Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 21, 2011; 17(7): 867-897
Published online Feb 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i7.867
Published online Feb 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i7.867
Table 1 Summary of the terms used singly or in combination for evidence acquisition
| Primary MeSH terms | Secondary MeSH terms (epidemiology, diagnosis) | Secondary MeSH terms (treatment, palliation) |
| Pancreatic neoplasm(s) | Epidemiology | Pancreaticoduodenectomy |
| Adenocarcinoma(s) | Classification | Resection |
| Carcinoma(s) | Diagnosis | Therapeutic(s) |
| Pancreatic diseases | Differential diagnosis | Treatment outcome(s) |
| Pancreas | Risk factor(s) | Surgery |
| Carcinoma, pancreatic ductal | Diagnostic imaging | Surgical procedures |
| Pancreatic duct(s) | Magnetic resonance imaging | Clinical trial(s) |
| Humans | Endosonography | Controlled clinical trial(s) |
| Adult | Ultrasonography | Randomized controlled trial(s) |
| Emission computed tomography | Clinical trial (phase I) | |
| Radionuclide imaging | Clinical trial (phase II) | |
| Positron emission tomography | Clinical trial (phase III) | |
| Tomography | Clinical trial (phase IV) | |
| X-ray computed | Drug therapy | |
| Biopsy (fine needle) | Chemotherapy | |
| Biopsy (needle) | Neoadjuvant therapy | |
| Cytology | Adjuvant | |
| Cytodiagnosis | Antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols | |
| Tumor markers (biological) antigen(s) | Antineoplastic agent(s) | |
| Carcinoembryonic antigen | Antimetabolites, antineoplastic | |
| Ca 19-9 antigen | Combined modality therapeutic antineoplastic | |
| Ca 125 antigen | Combined chemotherapy protocols neoadjuvant | |
| Antigens, tumor-associated, carbohydrate | Therapy | |
| Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography | Radiotherapy | |
| Computed assisted image processing | Drainage | |
| Sensitivity and specificity | Cholestasis | |
| Endoscopy | Obstructive jaundice | |
| Celiac plexus | ||
| Autonomic nerve block | ||
| Nerve block | ||
| Ethanol | ||
| Injections, intralesional | ||
| Cisplatin | ||
| Deoxycytidine | ||
| Epidermal growth factor | ||
| Fluorouracil | ||
| Endostatin | ||
| Biological products | ||
| Neoplasm proteins | ||
| Immunotherapy | ||
| Antibodies, monoclonal |
Table 2 Known risk factors for pancreatic cancer
| Age (more than 60 yr) |
| Smoking |
| Diabetes |
| Type II |
| Gestational diabetes |
| Impaired glucose tolerance |
| Alcohol |
| Pancreatitis |
| Acute |
| Chronic |
| Genetic predisposition |
| Family history |
| Hereditary disorders |
| Hereditary pancreatitis |
| Puetz-Jeghers syndrome |
| FAMMM |
| Familial breast and ovarian cancer |
| Li-Fraumeni syndrome |
| Fanconi anaemia |
| Ataxia-telangiectasia |
| Familial adenomatous polyposis |
| Cystic fibrosis |
| HNPCC |
| Lynch syndrome |
| Obesity |
Table 3 clinico-pathological features of the most frequent classes of pancreatic cancer
| Classification | Frequency (%) | Author | yr | Survival (5-yr survival after surgical resection) |
| DIA (incidence per 100 000 patients at risk = 8.37)[69] | 85-90[1] | Conlon et al[70] | 1996 | 10% |
| Winter et al[71] | 2006 | 18% | ||
| Poultsides et al[72] | 2010 | 19% | ||
| SPPN (incidence per 100 000 patients at risk = NA)[69] | 0.1-3[73] | Papavramidis et al[74] | 2005 | 95% |
| IPMN (incidence per 100 000 patients at risk = 0.03)[69] | Shin et al[76] | 2010 | Benign: 95% | |
| Malignant: 64% | ||||
| IPMN with simultaneous DIA: (incidence per 100 000 patients at risk = NA)[69] | 5[75] | Poultsides et al[72] | 2010 | 42% |
