Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2010; 16(25): 3133-3143
Published online Jul 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i25.3133
Published online Jul 7, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i25.3133
Table 1 Patient characteristics at baseline
Characteristic | ITT population | KRAS population | ||||
KRAS wild-type | KRAS mutant | |||||
FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab (n = 77) | FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (n = 74) | FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab (n = 34) | FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (n = 28) | FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab (n = 23) | FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (n = 32) | |
Gender, n (%) | ||||||
Male | 43 (56) | 45 (61) | 22 (65) | 17 (61) | 11 (48) | 21 (66) |
Female | 34 (44) | 29 (39) | 12 (35) | 11 (39) | 12 (52) | 11 (34) |
Age (yr) | ||||||
Median (Q1-Q3) | 62.0 (54-67) | 62.5 (54-68) | 62.5 (55-67) | 64.0 (56-68) | 63.0 (49-68) | 62.5 (54-70) |
< 65, n (%) | 46 (60) | 46 (62) | 19 (56) | 17 (61) | 13 (57) | 19 (59) |
> 65, n (%) | 31 (40) | 28 (38) | 15 (44) | 11 (39) | 10 (43) | 13 (41) |
ECOG PS, n (%) | ||||||
0 | 46 (60) | 38 (51) | 20 (59) | 17 (61) | 13 (57) | 14 (44) |
1 | 31 (40) | 36 (49) | 14 (41) | 11 (39) | 10 (43) | 18 (56) |
Primary tumor location, n (%) | ||||||
Colon | 52 (68) | 47 (64) | 26 (76) | 15 (54) | 13 (57) | 22 (69) |
Rectum | 25 (32) | 27 (36) | 8 (24) | 13 (46) | 10 (43) | 10 (31) |
Metastasis1, n (%) | 45 (58)a | 46 (62) | 17 (50) | 18 (64) | 16 (70) | 18 (56) |
Organs with metastases, n (%) | ||||||
1-2 | 59 (77) | 56 (76) | 28 (82) | 23 (82) | 17 (74) | 26 (81) |
> 2 | 18 (23) | 18 (24) | 6 (18) | 5 (18) | 6 (26) | 6 (19) |
Metastatic sites2, n (%) | ||||||
Intestine/bowel | 12 (16) | 12 (16) | 3 (9) | 6 (21) | 6 (26) | 5 (16) |
Liver | 66 (86) | 63 (85) | 30 (88) | 24 (86) | 20 (87) | 26 (81) |
Lung | 27 (35) | 28 (38) | 11 (32) | 10 (36) | 8 (35) | 10 (31) |
Lymph nodes | ||||||
Chest | 7 (9) | 5 (7) | 2 (6) | 2 (7) | 3 (13) | 2 (6) |
Abdomen | 22 (29) | 24 (32) | 9 (26) | 8 (29) | 5 (22) | 8 (25) |
Bone | 2 (3) | 4 (5) | 0 (0) | 1 (4) | 2 (9) | 1 (3) |
Other | 10 (13) | 10 (14) | 5 (15) | 3 (11) | 2 (9) | 4 (13) |
Duration of disease, mo | ||||||
CRC, median (Q1-Q3) | 2.1a (1-15) | 1.9 (1-14) | 2.2 (1-18) | 1.8 (1-6) | 1.8 (1-3) | 2.4 (1-18) |
mCRC median (Q1-Q3) | 1.4 (1-2) | 1.2 (1-2) | 1.1 (1-2) | 1.0 (1-2) | 1.3 (1-2) | 1.4 (1-2) |
EGFR status, n (%) | ||||||
Detectable | 43 (56) | 46 (62) | 21 (62) | 20 (71) | 17 (74) | 24 (75) |
Undetectable | 17 (22) | 12 (16) | 10 (29) | 4 (14) | 5 (22) | 7 (22) |
