Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2012; 18(27): 3578-3584
Published online Jul 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3578
Published online Jul 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3578
Table 1 Baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes of the weekday and weekend groups n (%)
Factors | Weekday | Weekend | P value |
Number of patients | 326 (84.0) | 62 (16.0) | |
Age (yr) | 60.7 ± 0.8 | 55.7 ± 2.1 | 0.023 |
Male | 250 (76.7) | 47 (75.8) | NS |
Gastric ulcer | 221 (68.1) | 43 (69.4) | NS |
Duodenal ulcer | 104 (31.9) | 19 (30.6) | NS |
Active bleeding (Forrest Ia, Ib) | 119 (36.5) | 18 (29.0) | NS |
Rockall score | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 4.7 ± 0.2 | NS |
Charlson score | 3.4 ± 0.1 | 3.1 ± 0.3 | NS |
Comorbidity | 123 (37.7) | 26 (41.9) | NS |
Endoscopic hemostasis | 309 (94.8) | 57 (91.9) | NS |
Time to endoscopy (min) | 338.9 ± 24.9 | 306.8 ± 45.6 | NS |
Rebleeding | 39 (12) | 13 (21) | 0.030 |
Angiographic embolization | 4 (1.2) | 1 (1.6) | NS |
Surgery | 3 (0.9) | 1 (1.6) | NS |
Length of stay (d) | 8.5 ± 0.3 | 6.2 ± 0.5 | 0.009 |
Mortality | 6 (1.8) | 1 (1.6) | NS |
Table 2 Baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes of the daytime and nighttime groups n (%)
Factors | Daytime | Nighttime | P value |
Number of patients | 312 (80) | 76 (20) | |
Age (yr) | 60.3 ± 0.9 | 57.9 ± 1.7 | NS |
Male | 238 (76.2) | 59 (77.6) | NS |
Gastric ulcer | 209 (66.9) | 57 (75.0) | NS |
Duodenal ulcer | 103 (33.0) | 19 (25.0) | NS |
Active bleeding (Forrest Ia, Ib) | 111 (35.5) | 26 (34.2) | NS |
Rockall score | 4.9 ± 0.1 | 4.9 ± 0.2 | NS |
Charlson score | 3.5 ± 0.1 | 3.1 ± 0.3 | NS |
Comorbidity | 119 (38.1) | 30 (39.5) | NS |
Time to endoscopy (min) | 352.9 ± 26.3 | 255.0 ± 30.0 | 0.016 |
Rebleeding | 36 (11.5) | 16 (21.1) | 0.018 |
Angiographic embolization | 3 (0.9) | 2 (2.6) | NS |
Surgery | 4 (1.2) | 0 (0.0) | NS |
Length of stay (d) | 8.3 ± 0.3 | 7.3 ± 0.5 | NS |
Mortality | 6 (1.9) | 1 (1.3) | NS |
Table 3 Significant risk factors for mortality
Risk factor | Alive (n = 381) | Dead (n = 7) | P value |
Comorbidity rate (%) | 37.3 | 100.0 | 0.001 |
Age (yr) | 59.7 ± 0.8 | 72.1 ± 5.3 | 0.037 |
Charlson score | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 7.0 ± 0.7 | < 0.001 |
Rockall score | 4.9 ± 0.1 | 7.6 ± 0.6 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Subgroup analysis according to daytime and nighttime groups n (%)
Weekday | Weekend | |||||
Day (n = 273) | Night (n = 53) | P value | Day (n = 39) | Night (n = 23) | P value | |
Age (yr) | 61.0 ± 0.9 | 58.9 ± 1.9 | NS | 54.8 ± 2.6 | 57.1 ± 3.5 | NS |
Active bleeding (Forrest Ia, Ib) | 99 (36.3) | 20 (37.7) | NS | 12 (31.0) | 6 (26.0) | NS |
Rockall score | 5.0 ± 0.1 | 4.9 ± 0.2 | NS | 4.6 ± 0.3 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | NS |
Charlson score | 3.5 ± 0.1 | 2.9 ± 0.3 | NS | 2.9 ± 0.4 | 3.6 ± 0.7 | NS |
Comorbidity | 102 (37.4) | 21 (39.6) | NS | 17 (43.6) | 9 (39.1) | NS |
Endoscopic hemostasis | 259 (94.9) | 50 (94.3) | NS | 36 (92.3) | 21 (91.3) | NS |
Time to endoscopy (min) | 355.7 ± 28.9 | 252.3 ± 33.0 | 0.020 | 333.7 ± 63.4 | 261.4 ± 60.4 | NS |
Rebleeding | 31 (11.4) | 8 (15.1) | NS | 5 (12.8) | 8 (34.8) | 0.040 |
Angiographic embolization | 3 (1.1) | 1 (1.9) | NS | 0 (0) | 1 (4.3) | NS |
Surgery | 3 (1.1) | 0 (0) | NS | 1 (2.6) | 0 (0) | NS |
Length of stay (d) | 8.6 ± 0.4 | 7.7 ± 0.6 | NS | 6.1 ± 0.7 | 6.5 ± 0.9 | NS |
Mortality | 6 (2.2) | 0 (0) | NS | 0 (0) | 1 (4.3) | NS |
Table 5 Multivariate analysis for risk factors of rebleeding
Risk factor | Rebleeding rate (%) | P value | Odd ratio | 95% confidence interval |
Rockall score (≥ 6)1 | 18 | 0.016 | 2.083 | 1.144-3.791 |
Nighttime | 21 | 0.044 | 2.012 | 1.020-3.968 |
Weekend | 21 | 0.120 | 1.782 | 0.861-3.689 |
- Citation: Youn YH, Park YJ, Kim JH, Jeon TJ, Cho JH, Park H. Weekend and nighttime effect on the prognosis of peptic ulcer bleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(27): 3578-3584
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i27/3578.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3578