Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2011; 17(26): 3145-3150
Published online Jul 14, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i26.3145
Published online Jul 14, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i26.3145
Table 1 Baseline data of the patients
| Variables | Values |
| Mean age (yr) | 57.2 |
| Cases of HBV-related liver disease | 61.0 |
| Cases of HCV-related liver disease | 0.0 |
| Mean AST (U/L) | 43.4 |
| Mean ALT (U/L) | 49.5 |
| Mean total bilirubin (μmol/L) | 26.2 |
| Mean AFP (ng/mL) | 963.9 |
| Mean tumor size (cm) | 8.3 |
Table 2 Variables and classes by univariate and multivariate analyses
| Variables | Classes | |||
| A | B | C | D | |
| Sex | M (52) | F (11) | ||
| Age (yr) | < 55 (36) | > 55 (27) | ||
| No. of lesions | Solitary (43) | Multiple (20) | ||
| Tumor size (cm) | 5-10 (41) | > 10 (22) | ||
| Tumor extension | 1 lobe (46) | 2 lobe (17) | ||
| Tumor margin | Clear (28) | Not clear (35) | ||
| AFP | < 400 (22) | > 400 (41) | ||
| Portal thrombosis | Absent (51) | Present (12) | ||
| Ascites | Absent (56) | Present (7) | ||
| Child grade | A (38) | B (25) | ||
| Okuda stage | I (29) | II (34) | ||
| TACE (number of times) | 1 (11) | 2 (26) | 3 (20) | 4 (6) |
| PEA (number of times) | 1 (3) | 2 (6) | 3 (31) | > 4 (23) |
| Total ethanol dose | 10-30 (2) | - 60 (9) | - 90 (29) | > 90 (23) |
Table 3 Factors affecting survival by univariate analysis n (%)
| Variables | Class | Survival | P value | ||
| 1 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | |||
| Sex | A | 27 (51.9) | 16 (30.8) | 9 (17.3) | |
| B | 7 (63.6) | 4 (36.4) | 2 (18.2) | 0.9241 | |
| Age (yr) | A | 21 (58.3) | 11 (30.6) | 5 (13.9) | |
| B | 13 (48.1) | 9 (33.3) | 6 (22.2) | 0.2231 | |
| No. of lesions | A | 25 (58.1) | 17 (39.5) | 10 (23.3) | |
| B | 9 (45.0) | 3 (15.0) | 1 (5.0) | 0.01451 | |
| Tumor size | A | 28 (68.3) | 18 (43.9) | 11 (26.8) | |
| B | 6 (27.3) | 2 (9.1) | 0 (0) | 0.00411 | |
| Tumor extension | A | 29 (63.0) | 18 (39.1) | 11 (23.9) | |
| B | 5 (29.4) | 2 (11.8) | 0 (0) | 0.00541 | |
| Tumor margin | A | 25 (89.3) | 15 (53.6) | 11 (39.3) | |
| B | 9 (25.7) | 5 (14.3) | 0 (0) | 0.00521 | |
| AFP | A | 16 (72.7) | 10 (45.5) | 9 (40.9) | |
| B | 18 (43.9) | 10 (24.4) | 2 (4.9) | 0.00301 | |
| Portal thrombosis | A | 31 (60.8) | 18 (35.3) | 11 (21.6) | |
| B | 3 (25.0) | 2 (16.7) | 0 (0) | 0.01111 | |
| Ascites | A | 32 (57.1) | 19 (33.9) | 11 (19.6) | |
| B | 2 (28.6) | 1 (14.3) | 0 (0) | 0.01151 | |
| Child grade | A | 28 (73.7) | 17 (44.7) | 11 (28.9) | |
| B | 6 (24.0) | 3 (12.0) | 0 (0) | 0.01321 | |
| Okuda stage | A | 22 (75.9) | 14 (48.3) | 10 (34.5) | |
| B | 12 (35.3) | 6 (17.6) | 1 (2.9) | 0.01501 | |
| TACE (No. of times) | A | 3 (27.2) | 2 (18.2) | 1 (9.1) | |
| B | 13 (50.0) | 7 (26.9) | 3 (11.5) | ||
| C | 13 (65.0) | 8 (40.0) | 5 (25.0) | ||
| D | 5 (83.3) | 3 (50.0) | 2 (33.3) | 0.17192 | |
| PEA (No. of times) | A | 1 (33.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| B | 2 (33.3) | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0) | ||
| C | 16 (48.5) | 10 (32.3) | 5 (16.1) | ||
| D | 15 (65.2) | 9 (39.1) | 6 (26.1) | < 0.00012 | |
| Total ethanol dose | A | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
| B | 2 (33.3) | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0) | ||
| C | 15 (51.7) | 9 (31.0) | 5 (16.1) | ||
| D | 17 (73.9) | 10 (43.5) | 6 (26.1) | < 0.00012 | |
Table 4 Significant factors predicting survival found using Cox proportional hazards model
| Variables | Hazard ratio | P value |
| No. of lesions | ||
| Multiple vs single solitary lesions | 2.626 | 0.001 |
| Tumor margin | ||
| Not clear vs clear | 2.439 | 0.000 |
| Total ethanol dose | ||
| 30-60 mL vs 10-30 mL | 0.386 | 0.000 |
| 60-90 mL vs 10-30 mL | 0.202 | 0.000 |
| > 90 mL vs 10-30 mL | 0.116 | 0.000 |
- Citation: Gao F, Gu YK, Fan WJ, Zhang L, Huang JH. Evaluation of transarterial chemoembolization combined with percutaneous ethanol ablation for large hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(26): 3145-3150
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v17/i26/3145.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i26.3145
