Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2009; 15(38): 4810-4815
Published online Oct 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.4810
Published online Oct 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.4810
Table 1 Results of physical examination and 3D-EAUS findings in the identification of the primary fistula tract
| Classification based on surgical findings | Overall accuracy | |||
| Intersphincteric (n = 26) | Transsphincteric (n = 34) | Suprasphincteric (n = 4) | ||
| Physical examination | ||||
| Intersphincteric | 201 | 9 | 0 | |
| Transsphincteric | 7 | 231 | 2 | 68.7% (44/64)a |
| Suprasphincteric | 0 | 2 | 11 | |
| 3D-EAUS | ||||
| Intersphincteric | 241 | 4 | 0 | |
| Transsphincteric | 4 | 291 | 1 | 84.4% (54/64)b |
| Suprasphincteric | 0 | 1 | 11 | |
| H2O2 3D-EAUS | ||||
| Intersphincteric | 241 | 3 | 0 | |
| Transsphincteric | 2 | 301 | 1 | 89.1% (57/64)c |
| Suprasphincteric | 0 | 1 | 31 | |
Table 2 Results of physical examination and 3D-EAUS findings in classification of secondary extensions
| Classification based on surgical findings (No. of secondary extensions detected) | Overall accuracy | ||||
| Absent (37) | Intersphincteric (7) | Ischiorectal (19) | Supralevator (3) | ||
| Physical examination | |||||
| Absent | 241 | 1 | 3 | ||
| Intersphincteric | 5 | 41 | 3 | 2 | |
| Ischiorectal | 8 | 2 | 121 | 62.1% (41/66)a | |
| Supralevator | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | |
| 3D-EAUS | |||||
| Absent | 321 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| Intersphincteric | 2 | 51 | 1 | 2 | |
| Ischiorectal | 3 | 2 | 161 | 0 | 81.8% (54/66)b |
| Supralevator | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | |
| H2O2 3D-EAUS | |||||
| Absent | 331 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Intersphincteric | 1 | 51 | 1 | 0 | |
| Ischiorectal | 3 | 2 | 171 | 0 | 86.4% (57/66)c |
| Supralevator | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | |
Table 3 Results of physical examination and 3D-EAUS findings in localization of the internal opening
| Classification based on surgical findings (No. of internal openings detected) | Overall accuracy | ||||
| Anterior (12) | Left lateral (8) | Posterior (31) | Right lateral (6) | ||
| Physical examination | |||||
| Anterior | 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Left lateral | 2 | 51 | 1 | 0 | |
| Posterior | 0 | 1 | 201 | 1 | 59.7% (34/57)a |
| Right lateral | 0 | 0 | 2 | 31 | |
| 3D-EAUS | |||||
| Anterior | 101 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Left lateral | 0 | 61 | 0 | 0 | |
| Posterior | 0 | 1 | 261 | 0 | 84.2% (48/57)b |
| Right lateral | 0 | 0 | 1 | 61 | |
| H2O2 3D-EAUS | |||||
| Anterior | 101 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Left lateral | 0 | 71 | 0 | 0 | |
| Posterior | 0 | 0 | 281 | 0 | 89.5% (51/57)c |
| Right lateral | 0 | 0 | 1 | 61 | |
- Citation: Kim Y, Park YJ. Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonographic assessment of an anal fistula with and without H2O2 enhancement. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(38): 4810-4815
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i38/4810.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.4810