Non evaluable | 17 (22) | 16 (22) | 3 (9) | 4 (14) | 1 (4) | 1 (3) |
Prior treatment, n (%) | ||||||
At least 1 therapy | 63 (82) | 59 (80) | 31 (91) | 22 (79) | 19 (83) | 29 (91) |
Adjuvant chemotherapy3 | 14 (18) | 10 (14) | 9 (26) | 2 (7) | 2 (9) | 6 (19) |
Surgery | 61 (79) | 58 (78) | 30 (88) | 22 (79) | 18 (78) | 29 (91) |
Other | 8 (10) | 5 (7) | 3 (9) | 2 (7) | 3 (13) | 2 (6) |
Table 2 Treatment exposure in the safety population
Characteristic | FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab (arm A, n = 77) | FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (arm B, n = 74) |
Exposure to cetuximab (Q1-Q3) | ||
Median duration, wk | 28.0 (17-46) | 29.1 (13-46) |
Median number of infusions | 26.0 (14-40) | 26.0 (12-42) |
Relative dose intensity, n (%) | ||
Only initial dose | 4 (5) | 3 (4) |
< 60% | 2 (3) | 3 (4) |
60% to < 80% | 15 (19) | 8 (11) |
80% to < 90% | 21 (27) | 20 (27) |
≥ 90% | 35 (45) | 40 (54) |
Exposure to chemotherapy (Q1-Q3) | ||
Median duration, wk | 25.1 (19-28) | 25.5 (14-28) |
Median number of cycles | 12 (7-12) | 12 (6-12) |
Relative dose intensity, n (%) | ||
Oxaliplatin | ||
No dose | 1 (1) | 74 (100) |
< 60% | 4 (5) | - |
60% to < 80% | 24 (31) | - |
80% to < 90% | 22 (29) | - |
≥ 90% | 26 (34) | - |
Irinotecan | ||
No dose | 77 (100) | 2 (3) |
< 60% | - | 3 (4) |
60% to < 80% | - | 18 (24) |
80% to < 90% | - | 13 (18) |
≥ 90% | - | 38 (51) |
Bolus 5-FU | ||
No dose | 1 (1) | 2 (3) |
< 60% | 1 (1) | 2 (3) |
60% to < 80% | 28 (36) | 19 (26) |
80% to < 90% | 19 (25) | 14 (19) |
≥ 90% | 28 (36) | 37 (50) |
Continuous infusion 5-FU | ||
No dose | 1 (1) | 2 (3) |
< 60% | 1 (1) | 3 (4) |
60% to < 80% | 21 (27) | 14 (19) |
80% to < 90% | 13 (17) | 11 (15) |
≥ 90% | 41 (53) | 44 (59) |
Dose reductions1, n (%) | ||
Cetuximab | 9 (12) | 5 (7) |
Chemotherapy | 25 (32) | 17 (23) |
Treatment delays1, n (%) | ||
Any cetuximab | ||
≥ 3 d | 59 (77) | 47 (64) |
≥ 16 d | 12 (16) | 8 (11) |
Any chemotherapy | ||
≥ 3 d | 59 (77) | 51 (69) |
≥ 14 d | 25 (32) | 15 (20) |
Treatment discontinuation1, n (%) | ||
Cetuximab | 13 (17) | 9 (12) |
Chemotherapy | 9 (12) | 4 (5) |
Table 3 Efficacy in the ITT population
Characteristic | FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab (arm A, n = 77) | FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (arm B, n = 74) |
PFS | ||
Events, n (%) | 61 (79) | 59 (80) |
Median1, mo (95% CI) | 8.6 (6.3-9.7) | 8.3 (7.4-8.7) |
Log rank P-value | 0.7375 | |
Hazard ratio (95% CI) | 1.06 (0.74-1.52) | |
PFS rate1, % (95% CI) | ||
3 mo | 92 (85-98) | 78 (68-88) |
6 mo | 69 (58-80) | 69 (58-80) |
9 mo | 45 (33-58) | 34 (23-46) |
12 mo | 18 (8-27) | 18 (8-27) |
Overall survival | ||
Events, n (%) | 54 (70) | 50 (68) |
