Lim JY, Yoon SO, Hong SW, Kim JW, Choi SH, Cho JY. Thioredoxin and thioredoxin-interacting protein as prognostic markers for gastric cancer recurrence. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(39): 5581-5588 [PMID: 23112551 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i39.5581]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Dr. Jae Yong Cho, Department of Medical Oncology, Gangnam Severance Cancer Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 712 Eonjuro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-720, South Korea. chojy@yuhs.ac
Article-Type of This Article
Brief Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2012; 18(39): 5581-5588 Published online Oct 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i39.5581
Table 1 Clinicopathological factors of the gastric cancer patients
Characteristics
Microarray(n = 65)
qRT-PCR(n = 68)
TMA(n = 328)
Age
mean (range), yr
63 (32-83)
56 (26-82)
57 (25-82)
Sex, n (%)
Male/female
46 (71)/19 (29)
36 (53)/32 (47)
204 (62)/124 (38)
Follow up duration
Mean (95% CI), mo
41.7 (41-42)
89.5 (79-100)
99.8 (97.5-102)
Histological type, n (%)
Intestinal
23 (35)
14 (21)
100 (30)
Diffuse
42 (65)
54 (79)
228 (70)
TNM stage, n (%)
I
12 (18)
0
101 (31)
II
11 (17)
0
79 (24)
III
26 (40)
68 (100)
110 (33)
IV
16 (25)
0
38 (12)
Location, n (%)
Cardia
5 (8)
8 (12)
25 (8)
Non cardia
60 (92)
60 (88)
303 (92)
Adjuvant chemotherapy, n (%)
Yes
49 (75)
59 (87)
230 (70)
No
16 (25)
9 (13)
98 (30)
Table 2 Prognoses of stage III gastric cancer patients according to the thioredoxin and thioredoxin-interacting protein gene expression levels
Group
Mean RFS,(95% CI), mo
3-yr recurrenc-e-free rate (%)
5-yr surviv-al rate (%)
1: Low TXN and high TXNIP
Non applicable
70
89
2: Neither group 1 nor group 3
36.7 (15.5-57.9)
51
73
3: High TXN and low TXNIP
11.9 (9.5-14.2)
7
29
P value by log rank test
P < 0.001
P = 0.001
Table 3 Protein expression of thioredoxin and thioredoxin-interacting protein in gastric cancers
Characteristic (n)
TXN overexpressionn (%)
TXNIP underexpressionn (%)
Total (328)
213 (65)
278 (85)
Histologic type
Diffuse type (228)
149 (65)
201 (88)
Intestinal type (100)
64 (64)
77 (77)
P = 0.9
P = 0.012
Stage
Stage I/II (180)
116 (64)
142 (79)
Stage III/IV (148)
97 (66)
136 (92)
P = 0.767
P = 0.009
Table 4 In-trans correlation analysis of thioredoxin and thioredoxin-interacting protein with whole mRNA expressing genes
Symbol
Gene name
Correlation with TXN
Correlation with TXNIP
r
P value
r
P value
TXN
Thioredoxin
1.000
0.000
-0.295
0.022
RPL6
Ribosomal protein L6
0.779
< 0.001
-0.335
0.009
GLRX2
Glutaredoxin 2
0.764
< 0.001
-0.314
0.015
RPL29
Ribosomal protein L29
0.757
< 0.001
-0.360
0.005
MRPL22
Mitochondrial ribosomal protein L22
0.751
< 0.001
-0.225
0.085
MRPL42
Mitochondrial ribosomal protein L42
0.734
< 0.001
-0.181
0.166
MRPS17
Mitochondrial ribosomal protein S17
0.732
< 0.001
-0.387
0.002
ATP5S
ATP synthase-coupling factor B
0.728
< 0.001
-0.182
0.165
PRDX4
Peroxiredoxin 4
0.722
< 0.001
-0.321
0.012
AURKA
Aurora kinase A
0.611
< 0.001
-0.486
< 0.001
ERO1L
ERO1-like
0.586
< 0.001
-0.200
0.125
HIG2
Chromosome 7 open reading frame 68
0.574
< 0.001
-0.089
0.498
CCNB1
Cyclin B1
0.563
< 0.001
-0.503
< 0.001
ERBB3
HER3
0.004
0.975
-0.536
< 0.001
TXNIP
Thioredoxin interacting protein
-0.295
0.022
1.000
0.000
ATG12
ATG12 autophagy related 12 homolog
-0.482
< 0.001
0.072
0.582
ATG16L2
ATG16 autophagy related 16-like 2
-0.722
< 0.001
0.216
0.098
ATG10
Autophagy related 10 homolog
-0.756
< 0.001
0.266
0.040
Citation: Lim JY, Yoon SO, Hong SW, Kim JW, Choi SH, Cho JY. Thioredoxin and thioredoxin-interacting protein as prognostic markers for gastric cancer recurrence. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(39): 5581-5588