Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2012; 18(14): 1635-1641
Published online Apr 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i14.1635
Published online Apr 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i14.1635
Table 1 Patient characteristics
Non-stent | Stent | P value | |
No. of patients | 60 | 60 | - |
Mean age (range) (yr) | 68 (27-92) | 66 (24-88) | 0.35 |
Sex: female/male | 25/35 | 27/33 | 0.46 |
Reasons of high risk | |||
Previous post-ERCP pancreatitis | 5 (8%) | 5 (8%) | 0.65 |
Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | - |
A difficult cannulation | 10 (17%) | 10 (17%) | 0.68 |
Pre-cut | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | - |
Pancreatic sphincterotomy | 5 (8%) | 4 (7%) | 1 |
Pancreatic duct biopsy | 5 (8%) | 6 (10%) | 1 |
IDUS for pancreatic duct | 27 (45%) | 25 (42%) | 0.15 |
Procedure time greater than 30 min | 29 (48%) | 33 (55%) | 0.50 |
Table 2 Final diagnosis n (%)
Non-stent | Stent | P value | |
Biliary disease | |||
CBD stone | 16 (27) | 15 (25) | 0.68 |
Cholangitis | 2 (3) | 2 (3) | 0.49 |
Cholangiocarcinoma | 4 (7) | 3 (5) | 1 |
Cholangiocellular carcinoma | 2 (3) | 1 (2) | 1 |
Benign biliary stricture | 1 (2) | 2 (3) | 1 |
Primary sclerosing cholangitis | 2 (3) | 1 (2) | 1 |
GB stone | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 1 |
GB polyp | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 1 |
GB adenomyomatosis | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0.46 |
Cholecystitis | 1 (2) | 1 (2) | 0.46 |
GB carcinoma | 3 (5) | 3 (5) | 0.47 |
Pancreatic disease | |||
IPMN | 10 (17) | 11 (18) | 0.67 |
MCN | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | 1 |
SCN | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 1 |
Chronic pancreatitis | 3 (5) | 3 (5) | 0.47 |
Pancreatic cyst | 1 (2) | 2 (3) | 1 |
Pancreatic carcinoma | 11 (18) | 13 (22) | 0.65 |
Table 3 Placement of the pancreatic duct stent
No. of patients | 60 |
Success rate in stent placement | 100% |
Rate of spontaneous stent dislodgement | 96.7% |
Duration time to dislodgement, d, (range) | 2.1 (23) |
Complications | |
Stent migration | 0% |
Post-ERCP pancreatitis | 1.7% |
Hyperamylasemia | 30% |
Hemorrhage | 0% |
Perforation | 0% |
Infection (cholangitis, cholecystitis) | 0% |
Others | 0% |
Mean serum amylase level after procedures, U/L, (range) | 1246 (746-1964) |
Table 4 Overall post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in non-stent and stent groups
Non-stent | Stent | P value | |
No. of patients | 60 | 60 | |
Hyperamylasemia | 23 (38.3%) | 18 (30%) | 0.862 |
Average serum amylase level (IU/L) (range) | 842.4 (381-2040) | 746.2 (420-1620) | 0.798 |
Post-ERCP pancreatitis | 8 (13.3%) | 1 (1.7%) | 0.0322 |
Mild | 8 | 1 | 0.0322 |
Moderate | 0 | 0 | - |
Severe | 0 | 0 | - |
Average serum amylase level in pancreatitis cases (IU/L) (range) | 1720 (820-2040) | 1240 (746-1964) | 0.04 |
Table 5 Final diagnoses in post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis patients
Non-stent | Pancreatitis | Stent | Pancreatitis | |
Biliary disease | ||||
CBD stone | 16 | 3 (19%) | 15 | 0 |
Cholangitis | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Cholangiocarcinoma | 4 | 1 (25%) | 3 | 0 |
Cholangiocellular carcinoma | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Benign biliary stricture | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Primary sclerosing cholangitis | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
GB stone | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
GB polyp | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
GB adenomyomatosis | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Cholecystitis | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
GB carcinoma | 3 | 1 (33%) | 3 | 0 |
Pancreatic disease | ||||
IPMN | 10 | 1 (10%) | 11 | 0 |
MCN | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
SCN | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Chronic pancreatitis | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
Pancreatic cyst | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Pancreatic carcinoma | 11 | 2 (18%) | 13 | 1 (8%) |
Table 6 Analysis of risk factors for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis n (%)
Non-stent | Pancreatitis | Stent | Pancreatitis | Univariate P value | |
No. of patients | 60 | 8 | 60 | 1 | |
Age (< 60 yr) | 17 (28) | 3 (18) | 18 (30) | 0 (0) | 0.72 |
Female | 25 (42) | 3 (12) | 27 (45) | 0 (0) | 0.78 |
Previous post-ERCP pancreatitis | 5 (8) | 1 (20) | 5 (8) | 0 (0) | 0.68 |
Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | - |
A difficult cannulation | 10 (17) | 2 (20) | 10 (17) | 0 (0) | 0.68 |
Pre-cut | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | - |
Pancreatic sphincterotomy | 5 (8) | 1 (20) | 4 (7) | 0 (0) | 0.68 |
Pancreatic duct biopsy | 5 (8) | 1 (20) | 6 (10) | 1 (17) | 0.87 |
IDUS for pancreatic duct | 27 (45) | 3 (11) | 25 (42) | 1 (4) | 0.74 |
Procedure time greater than 30 min | 29 (48) | 4 (14) | 33 (55) | 0 (0) | 0.72 |
- Citation: Kawaguchi Y, Ogawa M, Omata F, Ito H, Shimosegawa T, Mine T. Randomized controlled trial of pancreatic stenting to prevent pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(14): 1635-1641
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i14/1635.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i14.1635