Brief Article
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2011; 17(15): 2028-2036
Published online Apr 21, 2011. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i15.2028
Table 1 Clinicopathologic data of patients
Termsn (%)
Sex
Male85 (54.5)
Female71 (45.5)
Location
Right hemicolon45 (30.1)
Transverse colon3 (1.9)
Left hemicolon8 (5.8)
Sigmoid colon32 (20.5)
Rectum67 (41.7)
Differentiation
Well95 (60.9)
Moderately40 (25.6)
Poorly17 (10.9)
Unknown4 (2.6)
Bowel wall invasion (pT)
T17 (4.5)
T230 (19.2)
T3116 (74.4)
T43 (1.9)
Lymph node metastasis (pN)
N082 (52.6)
N143 (27.5)
N231 (19.9)
Distant metastasis (pM)
M0144 (92.3)
M112 (7.7)
TNM staging
I29 (18.6)
II52 (33.3)
III63 (40.4)
IV12 (7.7)
Post-surgery event
Recurrence or metastasis51 (32.7)
Survival status
Dead51 (32.7)1
Alive105 (67.3)
Table 2 Expression of candidate markers in 156 colorectal cancer patients
MarkersNumbers of patients with different expression1
NegativeLowMediumHigh
P5342363240
APC80372110
MAPK1142780
E-cadherin44473622
Mmp91094061
Hsp279633186
MSH217524739
P21ras1024382
ADCY-24567363
Shp210834130
ETB5960305
Neuroligin5352434
Rho2868459
SPARCL123526120
Table 3 Relationship between marker expression and clinical features (P values)
MarkersP values
DifferentiationpTpNpMTNMPost-surgery
P530.6710.6540.003b0.1190.024a0.207
MAPK0.1860.5970.2300.1880.1820.001b
E-cadherin0.028a0.3420.0800.041a0.2230.004b
MSH20.9640.006b0.012a0.0610.001b0.001b
ADCY-20.4580.4300.7790.4700.8780.082
Shp20.020a0.004b0.035a0.8490.006b0.006b
SPARCL10.002b0.1710.037a0.021a0.044a0.014a