Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2012; 18(1): 49-54
Published online Jan 7, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i1.49
Published online Jan 7, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i1.49
Table 1 Clinical findings [n = 403, n (%) or mean ± SD]
Gender | Female | 96 (23.8) |
Male | 307 (76.2) | |
Age at OP (yr) | 63.8 ± 7.6 | |
OP type | B-I | 165 (40.9) |
B-II | 134 (33.3) | |
R-Y | 104 (25.8) | |
Extent of gastrectomy | Subtotal (B-I, B-II) | 299 (74.2) |
Total (R-Y) | 104 (25.8) | |
Duodenal bypass | Bypass – (B-I) | 165 (40.9) |
Bypass + (B-II, R-Y) | 238 (59.1) | |
Pre-OP BMI (kg/m2) | 24.7 ± 3.0 (18.4-39.9) | |
Current BMI (kg/m2) | 22.2 ± 2.9 (13.5-35.3) | |
BMI reduction ratio1 (%) | 9.8 ± 8.6 | |
Pre-OP | Oral diabetic agent | 368 (91.3) |
diabetic therapy | Insulin | 35 (8.7) |
F/U duration (mo) | 33.7 ± 20.6 (5.5-81.8) | |
Diabetes course | Worse | 38 (9.9) |
Same | 172 (44.7) | |
Improvement | 117 (30.4) | |
Resolution | 58 (15.1) |
Table 2 Univariate analysis [n = 403, n (%) or mean ± SD]
Diabetes course | P value | |||||
Worse | Same | Improvement | Resolution | |||
Gender | Female | 8 (8.6) | 36 (38.7) | 34 (36.6) | 15 (16.1) | 0.180 |
Male | 30 (10.3) | 136 (46.6) | 83 (28.4) | 43 (14.7) | ||
Age at OP (yr) | 62.6 ± 7.6 | 64.2 ± 7.4 | 63.5 ± 7.4 | 62.5 ± 8.4 | 0.453 | |
OP type | B-Ia | 20 (12.4) | 82 (50.9) | 42 (26.1) | 17 (10.6) | 0.001 |
B-IIa | 10 (8.0) | 59 (47.2) | 42 (33.6) | 14 (11.2) | 0.006 | |
R-Y | 8 (8.1) | 31 (31.3) | 33 (33.3) | 27 (27.3) | ||
Extent of gastrectomy | B-I and B-II (subtotal) | 30 (10.5) | 141 (49.3) | 84 (29.4) | 31 (10.8) | < 0.001 |
R-Y (total) | 8 (8.1) | 31 (31.3) | 33 (33.3) | 27 (27.3) | ||
Duodenal bypass | B-I (bypass -) | 20 (12.4) | 82 (50.9) | 42 (26.1) | 17 (10.6) | 0.002 |
B-II and R-Y (bypass +) | 18 (8.0) | 90 (40.2) | 75 (33.5) | 41 (18.3) | ||
Pre-OP BMI (kg/m2) | 23.4 ± 2.5 | 24.9 ± 2.6 | 24.8 ± 3.5 | 24.9 ± 3.5 | 0.127 | |
Current BMI (kg/m2) | 21.7 ± 2.7 | 22.7 ± 2.6 | 22.2 ± 3.2 | 21.2 ± 2.9 | 0.038 | |
BMI reduction ratio1 (%) | 6.8 ± 10.2 | 8.5 ± 7.3 | 10.4 ± 8.7 | 14.4 ± 8.5 | < 0.001 | |
Pre-OP diabetic | Oral diabetic agent | 38 (10.8) | 159 (45.3) | 99 (28.2) | 55 (15.7) | 0.147 |
regimen | Insulin | 0 (0.0) | 13 (38.2) | 18 (52.9) | 3 (8.8) | |
F/U duration (mo) | 36.4 ± 18.2 | 37.2 ± 21.6 | 30.0 ± 20.1 | 28.3 ± 17.8 | 0.001 |
Table 3 Multivariate analysis (n = 403)
P value | B-estimation | SE | Contribution degree | |
Current BMI (kg/m2) | 0.454 | 0.028 | 0.037 | |
BMI reduction ratio1 (%) | < 0.001 | 0.051 | 0.013 | 3.948 |
F/U duration (mo) | 0.007 | -0.013 | 0.005 | -2.703 |
OP type | ||||
B-I | 0.006 | -0.714 | 0.258 | -2.770 |
B-II | 0.070 | -0.473 | 0.262 | |
R-Y | ||||
Current BMI (kg/m2) | 0.478 | 0.026 | 0.037 | |
BMI reduction ratio1 (%) | < 0.001 | 0.052 | 0.013 | 4.031 |
F/U duration (mo) | 0.006 | -0.013 | 0.005 | -2.727 |
