Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2010; 16(18): 2260-2264
Published online May 14, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i18.2260
Published online May 14, 2010. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i18.2260
Table 1 Indication for use of the stent in 65 patients
n (%) | |
Esophageal carcinoma | 51 (78.5) |
Adenocarcinoma | 31 |
Squamous-cell carcinoma | 20 |
Complications of esophagogastric anastomosis | 8 (12.3) |
Fistula | 3 |
Stricture | 3 |
Tumor recurrence | 2 |
Extrinsic compression | 4 (6.1) |
Lung cancer | 2 |
Pleural mesothelioma | 1 |
Mediastinal lymphoma | 1 |
Post-radiotherapy stricture | 2 (3.1) |
Table 2 Classification of dysphagia
Grade | Definition |
0 | Normal swallowing |
1 | Able to swallow some solid food |
2 | Able to swallow semi-liquid food |
3 | Able to swallow liquids only |
4 | Absolute dysphagia |
Table 3 Demographic and clinical data of the patient population
Total | Ultraflex | Choostent | P-value | |
Patients | 65 | 33 | 32 | - |
Male/female | 43/22 | 23/10 | 20/12 | 0.5 |
Mean age (range) | 67.5 (34-86) | 66.8 (34-83) | 68.3 (42-86) | 0.6 |
Grade of dysphagia (mean ± SD) | 3.4 ± 0.4 | 3.4 ± 0.3 | 3.5 ± 0.4 | 0.9 |
Diagnosis | ||||
Adenocarcinoma | 31 | 16 | 15 | 0.9 |
Squamous cell carcinoma | 20 | 11 | 9 | 0.8 |
Extrinsic compression | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0.9 |
Anastomotic fistula | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0.6 |
Anastomotic stricture | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0.5 |
Anastomotic recurrence | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.9 |
Post-radiotherapy stricture | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.1 |
Site of lesion | ||||
Cervical | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0.6 |
Upper thoracic | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0.3 |
Middle thoracic | 21 | 11 | 10 | 0.9 |
Lower thoracic | 32 | 14 | 18 | 0.4 |
Tumor stage (n = 51) | ||||
III | 19 | 12 | 7 | 0.6 |
IVA | 17 | 8 | 9 | 0.7 |
IVB | 15 | 7 | 8 | 0.5 |
Table 4 In-hospital characteristics and long-term outcome after stent placement
Ultraflex (n = 33) | Choostent (n = 32) | P-value | |
Duration of the procedure (min) | 16 (12-35) | 17 (13-27) | 0.8 |
Median hospital stay (d) | 2 (2-7) | 2 (2-4) | 0.7 |
Hospital mortality (%) | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
Hospital morbidity (%) | 6.1 (2/33) | 6.2 (2/32) | 0.8 |
Pain score (scale 0-10) | 6.3 | 4.8 | 0.2 |
Residual dysphagia (grade) | 1.9 ± 0.3 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 0.6 |
Mean survival (mo) | 6.5 (1-19) | 6 (3-26) | 0.7 |
Table 5 Early and late complications after stent placement
n (%) | Ultraflex (n = 33) | Choostent (n = 32) | P-value | |
Abrasion of soft palate | 1 (1.5) | 1 | 0 | 0.3 |
Odynophagia | 1 (1.5) | 0 | 1 | 0.3 |
Malposition | 1 (1.5) | 0 | 1 | 0.3 |
Late distal migration | 3 (4.6) | 2 | 1 | 0.6 |
Persistent chest pain | 3 (4.6) | 2 | 1 | 0.6 |
Persistent hiccups | 3 (4.6) | 1 | 2 | 0.6 |
Gastroesophageal reflux | 14 (22) | 7 | 7 | 0.9 |
Food obstruction | 5 (7.6) | 2 | 3 | 0.6 |
- Citation: Bona D, Laface L, Bonavina L, Abate E, Schaffer M, Ugenti I, Siboni S, Carrinola R. Covered nitinol stents for the treatment of esophageal strictures and leaks. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(18): 2260-2264
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v16/i18/2260.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i18.2260