Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 21, 2011; 17(31): 3596-3604
Published online Aug 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i31.3596
Published online Aug 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i31.3596
Table 1 Clinical data of study patients
Case | Sex | Age at onset(yr) | Age at diagnosis(yr) | Past history | Main symptoms | Physicalexamination | HGB(g/dL ) | WBC count(×109/L ) | |
GI bleeding | Abdominal pain | ||||||||
1 | F | 30 | 33 | Gallbladder stone | P | P | Normal | 9.0 | 3.2 |
2 | F | 48 | 64 | No | P | Normal | 5.8-9.6 | 4.1 | |
3 | M | 24 | 26 | Appendectomy | N | Normal | 10.9 | 5.3 | |
4 | F | 40 | 44 | Hysteromyoma | P | P | Normal | 9.2 | 5.7 |
5 | M | 32 | 41 | No | P | N | Normal | 9.7 | 5.0 |
Table 2 Data of enteroscopic findings
Case | n | Location (distance to ileocecal valve)(cm) | Type of lesion | Stricture | Edema in mucosa | Pass-through of scope | |
Mild to moderate | Severe | ||||||
1 | 1 | 80 | Ulcer | 1 | 0 | P | P |
2 | 3 | 100-115 | Ulcer and erosion | 1 | 2 | P | P |
3 | 1 | 100 | Ulcer | 1 | 0 | P | P |
4 | 1 | 80 | Ulcer | 1 | 0 | P | P |
5 | 1 | 150 | Erosion | 0 | 1 | P | P |
Table 3 Data of computed tomography findings
Case | Location | n | Stenosis | Lumen expansion | Bowel wall | Mesentericvessels | Lymph nodeenlargement | ||
Thickness (mm) | Attenuation | Enhancement | |||||||
1 | Ileum | 1 | P | P | 2.5 | Isodense | Moderate | Normal | N |
2 | Ileum | 2 | P | P | 7 | Isodense | Moderate | Normal | N |
3 | Ileum | 1 | N | P | 3 | Isodense | Moderate | Normal | P |
4 | Ileum | 1 | P | P | 2.5 | Isodense | Moderate | Normal | N |
5 | Ileum | 1 | P | P | 5 | Isodense | Moderate | Normal | N |
Table 4 Data of histologic findings
Case | Size1 (cm) | Type | Depth1 | Inflammatoryinfiltrate | Fibrosis | Mucosalatrophy | Thickening ofmuscularis mucosa | Edema insubmucosa |
1 | 2.0 × 0.5 | Ulcer | Muscular layer | Moderate | Mild | N | Mild | N |
22 | 2.0 × 0.2 | Ulcer | Muscular layer | Severe | Mild | N | Moderate | N |
3 | 3.0 × 0.2 | Ulcer | Submucosa | Severe | Moderate | N | N | P |
4 | 3.0 × 0.5 | Ulcer | Submucosa | Severe | Moderate | N | Moderate | P |
5 | 2.0 × 0.5 | Erosion | Mucosa | Moderate | None | N | N | N |
Table 5 Differences between diaphragm disease of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-enteropathy and diaphragm-like strictures in study group
History | Location | n | Fibrosis | Lesions in other area ofbowel | Disease process | |
Diaphragm disease | Long term NSAID use | Whole GI tract, most frequently in ileum | Multiple | Obvious | Exist, can be inflammation, erosion, fibrosis, stricture and perforation | Improvement in clinical findings by cessation of NSAID utilization |
Diaphragm-like strictures | No NSAID use | Middle or distal segment of ileum | Usually single, no more than three | Mild or moderate | No | Non-self-limiting |
- Citation: Wang ML, Miao F, Tang YH, Zhao XS, Zhong J, Yuan F. Special diaphragm-like strictures of small bowel unrelated to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(31): 3596-3604
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i31/3596.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i31.3596