Median1, mo (95% CI) | 17.4 (14.9-22.6) | 18.9 (14.7-23.9) |
Logrank P-value | 0.9230 | |
Hazard ratio2 (95% CI) | 0.98 (0.67-1.44) | |
Survival rate1, % (95% CI) | ||
9 mo | 79 (70-88) | 79 (70-89) |
12 mo | 70 (60-80) | 71 (60-81) |
18 mo | 46 (35-57) | 53 (42-65) |
24 mo | 33 (22-44) | 38 (26-50) |
Best overall response, n (%) | ||
CR | 2 (3) | 6 (8) |
PR | 31 (40) | 27 (36) |
SD | 31 (40) | 24 (32) |
PD | 6 (8) | 9 (12) |
NE | 7 (9) | 8 (11) |
Objective response rate, n (%) | 33 (43) | 33 (45) |
95% CI | 32-55 | 33-57 |
Odds ratio (95% CI) | 0.93 (0.49-1.77) |
Table 4 Efficacy in the KRAS population
Parameter | KRAS population | FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab (arm A) | FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (arm B) | |||
KRAS wild-type (n = 62) | KRAS mutation (n = 55) | KRAS wild-type (n = 34) | KRAS mutation (n = 23) | KRAS wild-type (n = 28) | KRAS mutation (n = 32) | |
PFS | ||||||
Events, n (%) | 46 (74) | 47 (85) | 26 (76) | 20 (87) | 20 (71) | 27 (84) |
Median1, mo (95% CI) | 8.9 (7.3-11.1) | 7.8 (6.4-8.4) | 9.1 (8.3-11.1) | 7.2 (5.5-9.7) | 8.4 (3.2-11.3) | 8.1 (7.3-8.5) |
Logrank P-value | 0.0051 | 0.0196 | 0.1737 | |||
HR2 (95% CI) | 0.55 (0.36-0.84) | 0.49 (0.27-0.91) | 0.66 (0.36-1.21) | |||
PFS rate1, % (95% CI) | ||||||
3 mo | 81 (70-91) | 88 (80-97) | 90 (80-100) | 91 (79-100) | 69 (51-87) | 87 (75-99) |
6 mo | 70 (58-82) | 70 (57-83) | 77 (62-92) | 62 (41-83) | 61 (42-80) | 76 (60-91) |
9 mo | 49 (35-62) | 26 (14-39) | 53 (35-71) | 31 (11-52) | 43 (24-63) | 23 (7-39) |
12 mo | 29 (17-41) | 11 (2-20) | 28 (12-45) | 10 (0-24) | 30 (12-49) | 11 (0-24) |
Overall survival | ||||||
Events, n (%) | 37 (60) | 45 (82) | 21 (62) | 20 (87) | 16 (57) | 25 (78) |
Median1, mo (95% CI) | 20.8 (16.6-26.9) | 15.9 (14.4-18.9) | 22.5 (17.1-28.9) | 15.2 (11.1-17.3) | 19.9 (11.9-na) | 18.9 (14.5-23.9) |
Logrank P-value | 0.0296 | 0.0201 | 0.3608 | |||
HR2 (95% CI) | 0.62 (0.40-0.96) | 0.48 (0.26-0.90) | 0.74 (0.39-1.40) | |||
Survival rate1 (95% CI) | ||||||
9 mo | 79 (69-89) | 87 (78-96) | 85 (73-97) | 83 (67-98) | 71 (54-88) | 90 (80-100) |
12 mo | 72 (61-83) | 74 (63-86) | 76 (62-91) | 65 (46-85) | 67 (49-85) | 81 (67-95) |
18 mo | 55 (42-68) | 41 (28-55) | 55 (38-72) | 24 (6-42) | 56 (37-74) | 54 (36-72) |
24 mo | 44 (31-57) | 24 (12-36) | 43 (25-61) | 14 (0-29) | 45 (26-65) | 32 (14-49) |
Best overall response, n (%) | ||||||
CR | 6 (10) | 1 (2) | 2 (6) | - | 4 (14) | 1 (3) |
PR | 27 (44) | 19 (35) | 17 (50) | 7 (30) | 10 (36) | 12 (38) |
SD | 14 (23) | 26 (47) | 9 (26) | 12 (52) | 5 (18) | 14 (44) |
PD | 8 (13) | 6 (11) | 3 (9) | 3 (13) | 5 (18) | 3 (9) |
NE | 7 (11) | 3 (5) | 3 (9) | 1 (4) | 4 (14) | 2 (6) |
