Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2011; 17(5): 671-676
Published online Feb 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i5.671
Published online Feb 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i5.671
Table 1 Principles of fast track rehabilitation program and conventional care
| Fast track rehabilitation program | Conventional care | |
| Preoperative | Patients and their relatives | Patient were educated in the standard manner |
| were informed about the surgical procedure and postoperative course | ||
| Day before surgery | ||
| Bowel preparation | No bowel preparation was performed | Two oral sachets of fleet® bowel preparation |
| Carbohydrate load | 4 units (preOp®) | No |
| Diet | Last meal 6 h before operation | Last meal at midnight |
| Day of surgery | ||
| Pre-operative fasting | No, 2 units (preOp®) 2 h before surgery | Yes |
| Nasogastric tubes | No unless nausea and vomit | Routine placement |
| Pre-anesthetic medication | No | Oral diazepam 10 mg |
| Anesthesia | General anesthesia | General anesthesia |
| Remifentanil 1 μg/kg per minute | Remifentanil 1 μg/kg per minute | |
| Propofol 2-4 mg/kg per hour | Propofol 2-4 mg/kg per hour | |
| Cisatracium 0.15 mg/kg | Cisatracium 0.15 mg/kg | |
| Ondansetron 4 mg | Ondansetron 4 mg | |
| Bupivacaine 0.25% 20 mL (incision) | ||
| Epidural catheter | ||
| T10-T12 | ||
| Test: 3 mL 2% lidocaine with epinephrine | ||
| Bupivacaine 0.5% (6 + 6) mL | ||
| Surgical management | Minimal invasive incision | Median laparotomy approach |
| Infiltration of surgical wounds with Bupivacaine | No infiltration of surgical wounds with local anesthetic drugs | |
| Surgical drains | No, unless required in circumstances and discarded in early time (usually on postoperative day 1) | Routine placement usually discarded the day before discharge |
| Early post-operative care | Use of epidural catheter (0.125% Bupivacaine with 2.5 μg/mL Fentanyl) | Analgesia by bolus administration of diclofenac or morphine |
| First oral drink 2 h after surgery | No oral application scheme | |
| IV infusion of Ringers lactate 1.5 L/d | IV infusion of Ringers lactate 2.5 L/d | |
| Mobilization in the evening (> 2 h out of bed) | No mobilization scheme | |
| Postoperative care | ||
| Day 1 after surgery | Oral intake > 2 L (including 4 units CHL liquids) | Diet increased on daily basis |
| Semi-solid food intake | IV fluid administration (2.5 L/d) till adequate oral fluid intake | |
| Stop IV fluid administration | Mobilization according to attending surgeon | |
| Remove urine catheter | ||
| Expand mobilization (> 6 h out of bed) | ||
| Day 2 after surgery | Remove epidural add Diclofenac 3 × 50 mg/d | Continue as on day 1 till discharge criteria fulfilled |
| Normal diet | ||
| Expand mobilization (> 8 h) | ||
| Plan discharge | ||
| Day 3 after surgery | Continue as on day 2 till discharge criteria fulfilled | Continue as on day 2 till discharge criteria fulfilled |
Table 2 Characteristics of patients and their diagnosis
| Fast track rehabilitation group (n = 106) | Conventional care group (n = 104) | P value | |
| Median age (range, yr) | 57 (38-69) | 55 (40-67) | 0.462 |
| Male/female | 65/41 | 60/44 | 0.393 |
| Colon/rectum | 73/33 | 63/41 | 0.110 |
| ASA score | 0.384 | ||
| I | 27 | 32 | - |
| II | 60 | 56 | - |
| III | 19 | 16 | - |
| Operation | 0.721 | ||
| Right hemicolectomy | 30 | 24 | |
| Left hemicolectomy | 18 | 26 | |
| Sigmoid colectomy | 28 | 32 | |
| Anterior resection | 30 | 22 | |
| TNM stage | 0.741 | ||
| I | 19 | 17 | |
| II | 56 | 61 | |
| III | 31 | 26 |
Table 3 Postoperative rehabilitation and hospital stay time of two groups n (%)
| Fast track rehabilitation group (n = 106) | Conventional care group (n = 104) | P value | |
| Walk on surgery day | 11 (35) | 0 (0) | 0.001 |
| Walk on D 1 | 56 (53) | 24 (23) | 0.000 |
| Walk on D 2 | 90 (85) | 61 (59) | 0.001 |
| Days until flatus | 0.001 | ||
| mean ± SD | 2.1 ± 2.0 | 3.2 ± 2.5 | - |
| Median (range) | 2 (1-6) | 3 (1-8) | - |
| Hospital stay time (d) | 0.001 | ||
| mean ± SD | 5.1 ± 3.1 | 7.6 ± 4.8 | - |
| Median (range) | 5 (2-41) | 7 (3-55) | - |
Table 4 General and surgical complications of two groups
| Fast track rehabilitation group (n = 106) | Conventional care group (n = 104) | P value | |
| Overall complications | 20 | 39 | 0.015 |
| Patients with complications | 14 | 28 | 0.016 |
| General complications | 10 | 23 | 0.042 |
| Patients with general complications | 7 | 16 | 0.048 |
| Cardiac | 2 | 5 | - |
| Pulmonary | 3 | 8 | - |
| Thromboembolic | 1 | 3 | - |
| Urinary tract | 2 | 5 | - |
| Other | 2 | 2 | - |
| Overall surgical complications | 10 | 16 | 0.221 |
| Patients with surgical complications | 7 | 12 | 0.230 |
| Wound infection | 4 | 7 | - |
| Anastomotic leakage | 4 | 2 | - |
| Bowel obstruction | 2 | 5 | - |
| Death | 2 | 1 | 0.572 |
- Citation: Wang G, Jiang ZW, Xu J, Gong JF, Bao Y, Xie LF, Li JS. Fast-track rehabilitation program vs conventional care after colorectal resection: A randomized clinical trial. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(5): 671-676
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i5/671.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i5.671
