Liu P, Yang JM, Niu WY, Kan T, Xie F, Li DQ, Wang Y, Zhou YM. Prognostic factors in the surgical treatment of caudate lobe hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(9): 1123-1128 [PMID: 20205285 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i9.1123]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Jia-Mei Yang, MD, Chief, Department of Special Treatment and Liver Transplantation, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China. jmyang@smmu.edu.cn
Article-Type of This Article
Brief Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 7, 2010; 16(9): 1123-1128 Published online Mar 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i9.1123
Table 1 Clinical and pathologic characteristics of 114 HCC patients
Characteristics
n (%)
Age (yr)
≤ 65
89 (77)
> 65
25 (23)
Gender
Male
87 (76)
Female
27 (24)
Cirrhotic liver
No
36 (32)
Yes
78 (68)
Tumor size (cm)
≤ 5
50 (44)
> 5
64 (56)
Serum AFP (ng/mL)
≤ 200
69 (61)
> 200
45 (39)
Subsegmental location
Spiegel lobe
39 (34)
Paracaval portion
54 (47)
Caudate process
21 (19)
Tumor number
Solitary
91 (80)
Multiple
23 (20)
Pringle maneuver
No
34 (30)
Yes
80 (70)
Surgical treatment
Isolated caudate lobectomy
78 (68)
Extended hepatectomy
36 (32)
Surgical margin (mm)
≤ 5
47 (41)
> 5
67 (59)
Histologic grading
Differentiated
96 (84)
Undifferentiated
18 (16)
Capsule
No
95 (93)
Yes
19 (17)
Vascular invasion
No
71 (81)
Yes
43 (38)
Daughter nodules
No
83 (73)
Yes
31 (27)
Table 2 Hepatectomy for caudate lobe hepatocellular carcinoma
Operations
n (%)
Isolated caudate lobectomy
78 (68.4)
Spiegel lobe
27
Paracaval portion and caudate process
31
Spiegel and paracaval portion
2
Paracaval portion
7
Caudate process
4
Complete caudate lobectomy
7
Extended hepatectomy
36 (31.6)
Spiegel and left hemihepatectomy
5
Spiegel and segment IV
2
Spiegel and II, III
3
Spiegel and VI, VII
1
Spiegel and VII
1
Paracaval portion and caudate process and right hemihepatectomy
4
Paracaval portion and caudate process and segment IV
2
Paracaval portion and caudate process and VII
1
Paracaval portion and caudate process and segment II, III
3
Paracaval portion and caudate process and V, VI
2
Paracaval portion and segment II, III
3
Paracaval portion and segment VI, VII
1
Complete caudate lobe and right hemihepatectomy
1
Complete caudate lobe and segment IV
1
Complete caudate lobe and left hemihepatectomy
4
Complete caudate lobe and segment II, III
1
Complete caudate lobe and segment VI
1
Table 3 Overall survival: univariate analysis of prognostic clinicopathologic factors
3-yr survival (%)
5-yr survival (%)
P-value
Age (yr)
≤ 65
52.8
34.2
0.24
> 65
63.1
52.0
Gender
Male
56.1
38.4
0.41
Female
60.6
50.0
Cirrhosis
Yes
35.0
12.3
0.03
No
60.6
47.9
Serum AFP (ng/mL)
≤ 200
55.9
34.6
0.57
> 200
55.4
45.5
Tumor location
Spiegel lobe
63.1
45.7
0.01
Paracaval portion
22.9
16.2
Caudate process
25.2
14.9
Tumor size (cm)
≤ 5
58.4
43.3
0.48
> 5
57.0
39.4
Pringle maneuver
No
67.7
42.1
0.73
Yes
62.5
37.9
Surgical margin (mm)
≤ 5
20.4
18.5
0.02
> 5
60.7
54.6
Surgical treatment
Isolated caudate lobectomy
52.1
42.1
0.04
Extended hepatectomy
27.9
15.4
Histologic grading
Differentiated
57.7
33.6
0.79
Undifferentiated
52.2
29.4
Capsule
No
65.3
41.5
0.70
Yes
56.1
35.9
Vascular invasion
No
52.4
37.9
0.05
Yes
29.2
23.2
Daughter nodules
No
56.1
36.8
0.38
Yes
45.3
25.0
Table 4 Overall survival: multivariate analysis of prognostic clinicopathologic factors
Hazard ratio
95% CI
P-value
Location of tumor
0.176
0.046-0.701
0.02
Liver cirrhosis
4.874
1.107-19.339
0.04
Surgical margin
1.36
0.210-2.375
0.04
Table 5 Disease-free survival: univariate analysis of prognostic clinicopathologic factors
3-yr survival (%)
5-yr survival (%)
P-value
Age (yr)
≤ 62
46.7
21.7
0.76
> 62
38.2
31.4
Gender
Male
49.4
26.4
0.43
Female
25.1
20.7
Cirrhosis
Yes
42.6
37.2
0.19
No
51.9
29.3
Serum AFP (ng/mL)
≤ 200
36.5
20.1
0.66
> 200
32.4
29.7
Tumor location
Spiegel lobe
50.5
34.4
0.07
Paracaval portion
36.9
20.6
Caudate process
41.0
26.2
Tumor size (cm)
≤ 5
40.6
23.0
0.69
> 5
44.0
26.4
Pringle maneuver
No
40.4
22.6
0.66
Yes
36.1
19.8
Surgical margin
Positive
42.6
22.8
0.08
Negative
55.2
30.7
Surgical treatment
Isolated caudate lobectomy
43.4
24.0
0.35
Extended hepatectomy
41.7
35.8
Histologic grading
Differentiated
42.1
24.2
0.42
Undifferentiated
33.9
28.7
Capsule
No
36.3
19.0
0.65
Yes
43.8
26.3
Vascular invasion
No
45.0
29.7
0.25
Yes
34.0
21.3
Daughter nodules
No
56.1
36.8
0.09
Yes
45.3
25.0
Citation: Liu P, Yang JM, Niu WY, Kan T, Xie F, Li DQ, Wang Y, Zhou YM. Prognostic factors in the surgical treatment of caudate lobe hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(9): 1123-1128