ORR, n (%) | 33 (53) | 20 (36) | 19 (56) | 7 (30) | 14 (50) | 13 (41) |
95% CI | 40-66 | 24-50 | 38-73 | 13-53 | 31-69 | 24-59 |
Odds ratio (95% CI) | 1.99 (0.95-4.18) | 2.90 (0.95-8.84) | 1.46 (0.53-4.07) |
Table 5 Grade 3/4 adverse events related to study treatment and special adverse event categories in the safety and KRAS populations n (%)
Adverse event | FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab (arm A) | FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (arm B) | ||
Grade 3/4a | Grade 4 | Grade 3/4a | Grade 4 | |
Safety populationb | ||||
Any related AE | 48 (62) | 12 (16) | 37 (50) | 6 (8) |
Neutropenia | 22 (29) | 9 (12) | 15 (20) | 4 (5) |
Diarrhea | 7 (9) | - | 9 (12) | - |
Rash | 5 (6) | - | 3 (4) | - |
Dermatitis acneiform | 4 (5) | - | 2 (3) | - |
Special AE categories | ||||
Skin reactionsc | 11 (14) | - | 6 (8) | - |
Acne-like rashd | 10 (13) | - | 6 (8) | - |
Infusion-related reactionse | 5 (6) | 2 (3) | 1 (1) | 1 (1) |
Allergy/anaphylaxis | 5 (6) | 2 (3) | 1 (1) | 1 (1) |
KRAS wild-type populationf | ||||
Any related AE | 24 (71) | 5 (15) | 10 (36) | 1 (4) |
Neutropenia | 12 (35) | 3 (9) | 3 (11) | 1 (4) |
Diarrhea | 3 (9) | - | 2 (7) | - |
Dermatitis acneiform | 3 (9) | - | - | - |
Mucosal inflammation | 3 (9) | - | - | - |
Rash | 2 (6) | - | - | - |
Neuropathy peripheral | 2 (6) | - | - | - |
Hypersensitivity | 2 (6) | 1 (3) | - | - |
Special AE categories | ||||
Skin reactionsc | 6 (18) | - | 1 (4) | - |
Acne-like skin rashd | 5 (15) | - | 1 (4) | - |
Infusion-related reactionse | 2 (6) | 1 (3) | - | - |
Allergy/anaphylaxis | 2 (6) | 1 (3) | - | - |
KRAS mutation populationg | ||||
Any related AE | 14 (61) | 4 (17) | 18 (56) | 4 (13) |
Neutropenia | 6 (26) | 3 (13) | 9 (28) | 2 (6) |
Diarrhea | 3 (13) | - | 4 (13) | - |
Thrombocytopenia | 2 (9) | - | - | - |
Rash | 1 (4) | - | 2 (6) | - |
Mucosal inflammation | - | - | 2 (6) | - |
Dehydration | - | - | 2 (6) | |
Special AE categories | ||||
Skin reactionsc | 2 (9) | - | 3 (9) | - |
Acne-like rashd | 2 (9) | - | 3 (9) | - |
Infusion-related reactionse | 2 (9) | 1 (4) | 1 (3) | 1 (3) |
Allergy/anaphylaxis | 2 (9) | 1 (4) | 1 (3) | 1 (3) |
- Citation: Ocvirk J, Brodowicz T, Wrba F, Ciuleanu TE, Kurteva G, Beslija S, Koza I, Pápai Z, Messinger D, Yilmaz U, Faluhelyi Z, Yalcin S, Papamichael D, Wenczl M, Mrsic-Krmpotic Z, Shacham-Shmueli E, Vrbanec D, Esser R, Scheithauer W, Zielinski CC. Cetuximab plus FOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer: CECOG trial. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(25): 3133-3143
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i25/3133.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i25.3133