Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 21, 2010; 16(7): 904-908
Published online Feb 21, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i7.904
Published online Feb 21, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i7.904
Variable | Patients (n) | RECK methylation | P value |
Age (yr) | 0.689 | ||
≤ 65 | 32 | 16 | |
> 65 | 8 | 3 | |
Tumor size (cm) | 0.121 | ||
≤ 5 | 24 | 9 | |
> 5 | 16 | 10 | |
Borrmann classification | 0.199 | ||
1+2 | 19 | 7 | |
3+4 | 21 | 12 | |
Tumor differentiation | 0.935 | ||
Well | 25 | 12 | |
Moderate/poor | 15 | 7 | |
Tumor invasion | 0.023 | ||
T1+T2 | 28 | 10 | |
T3+T4 | 12 | 9 | |
Nodal status | 0.199 | ||
N- | 19 | 7 | |
N+ | 21 | 12 |
PLM | Peritoneal metastasis | |
+ | - | |
+ | 6 | 8 |
- | 3 | 23 |
Variable | Patients (n) | RECK methylation in peritoneal lavage | P value |
Tumor invasion | 0.193 | ||
T1+T2 | 28 | 8 | |
T3+T4 | 12 | 6 | |
Nodal status | 0.273 | ||
N- | 19 | 5 | |
N+ | 21 | 9 |
-
Citation: Du YY, Dai DQ, Yang Z. Role of
RECK methylation in gastric cancer and its clinical significance. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(7): 904-908 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i7/904.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i7.904