Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 21, 2011; 17(7): 867-897
Published online Feb 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i7.867
Published online Feb 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i7.867
Table 1 Summary of the terms used singly or in combination for evidence acquisition
Primary MeSH terms | Secondary MeSH terms (epidemiology, diagnosis) | Secondary MeSH terms (treatment, palliation) |
Pancreatic neoplasm(s) | Epidemiology | Pancreaticoduodenectomy |
Adenocarcinoma(s) | Classification | Resection |
Carcinoma(s) | Diagnosis | Therapeutic(s) |
Pancreatic diseases | Differential diagnosis | Treatment outcome(s) |
Pancreas | Risk factor(s) | Surgery |
Carcinoma, pancreatic ductal | Diagnostic imaging | Surgical procedures |
Pancreatic duct(s) | Magnetic resonance imaging | Clinical trial(s) |
Humans | Endosonography | Controlled clinical trial(s) |
Adult | Ultrasonography | Randomized controlled trial(s) |
Emission computed tomography | Clinical trial (phase I) | |
Radionuclide imaging | Clinical trial (phase II) | |
Positron emission tomography | Clinical trial (phase III) | |
Tomography | Clinical trial (phase IV) | |
X-ray computed | Drug therapy | |
Biopsy (fine needle) | Chemotherapy | |
Biopsy (needle) | Neoadjuvant therapy | |
Cytology | Adjuvant | |
Cytodiagnosis | Antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols | |
Tumor markers (biological) antigen(s) | Antineoplastic agent(s) | |
Carcinoembryonic antigen | Antimetabolites, antineoplastic | |
Ca 19-9 antigen | Combined modality therapeutic antineoplastic | |
Ca 125 antigen | Combined chemotherapy protocols neoadjuvant | |
Antigens, tumor-associated, carbohydrate | Therapy | |
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography | Radiotherapy | |
Computed assisted image processing | Drainage | |
Sensitivity and specificity | Cholestasis | |
Endoscopy | Obstructive jaundice | |
Celiac plexus | ||
Autonomic nerve block | ||
Nerve block | ||
Ethanol | ||
Injections, intralesional | ||
Cisplatin | ||
Deoxycytidine | ||
Epidermal growth factor | ||
Fluorouracil | ||
Endostatin | ||
Biological products | ||
Neoplasm proteins | ||
Immunotherapy | ||
Antibodies, monoclonal |
Table 2 Known risk factors for pancreatic cancer
Age (more than 60 yr) |
Smoking |
Diabetes |
Type II |
Gestational diabetes |
Impaired glucose tolerance |
Alcohol |
Pancreatitis |
Acute |
Chronic |
Genetic predisposition |
Family history |
Hereditary disorders |
Hereditary pancreatitis |
Puetz-Jeghers syndrome |
FAMMM |
Familial breast and ovarian cancer |
Li-Fraumeni syndrome |
Fanconi anaemia |
Ataxia-telangiectasia |
Familial adenomatous polyposis |
Cystic fibrosis |
HNPCC |
Lynch syndrome |
Obesity |
Table 3 clinico-pathological features of the most frequent classes of pancreatic cancer
Classification | Frequency (%) | Author | yr | Survival (5-yr survival after surgical resection) |
DIA (incidence per 100 000 patients at risk = 8.37)[69] | 85-90[1] | Conlon et al[70] | 1996 | 10% |
Winter et al[71] | 2006 | 18% | ||
Poultsides et al[72] | 2010 | 19% | ||
SPPN (incidence per 100 000 patients at risk = NA)[69] | 0.1-3[73] | Papavramidis et al[74] | 2005 | 95% |
IPMN (incidence per 100 000 patients at risk = 0.03)[69] | Shin et al[76] | 2010 | Benign: 95% | |
Malignant: 64% | ||||
IPMN with simultaneous DIA: (incidence per 100 000 patients at risk = NA)[69] | 5[75] | Poultsides et al[72] | 2010 | 42% |
