Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2011; 17(47): 5177-5183
Published online Dec 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i47.5177
Published online Dec 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i47.5177
Table 1 The baseline characteristics and endoscopic features of referred adenomas n (%)
No. of cases | 554 |
No. of patients | 534 |
Age (yr), mean ± SD | 62.1 ± 9.6 |
Male:female | 372:182 (2.04:1) |
Histologic grade | |
Adenoma (no grading) | 92 (16.6) |
Low grade | 382 (69.0) |
High grade | 80 (14.4) |
No. of referring hospitals | 116 |
No. of Bx, mean ± SD | 2.24 ± 1.75 |
Mean duration between biopsy and procedure | 40.7 d |
Information of endoscopic photo | 449 (81.0) |
Size (cm), mean ± SD | 1.2 ± 0.8 |
Morphologic type | |
Elevated | 275 (49.6) |
Flat | 206 (37.2) |
Depressed | 67 (12.1) |
Y-IV | 6 (1.1) |
Color | |
Whitish | 332 (59.9) |
Reddish | 94 (17.0) |
Mixed or undetermined | 128 (23.1) |
Longitudinal location | |
Antrum | 298 (53.8) |
Angle | 57 (10.3) |
Body | 191 (34.4) |
High | 12 (2.2) |
Middle | 55 (9.9) |
Lower | 124 (22.4) |
Cardia or fundus | 8 (1.5) |
Circular location | |
Anterior | 123 (22.2) |
Posterior | 119 (21.5) |
Lesser curvature | 193 (34.8) |
Greater curvature | 113 (20.4) |
Table 2 Treatment results of referred adenomas n (%)
Repeat endoscopy | 142 (25.6) |
Repeat biopsy | 108 (19.5) |
No. of biopsy, mean ± SD | 2.4 ± 1.0 |
Histologic results of repeat biopsy | |
Low grade adenoma | 73 (67.6) |
High grade adenoma | 9 (8.3) |
Adenocarcinoma | 18 (16.7) |
Gastritis | 7 (6.5) |
Others | 1 (0.9) (MALToma) |
Endoscopist | |
1 | 462 (83.4) |
2 | 64 (11.6) |
3 | 28 (5.1) |
Pathologist | |
1 | 340 (61.4) |
2 | 124 (22.4) |
3 | 83 (15.0) |
Others | 8 (1.1) |
Histologic type; tubulovillous adenoma | 10 (1.8) |
Type of procedure | |
EMR | 387 (69.9) |
ESD | 167 (30.1) |
Histologic results of post-procedure | |
Low grade adenoma | 356 (64.3) |
High grade adenoma | 68 (12.3) |
EGC | 72 (13.0) |
No adenomatous lesion | 56 (10.1) |
Others | 2 (0.4) (MALToma: 1, transfer by Cx: 1) |
Complication | |
Bleeding | 14 (2.5) |
Perforation | 2 (0.4) |
Stricture | 2 (0.4) |
Cases with multiple adenoma | |
2 adenoma in a patient | 12 patients/534 (2.2) |
3 adenoma in a patient | 4 patients/534 (0.7) |
Table 3 Comparisons of histologic diagnoses n (%)
LG | HG | EGC | NAL | Others | Total | Agreement | Discrepancy | |
Between local clinic biopsy and repeat biopsy | ||||||||
Adenoma | 11 (68.8) | 3 (18.8) | 0 (0) | 1 (6.3) | 1 (6.3) | 16 (100) | ||
LG | 51 (83.6) | 4 (6.6) | 2 (3.3) | 4 (6.6) | 0 (0) | 61 (100) | 51 (83.6) | 10 (16.4) |
HG | 11 (35.5) | 2 (6.5) | 16 (51.6) | 2 (6.5) | 0 (0) | 31 (100) | 2 (6.5) | 29 (93.5) |
Total | 73 (67.6) | 9 (8.3) | 18 (16.7) | 7 (6.5) | 1 (0.9) | 108 (100) | 53 (57.6) | 39 (42.4) |
