg per minute, or any dose of dobutamine)
Neurological dysfunction (decreased level of consciousness)
Respiratory dysfunction (PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 300)
Renal dysfunction (oliguria, creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL)
Hepatic dysfunction (PT-INR > 1.5)
Table 2 Tokyo guideline diagnosis criteria and severity assessment of acute cholangitis
Diagnosis criteria (suspected diagnosis and definite diagnosis)
Severity assessment
A: Clinical context and clinical manifestations
History of biliary disease
Fever and/or chills
Jaundice
Abdominal pain (right upper quadrant or upper abdominal)
B: Laboratory data
Evidence of inflammatory response1
Abnormal liver function tests2
C: Imaging findings
Biliary dilation, or evidence of etiology (stricture, stone, stent, etc.)
Two or more items in A
Charcot’s triad (2 + 3 + 4)
Two or more items in A + both items in B + C
Severity assessment
Mild (grade I)
Acute cholangitis that responds to initial medical treatment3
Moderate (grade II)
Acute cholangitis that does not respond to initial medical treatmentc and is not accompanied by organ dysfunction
Severe (grade III)
Acute cholangitis that is associated with the onset of dysfunction at least in any one of the following organs/systems
Cardiovascular system; hypotension requiring dopamine ≥ 5 μg/kg per minute, or any dose of dobutamine
Nervous system: disturbance of consciousness
Respiratory system: PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 300
Kidney: serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL
Liver: PT-INR > 1.5
Hematological system: platelet count < 100 000/μL
Table 3 Comparison of patients’ demographics and operative outcome between dingle-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflamed gallbladder and single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for non-acute inflamed gallbladder
Patient demographicsSILC for AIGSILC for non-AIGP value
n2684
Age (yr) median (range)61.5 (22-81)56.5 (31-81)0.06
Sex (male/female)12/1442/420.82
BMI median (range)22.0 (18.4-29.4)22.2 (16.0-30.0)0.85
ASA score I/II/III14/11/165/19/00.02
Previous upper abdominal surgery (yes/no)2/244/800.63
Indication for operationAcute cholecystitis 15Symptomatic gallstone 65
Acute gallstone cholangitis 11Choledochlithiasis 2
No inflammation 17
Operative outcome
Operative time (min)0.03
Median (range)97.5 (60-163)85 (45-195)
mean (SD)105.7 (31.9)91.0 (29.3)
Intra-abdominal adhesion none to mild/moderate/severe8/15/352/27/150.02
Gallbladder wall thickening16/2/866/14/4< 0.01
none to mild/moderate/severe
IOC completion123/2481/82  0.4
Conversion to open cholecystectomy220.24
Bile spillage9150.1
Use of additional port site530.01
Complication (total)131.00
Wound infection12
Bile duct injury01
Table 4 Comparison of patient demographics and operative outcome between single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflamed gallbladder and traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflamed gallbladder
SILC for AIGTLC for AIGP value
Patient demographics
n2654
Age (yr) median (range)61.5 (22-81)61 (25-89)0.94
Sex (male/female)14/1234/200.47
BMI median (range)22.0 (18.4-29.4)22.8 (15.4-32.0)0.53
ASA score I/II/III14/11/125/25/40.73
Previous upper abdominal surgery (yes/no)2/245/490.59
Indication for operationAcute cholecystitis 14Acute cholecystitis 290.81
Acute gallstone cholangitis 11Acute gallstone cholangitis 25
Max WBC count in acute phase0.78
WBC > 14 000513
WBC < 14 0002141
Max CRP in acute phase0.44
CRP > 10618
CRP < 102036
Severity assessment by Tokyo Guidelines Grade I/II/III19/5/238/13/30.85
Day from onset to operation19 (6-111)20 (8-104)0.82
Clinical result
Operative time (min)0.12
Median (range)97.5 (60-163)87.5 (35-245)
mean (SD)  105.7 (31.9)94.7 (34.4)
Surgeon26/016/39
Staff surgeon/surgical resident
IOC completion123/2442/490.26
Conversion to open cholecystectomy251
Bile spillage9140.44
Complication170.26