Tang ZR, Li K, Zhou YX, Xiao ZX, Xiao JH, Huang R, Gu GH. Comparative quantification of human intestinal bacteria based on cPCR and LDR/LCR. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(3): 268-274 [PMID: 22294830 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i3.268]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Dr. Yu-Xun Zhou, College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China. zhouyuxun@dhu.edu.cn
Article-Type of This Article
Brief Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 4 Experiment designIand II (detected with probe mixture No. 1 and 2)
Trial
Factor
Enterobacterium c
Eubacterium
Bifidobacterium
Enterococcus
Lactobacillus casei
Lactobacillus acidophilus
IC 1#
IC 2#
Detected with probe mixture No. 1
1
1
0.5
0.0625
0.01
0.005
0.000625
0.25
0.0025
2
0.5
0.0625
0.125
0.005
0.000625
0.00125
0.0625
0.000625
3
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.0025
0.0025
0.0025
1
0.01
4
0.125
1
0.5
0.00125
0.01
0.005
0.125
0.00125
5
0.0625
0.125
1
0.000625
0.00125
0.1
0.5
0.005
Detected with probe mixture No. 2
1
1
0.005
0.000625
0.01
0.005
0.000625
0.25
0.0025
2
0.5
0.000625
0.00125
0.005
0.000625
0.00125
0.0625
0.000625
3
0.25
0.0025
0.0025
0.0025
0.0025
0.0025
1
0.01
4
0.125
0.01
0.005
0.00125
0.01
0.005
0.125
0.00125
5
0.0625
0.00125
0.01
0.000625
0.00125
0.1
0.5
0.005
Table 5 Statistics of sample detection
Bacterium
Enterococcus
Enterobacterium
Eubacterium
Bifidobacterium
Lactobacillus casei
Lactobacillus acidophilus
Probe
LCR
LDR
LDR
LDR
LCR
LCR
LCR
No. of detected sample
29
77
42
46
23
80
77
Detection rate(%)
35.37
93.90
51.22
84.15
97.56
93.90
Table 6 Detection limits of mixed samples with ligase detection reaction probes
Eubac
LDR
Dilution times
64
32
16
8
4
2
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
Detection result
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
IC 1#
LDR
Dilution times
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
4
8
16
32
64
Detection result
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Bifido
LCR
Dilution times
100
200
400
800
1600
3200
6400
12 800
25 600
Detection result
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
IC 1#
LDR
Dilution times
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Detection result
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Bifido
LCR
Detecion result
128
64
32
16
8
4
2
12
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Dilution times
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
L. casei
LCR
Detection result
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
4
8
16
32
64
128
Dilution times
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
Citation: Tang ZR, Li K, Zhou YX, Xiao ZX, Xiao JH, Huang R, Gu GH. Comparative quantification of human intestinal bacteria based on cPCR and LDR/LCR. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(3): 268-274