Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2010; 16(25): 3196-3201
Published online Jul 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i25.3196
Published online Jul 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i25.3196
Table 1 ADC value and SNR for EHCC with different b value
| B value (s/mm2) | ADC (× 10-3 mm2/s) | SNR |
| 100 | 2.73 ± 0.55 | 135.81 ± 33.27 |
| 300 | 1.84 ± 0.42 | 99.17 ± 22.63 |
| 500 | 1.31 ± 0.29 | 69.31 ± 16.36 |
| 800 | 1.22 ± 0.29 | 47.90 ± 12.35 |
| 1000 | 0.89 ± 0.23 | 29.48 ± 9.72 |
| M | 136.23 | 142.79 |
| P | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
Table 2 Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of DWI and MRCP for EHCC
| Confirmed pathological diagnosis | Total | ||
| EHCC | Non-EHCC | ||
| DWI | |||
| EHCC | 33 | 0 | 33 |
| Non-EHCC | 2 | 21 | 23 |
| MRCP | |||
| EHCC | 26 | 6 | 32 |
| Non-EHCC | 9 | 15 | 24 |
| Total | 35 | 21 | 56 |
- Citation: Cui XY, Chen HW. Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(25): 3196-3201
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i25/3196.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i25.3196