Between local clinic and post procedure | ||||||||
Adenoma | 60 (65.2) | 14 (15.2) | 6 (6.5) | 11 (12.0) | 1 (1.1) | 92 (100) | ||
LG | 274 (71.7) | 42 (11.0) | 22 (5.8) | 43 (11.3) | 1 (0.3) | 382 (100) | 274 (71.7) | 108 (28.3) |
HG | 22 (27.5) | 12 (15.0) | 44 (55.0) | 2 (2.5) | 0 (0) | 80 (100) | 12 (15.0) | 68 (85.0) |
Total | 356 (64.3) | 68 (12.3) | 72 (13.0) | 56 (10.1) | 2 (0.4) | 554 (100) | 286 (61.9) | 176 (38.1) |
Between repeat forcep biopsy and post procedure | ||||||||
LG | 52 (71.2) | 1 (15.1) | 6 (8.2) | 3 (4.1) | 1 (1.4) | 73 (100) | 52 (71.2) | 21 (28.8) |
HG | 3 (33.3) | 4 (44.4) | 2 (22.2) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 9 (100) | 4 (44.4) | 5 (45.6) |
Adenocarcinoma | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 17 (94.4) | 1 (5.6) | 0 (0) | 18 (100) | 17 (94.4) | 1 (5.6) |
Benign lesion | 3 (42.9) | 0 (0) | 2 (28.6) | 2 (28.6) | 0 (0) | 7 (100) | 2 (28.6) | 5 (71.4) |
Others | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (100) | 1 (100) | 1 (100) | 0 (0) |
Total | 58 (53.7) | 15 (13.9) | 27 (25.0) | 6 (5.6) | 2 (1.9) | 108 (100) | 76 (70.4) | 32 (29.6) |
Table 4 Results of re-endoscopic forceps biopsy according to endoscopists and pathologists n (%)
LG | HG | Ade | NAL | Others | Total | |
Endoscopist | ||||||
1 | 34 (54.0) | 6 (9.5) | 18 (28.6) | 4 (6.3) | 1 (1.6) | 63 |
2 | 36 (92.3) | 3 (7.7) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39 |
3 | 3 (50.0) | 0 | 0 | 3 (50.0) | 0 | 6 |
Pathologist | ||||||
1 | 40 (64.5) | 4 (6.5) | 15 (24.2) | 2 (3.2) | 1 (1.6) | 62 |
2 | 20 (66.7) | 4 (13.3) | 2 (6.7) | 4 (13.3) | 0 | 30 |
3 | 8 (80.0) | 1 (10.0) | 1 (10.0) | 0 | 0 | 10 |
Others | 5 (83.3) | 0 | 0 | 1 (16.7) | 0 | 6 |
Deletion of minority | ||||||
Adenocarcinoma | Non-adenocarcinoma | P value | ||||
Endoscopist | ||||||
1 | 18 (28.6) | 45 (71.4) | < 0.001 | |||
2 | 0 (0) | 39 (100) | ||||
Pathologist | ||||||
1 | 15 (24.2) | 47 (77.8) | 0.048 | |||
2 | 2 (6.7) | 15 (93.3) |
Table 5 Comparison of the non-malignancy group and the malignancy group n (%)
Non-malignancy group | Malignancy group | P value | |
No. of cases | 482 (87.0) | 72 (13.0) | |
No. of patients | 462 (86.5) | 72 (13.5) | |
Age (yr), mean ± SD | 61.8 ± 9.8 | 63.7 ± 9.0 | 0.132 |
Sex | |||
Male | 320 (86.0) | 52 (14.0) | 0.350 |
Female | 162 (89.0) | 20 (11.0) | |
Histologic grade | |||
Adenoma | 86 (93.5) | 6 (6.5) | < 0.001 |
Low grade | 360 (94.2) | 22 (5.8) | |
High grade | 36 (45.0) | 44 (55.0) | |
Histologic type | |||
Tubulovillous | 7 (70) | 3 (30) | 0.129 |
Tubular | 475 (83.3) | 69 (12.7) | |
No. of Bx, mean ± SD | 2.1 ± 1.6 | 2.9 ± 2.2 | < 0.001 |
No. of biopsy | |||
Undetermined | 111 (86.0) | 18 (14.0) | |
1 | 47 (92.2) | 4 (7.8) | |
2 | 117 (94.4) | 7 (5.6) | |
3 | 105 (92.1) | 9 (7.9) | |
4 | 47 (72.3) | 18 (27.7) | |
