Iwamuro M, Okada H, Kawahara Y, Shinagawa K, Morito T, Yoshino T, Yamamoto K. Endoscopic features and prognoses of mantle cell lymphoma with gastrointestinal involvement. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(37): 4661-4669 [PMID: 20872966 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i37.4661]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Masaya Iwamuro, MD, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama 700-8558, Japan. iwamuromasaya@yahoo.co.jp
Article-Type of This Article
Original Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 7, 2010; 16(37): 4661-4669 Published online Oct 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i37.4661
Table 1 Characteristics of the 35 patients
n (%)
Male sex
32 (91.4)
Median age (range, yr)
67 (47-86)
Lugano staging system
Stage I
1
Stage II-1
1
Stage II-2
4
Stage IV
29
Involved site of gastrointestinal tract
Esophagus
2/35 (5.7)
Stomach
26/35 (74.3)
Duodenum
12/35 (34.3)
Ileum
10/21 (47.6)
Cecum
3/21 (14.3)
Colon
12/21 (57.1)
Rectum
10/21 (47.6)
Mitotic rate (Ki-67 index) (n = 19)
Low mitotic rate
9
High mitotic rate
10
MIPI score (n = 31)
Average score (range)
6.01 (5.31-6.85)
Low risk
6
Intermediate risk
15
High risk
10
Table 2 Gross findings of the gastrointestinal tract
Esophagus (n = 2)
Stomach (n = 26)
Intestines (n = 22)
Protruded
1
6
4
Fold thickening
-
6
-
MLP
-
-
17
Ulcerative
-
6
-
Superficial
1
7
1
Mixed
-
1
-
Table 3 Prognostic relevance of overall survival according to the univariate Cox regression
Prognostic factor
Comparison
n
RR
95% LCL
95% UCL
P
Age (yr)
≥ 60 vs < 60
35
3.00
0.81
19.42
0.107
Sex
Female vs male
35
3.42
0.53
12.88
0.167
LDH
Elevated vs normal
32
1.72
0.57
4.97
0.324
WBC count
Elevated vs normal
32
1.32
0.36
4.06
0.649
Stage
III and IV vs I and II
32
0.34
0.07
2.37
0.237
Bone marrow involvement
Present vs absent
35
1.21
0.40
3.51
0.720
Ki-67 positivity
High vs low
19
1.17
0.19
8.91
0.863
IPI
High risk vs other
32
0.49
0.03
2.55
0.450
MIPI
Other vs low risk
31
1.38
0.35
9.04
0.674
MIPI
High risk vs other
31
1.12
0.29
3.73
0.857
Treatment
Other vs hyper-CVAD/MA
35
6.18
1.64
40.21
0.005
Table 4 Prognostic relevance of event-free survival according to the univariate Cox regression
Prognostic factor
Comparison
n
RR
95% LCL
95% UCL
P
Age (yr)
≥ 60 vs < 60
35
5.27
1.47
33.77
0.007
Sex
Female vs male
35
2.67
0.61
8.39
0.170
LDH
Elevated vs normal
32
1.64
0.67
3.88
0.274
WBC count
Elevated vs normal
32
1.53
0.57
3.76
0.377
Stage
III and IV vs I and II
32
0.83
0.27
3.60
0.772
Bone marrow involvement
Present vs absent
35
1.24
0.49
2.95
0.639
Ki-67 positivity
High vs low
19
0.62
0.16
2.19
0.459
IPI
High risk vs other
32
1.07
0.25
3.24
0.918
MIPI
Other vs low risk
31
2.54
0.72
16.09
0.164
MIPI
High risk vs other
31
0.75
0.24
1.98
0.580
Treatment
Other vs hyper-CVAD/MA
35
2.81
1.02
9.25
0.044
Table 5 Prognostic relevance of event-free survival according to the multiple Cox regression
Prognostic factor
Comparison
RR
95% LCL
95% UCL
P
Age (yr)
≥ 60 vs < 60
4.17
0.95
29.25
0.059
Treatment
Other vs hyper-CVAD/MA
1.51
0.52
5.5
0.474
Citation: Iwamuro M, Okada H, Kawahara Y, Shinagawa K, Morito T, Yoshino T, Yamamoto K. Endoscopic features and prognoses of mantle cell lymphoma with gastrointestinal involvement. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(37): 4661-4669