Copyright
©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2010; 16(44): 5543-5554
Published online Nov 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i44.5543
Published online Nov 28, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i44.5543
Table 1 Lugano staging classification of gastrointestinal tract lymphoma[29]
Stage | |
I | Tumor confined to GI tract |
Stage primary site or multiple, noncontiguous lesions | |
II | Tumor extending into abdomen from primary GI site |
Nodal involvement | |
II1 | Local (paragastric in cases of gastric lymphoma and paraintestinal for intestinal lymphoma) |
II2 | Distant (mesenteric in the case of an intestinal primary; otherwise paraaortic, paracaval, pelvic, inguinal) |
IIE | Penetration of serosa to involve adjacent organs or tissues [enumerate actual site of involvement, e.g. IIE (pancreas), IIE (large intestine), IIE (post intestinal wall)] |
Where there is both nodal involvement and penetration involving adjacent organs, the stage is denoted using both a subscript (1 or 2) and E, e.g. II1E (pancreas) | |
IV | Disseminated extra-nodal involvement, or a GI tract lesion with supradiaphragmatic nodal involvement |
Table 2 Results of different randomized trials comparing chemotherapy with chemotherapy plus rituximab in previously untreated patients with follicular lymphoma
Study | No. of patients, pathological types, staging | Median age (yr) | Complete response rate | End point | ||||
Median progression-free survival | Event-free survival | Median response duration | Time to treatment failure | Overall survival | ||||
CVP[40] | n = 321, FL, Stage II-IV | 52 | P < 0.0001b | P < 0.0001b | P < 0.001b | P = 0.029a | ||
R-CVP | n = 162 | Unknown | 41% | 34 mo | Prolonged than CVP alone (lower relapse rate than CVP alone) | Prolonged than CVP alone | 83% (at 4 yr) | |
CVP | n = 159 | Unknown | 11% | 15 mo | 77% (at 4 yr) | |||
GLSG[38,39] | n = 428, FL, Stage III or IV(advanced stage) | 55 | P > 0.05 (not significant) | P = 0.001b | P < 0.001b | P = 0.016a | ||
R-CHOP | n = 223 | 54 | 20% | Not reached | Lower relapse rate than CHOP alone | 28/233 (12.0%) | 95% (at 2 yr) | |
CHOP | n = 205 | 57 | 17% | 31 mo | 61/205 (29.8%) | 90% (at 2 yr) | ||
FL2000[41] | n = 358, FL, 89% > stage II | 61 | P = 0.001b | P = 0.001b | P = 0.012a | P > 0.05 (not significant) | ||
R-CHVP/IFN | n = 175 | Unknown | 67% (at 18 mo) | Not reached | 53% (at 5 yr) | 64% (at 4 yr) | 84% (at 5 yr) | |
CHVP/IFN | n = 183 | Unknown | 50% (at 18 mo) | 35 mo | 37% (at 5 yr) | 44% (at 4 yr) | 79% (at 5 yr) | |
OSHO[42] | n = 201, FL, Stage II and IV | 59 | P = 0.0004b | P < 0.0001b | P < 0.0001b | P < 0.0001b | P = 0.0096b | |
R-MCP | n = 105 | 60 | 52/105 (50%) | Not reached | Not reached | Not reached | 87% (at 4 yr) | |
MCP | n = 96 | 57 | 25/96 (25%) | 28.8 mo | 26 mo | 35 mo | 74% (at 4 yr) |
Table 3 Results of different randomized trials comparing chemotherapy with chemotherapy plus rituximab in relapsed or refractory follicular lymphomas
Study | No. of patients, target disease | Median age (yr) | Complete response rate | End point | |
Median progression-free survival | Overall survival | ||||
GLSG[43] | n = 65, relapsed FL | P = 0.011a | P = 0.0139a | P = 0.0943 (not significant) | |
R-FCM | n = 35 | 60 | 94% | Near 36 mo | 90% (at 2 yr) |
FCM | n = 30 | 59.5 | 70% | 21 mo | 70% (at 2 yr) |
EORTC, HOVON, NCIC, CTG, BNLI, ALLG, NLG and EORTC Data Center-multicenter study[44] | n = 465, relapsed/resistant FL | P < 0.001b | P < 0.001b | P = 0.096 (not significant) | |
R-CHOP | n = 234 | 54 | 29.5% | 33.1 mo | 82.5% (at 3 yr) |
CHOP | n = 231 | 55 | 15.6% | 20.2 mo | 71.9% (at 3 yr) |
Table 4 Results of different randomized trials comparing no maintenance with maintenance therapy with rituximab or interferon after first line therapy in patients with follicular lymphoma
Author(s) or studies, maintenance therapy | No. of patients, target disease and randomization to therapies | Median age (yr) | Initial therapy,n (%) | CR rate | End point | ||
Median PFS | Median response duration | Overall survival | |||||
GLSG[43,46] | n = 105, relapsed or refractory FL | P = 0.035a | |||||
R-FCM | n = 52 | 59 | R-FCM: 41 (79) | Not reached | 32/41 (78%) | ||
FCM: 11 (21) | |||||||
Observation | n = 53 | 61 | R-FCM: 40 (75) | Not reached | 21/40 (53%) | ||
FCM: 13 (25) | |||||||
ECOG1496 study[47] | n = 311, stage III-IV indolent lymphoma (282 of 311 had FL) | 61 | CVP | P = 0.00006b | P = 0.012a | All: P = 0.05 | |
FL: P = 0.08 (trend towards significance) | |||||||
R-CVP | n = 153 | CVP | 22% | All: 68% (at 3 yr) | All: 92% (at 3 yr) | ||
FL: 64% (at 3 yr) | FL: 91% (at 3 yr) | ||||||
Observation | n = 158 | CVP | 7% | All: 33% (at 3 yr) | All: 86% (at 3 yr) | ||
FL: 33% (at 3 yr) | FL: 86% (at 3 yr) |
Table 5 Results of phase III clinical trials of idiotype vaccines in follicular lymphoma
Study | No. of patients, target disease | Regimen of induction therapy | Eligibility | Vaccine type | Vaccine production methodology | Primary end point |
Survival types, P-value, significance | ||||||
Biovest | n = 177, untreated FL | PACE or R-CHOP | CR | Id-KLH/GM-CSF | Rescue hybridoma | Disease-free survival, P > 0.05, not significant |
Genitope | n = 287, untreated FL | CVP | CR, PR | Id-KLH/GM-CSF | Recombinant DNA | Progression-free survival, P > 0.05, not significant |
Favrille | n = 349, untreated or recurrent FL | Rituximab | CR, PR, SD | Id-KLH/GM-CSF | Recombinant DNA | Time to progression, P > 0.05, not significant |
- Citation: Watanabe T. Treatment strategies for nodal and gastrointestinal follicular lymphoma: Current status and future development. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(44): 5543-5554
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i44/5543.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i44.5543