Extent of gastrectomy | ||||
Subtotal (B-I, B-II) | 0.011 | -0.597 | 0.234 | -2.553 |
Total (R-Y) | ||||
Current BMI (kg/m2) | 0.657 | 0.016 | 0.037 | |
BMI reduction ratio1(%) | < 0.001 | 0.054 | 0.013 | 4.181 |
F/U duration (mo) | 0.005 | -0.013 | 0.005 | -2.811 |
Duodenal bypass | ||||
Bypass – (B-I) | 0.039 | -0.416 | 0.202 | -2.061 |
Bypass + (B-II, R-Y) |
Table 4 Clinical findings in subgroup analysis [body mass index reduction ratio < 10%, n = 206, n (%) or mean ± SD]
Gender | Female | 38 (18.4) |
Male | 168 (81.6) | |
Age at OP (yr) | ||
OP type | B-I | 105 (51.0) |
B-II | 68 (33.0) | |
R-Y | 33 (16.0) | |
Extent of gastrectomy | Subtotal (B-I, B-II) | 173 (84.0) |
Total (R-Y) | 33 (16.0) | |
Duodenal bypass | Bypass – (B-I) | 105 (51.0) |
Bypass + (B-II, R-Y) | 101 (49.0) | |
Pre-OP BMI (kg/m2) | 23.8 ± 2.8 (18.4-32.6) | |
Current BMI (kg/m2) | 23.0 ± 2.7 (21.8-32.5) | |
BMI reduction ratio1 (%) | 3.4 ± 5.4 | |
Pre-OP diabetic regimen | Oral diabetic agent | 186 (90.3) |
Insulin | 20 (9.7) | |
F/U duration (mo) | 35.7 ± 20.7 (5.5-81.1) | |
Diabetes course | Worse | 24 (12.1) |
Same | 102 (51.5) | |
Improvement | 57 (28.8) | |
Resolution | 15 (7.6) |
Table 5 Subgroup analysis [body mass index reduction ratio < 10%, n = 206, n (%) or mean ± SD]
Diabetes course | P value | |||||
Worse | Same | Improvement | Remission | |||
Gender | Female | 3 (8.1) | 17 (45.9) | 14 (37.8) | 3 (8.1) | 0.190 |
Male | 21 (13.0) | 85 (52.8) | 43 (26.7) | 12 (7.5) | ||
Age at OP (yr) | 61.9 ± 8.1 | 63.9 ± 8.0 | 63.8 ± 7.5 | 61.1 ± 9.3 | 0.976 | |
OP type | B-Ia | 14 (13.5) | 56 (53.8) | 27 (26.0) | 7 (6.7) | 0.076 |
B-IIa | 7 (11.3) | 33 (53.2) | 18 (29.0) | 4 (6.5) | 0.181 | |
R-Y | 3 (9.4) | 13 (40.6) | 12 (37.5) | 4 (12.5) | ||
Extent of gastrectomy | Subtotal (B-I, B-II) | 21 (12.7) | 89 (53.6) | 45 (27.1) | 11 (6.6) | 0.084 |
Total (R-Y) | 3 (9.4) | 13 (40.6) | 12 (37.5) | 4 (12.5) | ||
Duodenal bypass | Bypass – (B-I) | 14 (13.5) | 56 (53.8) | 27 (26.0) | 7 (6.7) | 0.250 |
Bypass + (B-II, R-Y) | 10 (10.6) | 46 (48.9) | 30 (31.9) | 8 (8.5) | ||
Pre-OP BMI (kg/m2) | 22.7 ± 2.3 | 24.3 ± 2.7 | 23.8 ± 3.0 | 22.2 ± 2.8 | 0.615 | |
Current BMI (kg/m2) | 22.3 ± 2.2 | 23.4 ± 2.6 | 23.0 ± 3.1 | 21.3 ± 2.6 | 0.310 | |
BMI reduction ratio1 (%) | 1.5 ± 6.6 | 3.7 ± 4.5 | 3.6 ± 5.9 | 4.2 ± 4.6 | 0.183 | |
Pre-OP | Oral diabetic agent | 24 (13.5) | 93 (52.2) | 47 (26.4) | 14 (7.9) | 0.080 |
diabetic | ||||||
regimen | Insulin | 0 (0.0) | 9 (45.0) | 10 (50.0) | 1 (5.0) | |
F/U duration (mo) | 37.7 ± 17.6 | 38.8 ± 21.7 | 30.7 ± 20.7 | 28.7 ± 14.1 | 0.022 |
- Citation: Kim JW, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Outcome after gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients with type 2 diabetes. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18(1): 49-54
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v18/i1/49.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i1.49