Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2011; 17(6): 809-816
Published online Feb 14, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i6.809
Published online Feb 14, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i6.809
Table 1 Characteristics of colorectal cancer patients in this study
| Terms | n (%) |
| No. of patients | 118 |
| Median age (yr) | 61 |
| Gender | |
| Male | 71 (60.2) |
| Female | 47 (39.8) |
| Colorectal segment | |
| Cecum | 5 (4.2) |
| Ascending colon | 23 (19.5) |
| Transversal colon | 8 (6.8) |
| Descending colon | 5 (4.2) |
| Sigmoid | 25 (21.2) |
| Rectum | 52 (44.1) |
| UICC stage | |
| I | 18 (15.3) |
| II | 48 (40.7) |
| IIA | 32 (27.1) |
| IIB | 16 (13.6) |
| III | 37 (31.4) |
| IIIA | 5 (4.2) |
| IIIB | 25 (21.2) |
| IIIC | 7 (5.9) |
| IV | 15 (12.7) |
Table 2 Primers designed for amplification and pyrosequencing assay of K-ras and BRAF genes
| Primer sequence | Product (bp) | |
| K-ras gene codon 12 & 13 (exon 1) | Forward: 5'-GCAGTCAACTGGAATTTTCATG-3' | 431 |
| Reverse: 5'-biotin-GAAACCCAAGGTACATTTCAGA-3' | ||
| Pyrosequencing assay: 5'-TGTGGTAGTTGGAGCT- 3' | ||
| K-ras gene codon 61 (exon 2) | Forward:5'-ATCCAGACTGTGTTTCTCCCTTC-3' | 378 |
| Reverse: 5'-biotin-ACTGCTCTAATCCCCCAAGAACT-3' | ||
| Pyrosequencing assay: 5'-TATTCACGACACAGCAGGT-3' | ||
| BRAF gene codon 600 (exon 15) | Forward: 5'-ACAAGCCTTCAAAAATGAAGTAG-3' | 362 |
| Reverse: 5'-biotin-ATCCAGACAACTGTTCAAACTGA-3' | ||
| Pyrosequencing assay: 5'-GGTGATTTTGGTCTAACTACA-3' |
Table 3 Mutations of K-ras codons 12, 13, and 61 DNA detected by pyrosequencing assay
| Wild type (AA) | Point mutation (AA) | No. of mutations (%) | |
| K-ras codon 12 | GGT (Gly) | AGT (Ser) | 2 (1.7) |
| GGT (Gly) | GAT (Asp) | 16 (13.6) | |
| GGT (Gly) | GCT (Ala) | 2 (1.7) | |
| GGT (Gly) | GTT (Val) | 8 (6.8) | |
| K-ras codon 13 | GGC (Gly) | GAC (Asp) | 12 (10.2) |
| K-ras codon 61 | CAA (Gln) | CAT (His) | 1 (0.8) |
Table 4 Correlation between K-ras mutations and clinicopathological factors in colorectal cancer n (%)
| Terms | All | Wild type | Mutation type | P value |
| No. of patients | 118 | 77 (65.3) | 41 (34.7) | |
| Gender | 0.037 | |||
| Male | 71 | 51 (71.8) | 20 (28.2) | |
| Female | 47 | 26 (55.3) | 21 (44.7) | |
| Median age (yr) | 61.0 | 64.0 | 60.0 | 0.728 |
| Males | 65.0 | 65.0 | 65.5 | |
| Females | 60.0 | 60.5 | 58.0 | |
| Colorectal segment | 0.559 | |||
| Cecum | 5 | 1 (20.0) | 4 (80.0) | |
| Ascending colon | 23 | 17 (73.9) | 6 (26.1) | |
| Transversal colon | 8 | 4 (50.0) | 4 (50.0) | |
| Descending colon | 5 | 4 (80.0) | 1 (20.0) | |
| Sigmoid | 25 | 16 (64.0) | 9 (36.0) | |
| Rectum | 52 | 35 (67.3) | 17 (32.7) | |
| Differentiation | 0.761 | |||
| Poor | 17 | 12 (70.6) | 5 (29.4) | |
| Moderate | 42 | 25 (59.5) | 17 (40.5) | |
| Well | 59 | 40 (67.8) | 19 (32.2) | |
| UICC classification | 0.631 | |||
| I | 18 | 9 (50.0) | 9 (50.0) | |
| II | 48 | 37 (77.1) | 11 (22.9) | |
| III | 37 | 23 (62.2) | 14 (37.8) | |
| IV | 15 | 8 (53.3) | 7 (46.7) | |
| Bowel wall invasion (pT) | 0.120 | |||
| pT1 | 2 | 1 (50.0) | 1 (50.0) | |
| pT2 | 21 | 11 (52.4) | 10 (47.6) | |
| pT3 | 65 | 43 (66.2) | 22 (33.8) | |
| pT4 | 30 | 22 (73.3) | 8 (26.7) | |
| Lymph node metastasis (pN) | 0.585 | |||
| pN0 | 69 | 47 (68.1) | 22 (31.9) | |
| pN1-2 | 49 | 31 (63.3) | 18 (36.7) | |
| Distant metastasis (pM) | 0.301 | |||
| pM0 | 103 | 70 (68.0) | 33 (32.0) | |
| pM1 | 15 | 8 (53.3) | 7 (46.7) | |
Table 5 Relationship in K-ras mutation between gender and tumor location
| No. of K-ras mutated patients (%) | Total No. of patients | ||
| Colon | Rectum | ||
| Male | 12 (16.9) | 8 (11.2) | 71 |
| Female | 5 (10.6) | 16 (34) | 47 |
- Citation: Shen H, Yuan Y, Hu HG, Zhong X, Ye XX, Li MD, Fang WJ, Zheng S. Clinical significance of K-ras and BRAF mutations in Chinese colorectal cancer patients. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(6): 809-816
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i6/809.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i6.809
