Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2009; 15(5): 526-530
Published online Feb 7, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.526
Published online Feb 7, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.526
Table 1 Clinicopathological data for reported cases of anaplastic carcinoma of the small intestine
Case | Author | Yr | Age | Gender | Chief complaint | Primary site | Tumor size (cm) | Tumor depth | Lymph node metastasis | Prognosis (mo) |
1 | Ikeda[22] | 1974 | 62 | F | Abdominal pain | Ileum | 9 | SE | Negative | Alive 12 |
2 | Sasaki[23] | 1988 | 37 | M | Abdominal pain | Jejunum | 7 | SS | Positive | 9 |
3 | Robey-Cafferty[24] | 1989 | 62 | M | Cervical LN enlarge | Ileum | 5 | SI | ND | 20 |
4 | 38 | F | Fatigue | Jejunum | 16 | MP | Positive | 8 | ||
5 | 48 | F | Periumbilical mass | Jejunum | 6 | SI | Positive | 2 | ||
6 | 65 | M | Abdominal pain | Jejunum | 5 | SE | Positive | 5 | ||
7 | 54 | F | intestinal obstruction | Ileum | 4.5 | MP | Negative | Alive 12 | ||
8 | 35 | F | Abdominal pain | Jejunum | 7.5 | ND | Negative | 36 | ||
9 | Ikeguchi[25] | 1993 | 63 | M | Abdominal pain | Ileum | 4 | SS | Negative | Alive 36 |
10 | Amano[26] | 1998 | 81 | M | Abdominal pain | Jejunum | 8.5 | SE | Positive | 1 |
11 | Agrawal[27] | 1999 | 53 | M | melena | Ileum | 13 | SI | Positive | 2 |
12 | Nakamura[28] | 2000 | 73 | F | Vomiting | Ileum | 3.5 | SS | Negative | 6 |
13 | Kadoya[29] | 2003 | 57 | M | General fatigue | Ileum | 21 | SE | Positive | 2 |
14 | Sato[30] | 2003 | 46 | M | Back pain | Jejunum | 9 | SE | ND | 4 |
15 | Usuda[31] | 2007 | 84 | M | Fever of unknown origin | Jejunum | 8 | SE | Positive | 1.5 |
16 | Shiraishi[32] | 2007 | 48 | M | Abdominal pain | Jejunum | 5 | SE | Negative | Alive 8 |
17 | Matsuoka[33] | 2008 | 56 | M | Abdominal pain | Jejunum | 10 | SS | Positive | 1 |
18 | Our case | 2008 | 65 | F | Anemia | Ileum | 6 | SS | Negative | Alive 8 |
Table 2 Clinical characteristics after surgical resection of anaplastic carcinoma of the small intestine (mean ± SD)
Characteristics | No. of patients | 3 yr survival rate (%) | Median survival in months | P value |
Overall | 17 | 10.8 | 5.0 ± 1.4 | |
Age (yr) | ||||
< 65 | 13 | 15 | 9.0 ± 4.2 | 0.03 |
> 65 | 5 | 0 | 5.0 ± 1.6 | |
Gender | ||||
Male | 11 | 12.1 | 4.0 ± 1.5 | 0.38 |
Female | 7 | 0 | 8.0 ± 2.6 | |
Tumor depth | ||||
T2 (MP) | 2 | 66.7 | 26.7 ± 7.6 | 0.21 |
T3 (SS) | 5 | 0 | 6.0 ± 1.5 | |
T4 (SE, SI) | 10 | 0 | 2.0 ± 1.0 | |
Tumor location | ||||
Jejunum | 10 | 0 | 4.0 ± 2.4 | 0.17 |
Ileum | 8 | 25 | 6.0 ± 7.0 | |
Tumor size (cm) | ||||
< 7 | 8 | 28.6 | 20.0 ± 10.9 | |
> 7 | 10 | 0 | 2.0 ± 1.3 | 0.13 |
LN metastasis | ||||
Negative | 7 | 41.7 | 36.0 ± 21.9 | 0.0009 |
Positive | 9 | 0 | 2.0 ± 0.3 |
Table 3 Relative risk with regard to survival rate according to the Cox proportional hazards model
Variable | Odds ratio (95% CI) | P value |
Lymph node metastasis | ||
Negative | 13.7 (1.6-114.1) | 0.016 |
Positive | ||
Age (yr) | ||
< 65 | 2.9 (0.7-11.8) | 0.145 |
> 65 |
Table 4 Survival rates of patients with adenocarcinoma of the small intestine according to pathological differentiation
Author | Differentiation | No. of patients | Survival rate (%) | Significance | |
5 yr | 10 yr | ||||
Miles[7] | Well differentiated | 13 | 15 | 8 | 0.18 |
Undifferentiated | 5 | 60 | 33 | ||
Veyrieres[10] | Well differentiated | 51 | >56 | 43 | 0.08 |
Undifferentiated | 6 | 40 | 0 | ||
Dabaja[11] | Well differentiated | >92 | 25 | 0.45 | |
Undifferentiated | 57 | 24 | |||
Wu[13] | Well differentiated | 33 | 88.7 ± 18.881 | 0.26 | |
Undifferentiated | 10 | 13.3 ± 3.961 | |||
Robey-Cafferty[24] | Well differentiated | 29 | 25 | 0.24 | |
Undifferentiated | 6 | 0 |
- Citation: Namikawa T, Hanazaki K. Clinical analysis of primary anaplastic carcinoma of the small intestine. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(5): 526-530
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i5/526.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.526