Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2011; 17(37): 4199-4205
Published online Oct 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i37.4199
Published online Oct 7, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i37.4199
Table 1 Clinical presentations of the two study groups n (%)
| STARR n = 30 (F28) | Macrogol n = 30 (F30) | P value | |
| Mean age (yr) | 51 ± 9 | 53 ± 13 | |
| Duration of | 24 (80) | 26 (87) | 0.7 |
| constipation > 10 yr | |||
| Straining | 28 (93) | 29 (97) | 1 |
| Hard stools | 27 (90) | 29 (97) | 0.6 |
| Incomplete evacuation | 27 (90) | 27 (90) | 0.7 |
| Anal blockage | 27 (90) | 27 (90) | 0.7 |
| Digital facilitation | 11 (37) | 8 (27) | 0.6 |
| < 3 BM/wk | 23 (77) | 26 (87) | 0.5 |
| Laxatives | 27 (90) | 30 (100) | 0.2 |
| Rectal bleeding | 13 (43) | 7 (23) | 0.2 |
| Rectocele > 3 cm | 23 (77) | 15 (50) | 0.06 |
| Rectal intussusception | 15 (50) | 20 (67) | 0.3 |
Table 2 Presenting symptoms in responders and non-responders to stapled trans-anal rectal resection n (%)
| Responders | Non-responders | P value | |
| Straining | 16 (100) | 12 (86) | 0.4 |
| Hard stools | 14 (87) | 13 (93) | 0.9 |
| Incomplete evacuation | 16 (100) | 11(78) | 0.2 |
| Anal blockage | 15 (94) | 12 (86) | 0.9 |
| Digital facilitation | 4 (25) | 7 (50) | 0.3 |
| < 3 BM/wk | 13 (81) | 10 (71) | 0.8 |
| Laxatives | 14 (87) | 13 (93) | 0.9 |
Table 3 Number of responders, degree of satisfaction, and Wexner constipation score variation during macrogol and after stapled trans-anal rectal resection treatment n (%)
| Macrogol | STARR | P value | |
| Responders | 22 (73) | 16 (53) | 0.2 |
| Satisfaction | 0.4 | ||
| Total | 18 (60) | 16 (53) | |
| Partial | 5 (17) | 9 (30) | |
| Not satisfied | 7 (23) | 5 (17) | |
| Δ Wexner score, mean ± SD | 8 ± 5 | 6 ± 5.2 | 0.1 |
Table 4 Defecographic findings in responders and non-responders submitted to stapled trans-anal rectal resection (mean ± SD)
| Variables | Before | After | ||
| Non-responders | Responders | Non-responders | Responders | |
| Rectal diameter (cm) | 7.7 ± 1.4 | 7.3 ± 1 | 5.5 ± 0.9 | 5.8 ± 1.5 |
| ∆ ARA evacuation (°) | 16 ± 8 | 25 ± 18 | 8.1 ± 20.3 | 28 ± 16.2a |
| PF at rest (cm) | 5.1 ± 1.5 | 4.8 ± 1.3 | 4.3 ± 1.5 | 4.6 ± 1 |
| PF during sqeezing (cm) | 1.4 ± 0.7 | 1.3 ± 0.9 | 1.8 ± 0.9 | 1.2 ± 0.8 |
| ∆ PF evacuation (cm) | 3.1 ± 1.6 | 3 ± 1.3 | 3.6 ± 1.1 | 3.1 ± 1.5 |
| Rectocele (cm) | 3.8 ± 1.8 | 4.1 ± 0.6 | 1.1 ± 1.6 | 1.7 ± 1.5 |
| Anal diameter (cm) | 1.4 ± 0.6 | 1.4 ± 0.8 | 1.3 ± 0.8 | 1.1 ± 0.4 |
- Citation: Biviano I, Badiali D, Candeloro L, Habib FI, Mongardini M, Caviglia A, Anzini F, Corazziari ES. Comparative outcome of stapled trans-anal rectal resection and macrogol in the treatment of defecation disorders. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(37): 4199-4205
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i37/4199.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i37.4199