5 | 25 (80.6) | 6 (19.4) | |
6 | 12 (70.6) | 5 (29.4) | |
7 | 1 (33.3) | 2 (66.7) | |
8 | 1 (33.3) | 2 (66.7) | |
3 | 269 (93.1) | 20 (6.9 | < 0.001 |
4 | 86 (72.3) | 33 (27.7) | |
Mean duration between Bx and procedure (d) | 40.9 | 39.3 | 0.869 |
Duration between biopsy and procedure | |||
14 d | 24 (92.3) | 2 (7.7) | 0.658 |
90 d | 29 (87.9) | 4 (12.1) | |
Size (cm), mean ± SD | 1.2 ± 0.8 | 1.5 ± 1.1 | 0.003 |
< 1.0 | 201 (89.7) | 23 (10.3) | 0.010 |
> 1.0, < 2.0 | 218 (87.9) | 30 (12.1) | |
> 2.0 | 63 (76.8) | 19 (23.2) | |
Morphologic type | |||
Elevated | 252 (91.6) | 23 (8.4) | < 0.001 |
Flat | 187 (90.8) | 19 (9.2) | |
Depressed | 43 (64.2) | 24 (35.8) | |
Y-IV | 0 (0) | 6 (100) | |
Color | |||
Whitish | 321 (96.7) | 11 (3.3) | < 0.001 |
Reddish | 65 (69.1) | 29 (30.9) | |
Mixed or undetermined | 96 (75.0) | 32 (25.0) | |
Longitudinal location | |||
Antrum | 255 (85.6) | 43 (14.4) | 0.291 |
Angle | 47 (82.5) | 10 (17.5) | |
Body | 173 (90.6) | 18 (9.4) | |
Cardia or fundus | 7 (87.5) | 1 (12.5) | |
Circular location | |||
Anterior | 104 (84.6) | 19 (15.4) | 0.573 |
Posterior | 107 (89.9) | 12 (10.1) | |
Lesser curvature | 171 (88.6) | 22 (11.4) | |
Greater curvature | 95 (84.1) | 18 (15.9) | |
Type of procedure | |||
EMR | 371 (95.9) | 16 (4.1) | < 0.001 |
ESD | 111 (66.5) | 56 (33.5) | |
Repeat endoscopy | |||
Yes | 110 (77.5) | 32 (22.5) | < 0.001 |
No | 372 (90.3) | 40 (9.7) | |
Endoscopist | |||
1 | 397 (85.6) | 65 (14.1) | 0.204 |
2 | 60 (93.8) | 4 (6.3) | |
3 | 25 (89.3) | 3 (10.7) | |
Pathologist | |||
1 | 284 (83.5) | 56 (16.5) | 0.027 |
2 | 117 (94.4) | 7 (5.6) | |
3 | 74 (89.2) | 9 (10.8) | |
Others | 6 (100) | 0 (0) | |
Local clinics (> 30 cases) | |||
1 | 39 (95.1) | 2 (4.9) | 0.224 |
2 | 37 (90.2) | 4 (9.8) | |
3 | 35 (97.2) | 1 (2.8) | |
4 | 28 (84.8) | 5 (15.2) | |
Complication | |||
Bleeding | 9 (64.3) | 5 (35.7) | |
Perforation | 1 (50) | 1 (50) | |
Stricture | 1 (50) | 1 (50) | |
Total complications | 11 (61.1) | 7 (38.9) | 0.005 |
No complications | 471 (87.9) | 65 (12.1) | |
Multiplicity | |||
Patient of single case | 449 (86.7) | 69 (13.3) | 0.464 |
Patient of multiple cases | 13 (81.3) | 3 (18.8) |
Table 6 Odds ratio of risk factors for malignancy as a final diagnosis
Odds ratio | |
High grade dysplasia | 19.5 |
Biopsy number ≥ 4 | 5.1 |
Size ≥ 2.0 cm | 2.4 |
Depressed or Y-III, Y-IV | 7.3 |
Reddish or undetermined | 11.1 |
ESD | 11.7 |
Repeat endoscopy | 2.7 |
Pathologist 1 | 2.4 |
Complications | 4.6 |
- Citation: Nam KW, Song KS, Lee HY, Lee BS, Seong JK, Kim SH, Moon HS, Lee ES, Jeong HY. Spectrum of final pathological diagnosis of gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(47): 5177-5183
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i47/5177.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i47.5177