Fan et al[77] | 2010 | 57% | ||
Sohn et al[78] | 2004 | 43% | ||
Pancreatoblastoma (incidence per 100 000 patients at risk = NA)[69] | 0.50[79] | Dhebri et al[80] | 2004 | 50% |
Saif et al[79] | 2007 | 80% | ||
Undifferentiated (incidence per 100 000 patients at risk = 0.03)[69] | 2-7[81] | Paal et al[82] | 2001 | 3% (3-yr survival) |
Connolly et al[83] | 1987 | 5 mo (average survival) | ||
Medullary carcinoma (incidence per 100 000 patients at risk = NA)[69] | NA | Wilentz et al[84] | 2000 | 11% |
14 mo (average survival) | ||||
Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma (incidence per 100 000 patients at risk = 0.43)[69] | 1 | Ridder et al[85] | 1996 | 56% |
Adenosquamous carcinoma (incidence per 100 000 patients at risk = 0.05)[69] | 4 | Madura et al[86] | 1999 | 5-7 mo (median survival) |
Mulkeen et al[87] | 2006 | |||
Acinar cell carcinoma (incidence per 100 000 patients at risk = 0.02)[69] | 2 | Holen et al[88] | 2002 | 38 mo after surgical resection (median survival) |
14 mo for unresectable disease (median survival) |
Table 4 Presenting symptoms of advanced pancreatic cancer
Symptom | Percentage |
Abdominal pain | 78-82 |
Anorexia | 64 |
Early satiety | 62 |
Jaundice | 56-80 |
Sleep disorders | 54 |
Weight loss | 66-84 |
Diabetes | 97 |
Back pain | 48 |
Nausea and weight loss | 50-86 |
Table 5 Summary of the performance characteristics of serum tumor markers for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer
Serum tumor marker | Author | Yr | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Accuracy (%) |
CA19-9 | Boeck et al[141] | 2006 | 70-90 | 43-91 | 72 | 81 | 67 |
Ni et al[142] | 2005 | ||||||
Steinberg et al[143] | 1990 | ||||||
Safi et al[144] | 1997 | ||||||
Mu et al[162] | 2003 | ||||||
CEA in pancreatic juice | Ozkan et al[155] | 2003 | NA | NA | 77 | 95 | 85 |
Futakawa et al[154] | 2000 | ||||||
Ni et al[142] | 2005 | ||||||
CEA in serum | Boeck et al[141] | 2006 | 45 | 75 | NA | NA | NA |
CA19-9 + CEA | Ni et al[142] | 2005 | 37 | 84 | 91 | 90 | 89 |
Ozkan et al[155] | 2003 | ||||||
Ma et al[163] | 2009 | ||||||
CA 242 | Nilsson et al[160] | 1992 | 60 | 76 | 63 | 61 | 71 |
Röthlin et al[164] | 1993 | ||||||
Carpelan-Holmström et al[165] | 2002 | ||||||
Pålsson et al[166] | 1993 | ||||||
CEA + CA 242 | Ni et al[142] | 2005 | 34 | 92 | 67 | 90 | 87 |
Ozkan et al[155] | 2003 | ||||||
Hall et al[167] | 1994 | ||||||
CA19-9 + CA 242 | Ni et al[142] | 2005 | 59 | 77 | 65.3 | 87.8 | 65.1 |
Röthlin et al[164] | 1993 | ||||||
Jiang et al[158] | 2004 | ||||||
CA19-9 + CA 242 + CEA | Ni et al[142] | 2005 | 29 | 96 | NA | NA | NA |
Table 6 Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of computed tomography findings in pancreatic cancer patients
CT finding | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) |
Hypoattenuation | 75 | 84 | 81 |
Ductal dilatation | 50 | 78 | 70 |
Ductal interruption | 45 | 82 | 70 |
Distal pancreatic atrophy | 45 | 96 | 81 |
Pancreatic contour anomalies | 15 | 92 | 70 |
CBD dilatation | 5 | 92 | 67 |
Table 7 Summary of the performance characteristics of imaging tests for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer
Diagnostic modality | Author | Yr | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Accuracy (%) |
US | Giovannini et al[176] | 1994 | 48-95 | 40-91 | 92 | 100 | 46-64 |
Böttger et al[177] | 1998 | ||||||
Rösch et al[178] | 1991 | ||||||
Niederau et al[179] | 1992 | ||||||
