Editorial
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2011; 17(39): 4365-4371
Published online Oct 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i39.4365
Table 1 Details of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in 1006 patients treated at Asian Institute of Gastroenterology
No. of sessionsn (%)Shock waves (n)
MeanRange
1292 (29)4450(4250-4900)
2370 (37)9270(8800-9940)
3300 (30)13 250(11 800-14 700)
432 (3)18 900(18 100-19 400)
≥ 512 (1)23 550(22 100-27 750)
Clearance
Complete cleared762 (76)
Partially cleared173 (17)
Failed clearance71 (7)
Table 2 Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for pancreatic calculi
AuthorNo. of patientsComplete clearance (%)Pain relief (%)Follow-up (mo)
Delhaye et al[10]123598514
Costamagna et al[12]35747227
Kozarek et al[14]40-8030
Farnbacher et al[27]125644829
Dumona ceau et al[20]29-5551
Adamek et al[16]80-7640
Tandan et al[7]100676846
Table 3 Pain relief and analgesic use, pre- and post-extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy[7]
Post-ESWLPre-ESWL
(n = 846)(n = 711)
Pain relief VAS (Scale 0-10)0326P < 0.001
6/102121/10161
7/103202/1096
8/102043/1085
9/101104/1043
Analgesic use Doses/mo0-0326P < 0.001
1-5481-5258
6-101906-10127
11-15385
> 15223
Table 4 Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for large common bile duct calculi
AuthorNo. of patientsComplete clearance (%)
Adamek et al[27]7978.5
Neuhas et al[29]3073
Binmoeller et al[28]1070
Ellis et al[5]8383
Tandan et al[3]28384
Kocdor et al[32]2085