| Fan et al[77] | 2010 | 57% | ||
| Sohn et al[78] | 2004 | 43% | ||
| Pancreatoblastoma (incidence per 100 000 patients at risk = NA)[69] | 0.50[79] | Dhebri et al[80] | 2004 | 50% |
| Saif et al[79] | 2007 | 80% | ||
| Undifferentiated (incidence per 100 000 patients at risk = 0.03)[69] | 2-7[81] | Paal et al[82] | 2001 | 3% (3-yr survival) |
| Connolly et al[83] | 1987 | 5 mo (average survival) | ||
| Medullary carcinoma (incidence per 100 000 patients at risk = NA)[69] | NA | Wilentz et al[84] | 2000 | 11% |
| 14 mo (average survival) | ||||
| Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma (incidence per 100 000 patients at risk = 0.43)[69] | 1 | Ridder et al[85] | 1996 | 56% |
| Adenosquamous carcinoma (incidence per 100 000 patients at risk = 0.05)[69] | 4 | Madura et al[86] | 1999 | 5-7 mo (median survival) |
| Mulkeen et al[87] | 2006 | |||
| Acinar cell carcinoma (incidence per 100 000 patients at risk = 0.02)[69] | 2 | Holen et al[88] | 2002 | 38 mo after surgical resection (median survival) |
| 14 mo for unresectable disease (median survival) |
Table 4 Presenting symptoms of advanced pancreatic cancer
| Symptom | Percentage |
| Abdominal pain | 78-82 |
| Anorexia | 64 |
| Early satiety | 62 |
| Jaundice | 56-80 |
| Sleep disorders | 54 |
| Weight loss | 66-84 |
| Diabetes | 97 |
| Back pain | 48 |
| Nausea and weight loss | 50-86 |
Table 5 Summary of the performance characteristics of serum tumor markers for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer
| Serum tumor marker | Author | Yr | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Accuracy (%) |
| CA19-9 | Boeck et al[141] | 2006 | 70-90 | 43-91 | 72 | 81 | 67 |
| Ni et al[142] | 2005 | ||||||
| Steinberg et al[143] | 1990 | ||||||
| Safi et al[144] | 1997 | ||||||
| Mu et al[162] | 2003 | ||||||
| CEA in pancreatic juice | Ozkan et al[155] | 2003 | NA | NA | 77 | 95 | 85 |
| Futakawa et al[154] | 2000 | ||||||
| Ni et al[142] | 2005 | ||||||
| CEA in serum | Boeck et al[141] | 2006 | 45 | 75 | NA | NA | NA |
| CA19-9 + CEA | Ni et al[142] | 2005 | 37 | 84 | 91 | 90 | 89 |
| Ozkan et al[155] | 2003 | ||||||
| Ma et al[163] | 2009 | ||||||
| CA 242 | Nilsson et al[160] | 1992 | 60 | 76 | 63 | 61 | 71 |
| Röthlin et al[164] | 1993 | ||||||
| Carpelan-Holmström et al[165] | 2002 | ||||||
| Pålsson et al[166] | 1993 | ||||||
| CEA + CA 242 | Ni et al[142] | 2005 | 34 | 92 | 67 | 90 | 87 |
| Ozkan et al[155] | 2003 | ||||||
| Hall et al[167] | 1994 | ||||||
| CA19-9 + CA 242 | Ni et al[142] | 2005 | 59 | 77 | 65.3 | 87.8 | 65.1 |
| Röthlin et al[164] | 1993 | ||||||
| Jiang et al[158] | 2004 | ||||||
| CA19-9 + CA 242 + CEA | Ni et al[142] | 2005 | 29 | 96 | NA | NA | NA |
Table 6 Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of computed tomography findings in pancreatic cancer patients
| CT finding | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) |
| Hypoattenuation | 75 | 84 | 81 |
| Ductal dilatation | 50 | 78 | 70 |
| Ductal interruption | 45 | 82 | 70 |
| Distal pancreatic atrophy | 45 | 96 | 81 |
| Pancreatic contour anomalies | 15 | 92 | 70 |
| CBD dilatation | 5 | 92 | 67 |
Table 7 Summary of the performance characteristics of imaging tests for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer
| Diagnostic modality | Author | Yr | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Accuracy (%) |
| US | Giovannini et al[176] | 1994 | 48-95 | 40-91 | 92 | 100 | 46-64 |
| Böttger et al[177] | 1998 | ||||||
| Rösch et al[178] | 1991 | ||||||
| Niederau et al[179] | 1992 | ||||||