Palazzo et al[180] | 1993 | ||||||
Tanaka et al[231] | 1996 | ||||||
Doppler US | Candiani et al[232] | 1998 | 50-94 | 80-100 | 79 | 88 | 81-95 |
Casadei et al[184] | 1998 | ||||||
Calculli et al[233] | 2002 | ||||||
EUS | Akahoshi et al[234] | 1998 | 98 | 97 | 94 | 100 | 90 |
Legmann et al[235] | 1998 | ||||||
Contrast enhanced US | Dietrich et al[185] | 2008 | 90 | 100 | 100 | 86 | 93 |
CT | Bronstein et al[196] | 2004 | 77 | 100 | NA | NA | 73 |
Megibow et al[197] | 1995 | ||||||
MDCT | Park et al[214] | 2009 | 83-91 | 63-75 | 80 | 87 | 85-95 |
Vargas et al[202] | 2004 | ||||||
Diehl et al[203] | 1998 | ||||||
Schima et al[208] | 2002 | ||||||
MRI-MRCP | Andersson et al[212] | 2005 | 83-92 | 63-85 | 95 | 79 | 89 |
PET | Maemura et al[217] | 2006 | 87-100 | 67-77 | 94 | 100 | 85-95 |
Delbeke et al[221] | 1999 |
Table 8 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging of pancreatic cancer
AJCC 6th edition TNM staging system for pancreatic cancer | ||
TX | Primary tumor cannot be assessed | |
T0 | No evidence of primary tumor | |
Tis | Carcinoma in situ | |
T1 | Tumor limited to the pancreas, 2 cm or less in greatest diameter | |
T2 | Tumor limited to the pancreas, greater than 2 cm at greatest diameter | |
T3 | Tumor extends beyond pancreas but no involvement of celiac axis or superior mestenteric artery | |
T4 | Tumor involves the celiac axis or the superior mestenteric artery (unresectable) | |
NX | Regional nodes cannot be assessed | |
N0 | No regional lymph node metastasis | |
N1 | Regional lymph node metastasis | |
MX | Distant metastasis cannot be assessed | |
M0 | No distant metastasis | |
M1 | Distant metastasis | |
Stage grouping | ||
Stage 0 | Tis N0 M0 | Localized within pancreas |
Stage IA | T1 N0 M0 | Localized within pancreas |
Stage IB | T2 N0 M0 | Localized within pancreas |
Stage IIA | T3 N0 M0 | Locally invasive, resectable |
Stage IIB | T1, 2, or 3 N1 M0 | Locally invasive, resectable |
Stage III | T4 Any N M0 | Locally advanced, unresectable |
Stage IV | Any T Any N M1 | Distant metastases |
Table 9 Stage distribution of pancreatic cancer and 5-year relative survival by stage at diagnosis for 1999-2006, all races and both sexes (SEER registries)
Stage at diagnosis | Stage distribution (%) | 5-yr relative survival (%) |
Localized (confirmed to primary site) | 8 | 22.5 |
Regional (spread to regional LNs) | 26 | 8.8 |
Distant (cancer had metastasized) | 53 | 1.9 |
Unknown (unstaged) | 14 | 5 |
Table 10 Published results on laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomies
Table 11 Survival data after resection of pancreatic cancer
Author | Yr | Resection (n) | R0 resection (n) | Overall 5-yr survival (%) | R0 5-yr survival (%) | Median survival (mo) |
Fatima et al[371] | 2010 | 617 | 468 | 17.4 | 20 | 18 |
Kato et al[376] | 2009 | 138 | 115 | 9.9 | 13.2 | 12.3 |
Raut et al[373] | 2007 | 360 | 300 | NA | NA | 24.9 |
Cameron et al[258] | 2006 | 1000 | NA | 18 | 23 | 33 |
Shimada et al[372] | 2006 | 88 | 66 | 19 | 26 | 22 |
Howard et al[375] | 2006 | 126 | 158 | 4 | 67 | 18 |
Moon et al[374] | 2003 | 81 | 20 | 10.8 | 67.8 | 11.8 |
- Citation: Sharma C, Eltawil KM, Renfrew PD, Walsh MJ, Molinari M. Advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of pancreatic carcinoma: 1990-2010. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(7): 867-897
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i7/867.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i7.867