| Palazzo et al[180] | 1993 | ||||||
| Tanaka et al[231] | 1996 | ||||||
| Doppler US | Candiani et al[232] | 1998 | 50-94 | 80-100 | 79 | 88 | 81-95 |
| Casadei et al[184] | 1998 | ||||||
| Calculli et al[233] | 2002 | ||||||
| EUS | Akahoshi et al[234] | 1998 | 98 | 97 | 94 | 100 | 90 |
| Legmann et al[235] | 1998 | ||||||
| Contrast enhanced US | Dietrich et al[185] | 2008 | 90 | 100 | 100 | 86 | 93 |
| CT | Bronstein et al[196] | 2004 | 77 | 100 | NA | NA | 73 |
| Megibow et al[197] | 1995 | ||||||
| MDCT | Park et al[214] | 2009 | 83-91 | 63-75 | 80 | 87 | 85-95 |
| Vargas et al[202] | 2004 | ||||||
| Diehl et al[203] | 1998 | ||||||
| Schima et al[208] | 2002 | ||||||
| MRI-MRCP | Andersson et al[212] | 2005 | 83-92 | 63-85 | 95 | 79 | 89 |
| PET | Maemura et al[217] | 2006 | 87-100 | 67-77 | 94 | 100 | 85-95 |
| Delbeke et al[221] | 1999 |
Table 8 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging of pancreatic cancer
| AJCC 6th edition TNM staging system for pancreatic cancer | ||
| TX | Primary tumor cannot be assessed | |
| T0 | No evidence of primary tumor | |
| Tis | Carcinoma in situ | |
| T1 | Tumor limited to the pancreas, 2 cm or less in greatest diameter | |
| T2 | Tumor limited to the pancreas, greater than 2 cm at greatest diameter | |
| T3 | Tumor extends beyond pancreas but no involvement of celiac axis or superior mestenteric artery | |
| T4 | Tumor involves the celiac axis or the superior mestenteric artery (unresectable) | |
| NX | Regional nodes cannot be assessed | |
| N0 | No regional lymph node metastasis | |
| N1 | Regional lymph node metastasis | |
| MX | Distant metastasis cannot be assessed | |
| M0 | No distant metastasis | |
| M1 | Distant metastasis | |
| Stage grouping | ||
| Stage 0 | Tis N0 M0 | Localized within pancreas |
| Stage IA | T1 N0 M0 | Localized within pancreas |
| Stage IB | T2 N0 M0 | Localized within pancreas |
| Stage IIA | T3 N0 M0 | Locally invasive, resectable |
| Stage IIB | T1, 2, or 3 N1 M0 | Locally invasive, resectable |
| Stage III | T4 Any N M0 | Locally advanced, unresectable |
| Stage IV | Any T Any N M1 | Distant metastases |
Table 9 Stage distribution of pancreatic cancer and 5-year relative survival by stage at diagnosis for 1999-2006, all races and both sexes (SEER registries)
| Stage at diagnosis | Stage distribution (%) | 5-yr relative survival (%) |
| Localized (confirmed to primary site) | 8 | 22.5 |
| Regional (spread to regional LNs) | 26 | 8.8 |
| Distant (cancer had metastasized) | 53 | 1.9 |
| Unknown (unstaged) | 14 | 5 |
Table 10 Published results on laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomies
Table 11 Survival data after resection of pancreatic cancer
| Author | Yr | Resection (n) | R0 resection (n) | Overall 5-yr survival (%) | R0 5-yr survival (%) | Median survival (mo) |
| Fatima et al[371] | 2010 | 617 | 468 | 17.4 | 20 | 18 |
| Kato et al[376] | 2009 | 138 | 115 | 9.9 | 13.2 | 12.3 |
| Raut et al[373] | 2007 | 360 | 300 | NA | NA | 24.9 |
| Cameron et al[258] | 2006 | 1000 | NA | 18 | 23 | 33 |
| Shimada et al[372] | 2006 | 88 | 66 | 19 | 26 | 22 |
| Howard et al[375] | 2006 | 126 | 158 | 4 | 67 | 18 |
| Moon et al[374] | 2003 | 81 | 20 | 10.8 | 67.8 | 11.8 |
- Citation: Sharma C, Eltawil KM, Renfrew PD, Walsh MJ, Molinari M. Advances in diagnosis, treatment and palliation of pancreatic carcinoma: 1990-2010. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(7): 867-897
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i7/867.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i7.867
