Editorial
Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2009; 15(30): 3713-3724
Published online Aug 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3713
Table 1 Baseline assessment before starting treatment in HCV-HIV co-infected patients
Assessment of liver diseases status CTP staging HCV-RNA HCV genotype AFP and USG/CT scan for HCC HBV markers (HBsAg and anti-HBc) HBV-DNA for patients with isolated anti-HBc to detect low level viremia Anti-HAV IgG Assessment of HIV disease status Current and past opportunistic infections HIV-associated malignancy CD4 count HIV viral load Details of HAART Assessment for problems precluding therapy or requiring control before therapy TSH Screening for depression or other psychiatric diseases Complete blood count Blood sugar History of significant cardiac, renal, or pulmonary disease Fundus examination for retinopathy Beta HCG to exclude pregnancy in females Urine toxicology screening to exclude concurrent active substance abuse Social support and treatment compliance
Table 2 Trials of anti-HCV treatment in HIV patients
Author (yr) Country n Schedule Duration Overall response (%) GT-2/3 GT-1/4 ETR SVR ETR SVR ETR SVR Pérez-Olmeda et al [39 ] (2003) Spain 68 PEG-IFN 150 μg/wk × 12 wk, then 100 μg/wk + RBV 400 mg bid 6 mo for GT-1/4 and 12 mo for GT-3 30.3 24.2 811 52.3 30.3 24.2 Cargnel et al [40 ] (2005) Italy Multi Center 135 PEG-IFN 1.5 μg/kg per week + RBV 400 bid 48 wk 28.9 21.7 43.7 34.4 18.7 9.4 PEG-IFN 1.5 μg/kg per week 16.7 9.1 16.2 10.8 14.7 8.8 Bräu et al [41 ] (2004) United States 107 IFN α-2b 3 mu tiw + RBV 800 mg /d vs 48 wk 18.9 11.3 50 41.7 10 2.5 IFN α 2b 3 mu tiw + placebo × 16 wk, then RBV 800 mg/d 7.4 5.6 Laguno et al [42 ] (2004) Spain 95 IFN α 2b 3 mu tiw + RBV 800-1200 mg/d vs 48 wk for GT-¼ and 24 wk for HT-2/3 301 211 67 47 11 7 PEG-IFN 100-150 μg/wk + RBV 800-1200 mg/d 52 44 68 53 41 38 Myers et al [43 ] (2004) Canada 32 PEG-IFN α 2b (1.5 μg/kg per week) + weight based RBV (1000 mg for 75 kg or less or 1200 mg for > 75 kg) in IFN non responders 48 wk 19 16 29 9 Chung et al [44 ] (2004) ACTG United States 133 PEG-IFN α 2a 180 μg/wk + RBV (400 mg/d × 4 wk- 600 mg/d × 4 wk - 1000 mg/d vs 48 wk 411 271 801 731 331 29 IFN α 2a 6 mu tiw × 12 wk, then 3 mu tiw +RBV as above 12 12 33 33 6 6 Moreno et al [45 ] (2004) Spain 35 PEG-IFN 50 μg/wk + RBV 800 mg/d 48 wk 31 70 25 Torriani et al [46 ] (2004) APRICOT 868 PEG-IFN α 2a 180 μg/wk + RBV 800 mg/d vs 48 wk 47 401 64 621 38 29 PEG-IFN α 2a + Placebo vs 31 20 57 36 21 14 IFN α 2a 3 mu tiw + RBV 14 12 27 20 8 7 Carrat et al [47 ] (2004) RIBAVIC France Multi Center 412 PEG-IFN α 2b 1.5 μg/kg per week + RBV 800 mg/d vs 48 wk 351 271 50 43.7 25.6 16.81 IFN α 2b 3 mu tiw + RBV 800 mg/d 21 20 47.4 43.4 6.2 6.2 Khalili et al [48 ] (2005) United States 154 PEG-IFN α 2a 180 μg/wk 48 wk 55 35 NA PEG-IFN + Placebo 3 0 PEG-IFN + RBV 800 mg/d 11 5 Hopkins et al [49 ] (2006) United Kingdom 45 PEG-IFN α 2b 1.5 μg/kg per week + RBV (1000-1200 mg/d) 24 wk for GT- 2/3 and 48 wk for GT-1 62 53 82 751 25 19 Moreno et al [50 ] (2006) Spain 70 (HCV) PEG-IFN α 2b 1.5 μg/kg per week + RBV 10.6 mg/kg per day 48 wk 46 371 All patients had GT-1 or 4 infection and the overall ETR and SVR were 39 and 30% respectively 36 (HCV +HIV) 25 171 Santin et al [51 ] (2006) Spain Multi Center 60 PEG-IFN α 2b 80-150 μg/wk + RBV 800-1200 mg/d 24 wk for GT 2/3 and 48 wk for GT ¼ 33 27 53 42 24 201 Voigt et al [52 ] (2006) Germany Multi Center 122 PEG-IFN α 2b 1.5 μg/kg per week + RBV 800 mg/d 24 wk for GT 2/3 and 48 wk for GT ¼ 52 25 72 44 41 181 Fuster et al [53 ] (2006) Spain Multi Center 110 PEG-IFN 180 μg/wk + RBV 800 mg/d 24 wk for GT 2/3 and 48 wk for GT ¼ 53 42 68 55 47 33 Righi et al [54 ] (2008) Italy 43 PEG-IFN 2a 180 μg/wk or 2b 1.5 μg/kg per week + RBV (10.6 mg/kg per day) 24 wk for GT 3 and 48 wk for GT-1a 51 30 38 24
Table 3 Barriers against anti-HCV therapy in co-infected patients
Patient-related factors Active substance abuse Concern regarding adverse effects Cost of treatment Lack of social support Lack of transport Number of pills and dosing frequency (including HAART) Physician-related factors Lack of experience Lack of awareness Lack of motivation for referral Fear of adverse effects
Table 4 Morbidity and mortality with PEG-IFN + RBV: results of three large trials
Parameter Sub-parameter ACTG (n = 66) APRICOT (n = 286) RIBAVIC (n = 194) Treatment related adverse events Influenza like symptoms 31 (47) 172 (89) Fatigue 128 (44) Pyrexia 128 (44) Headache 111 (39) Myalgia 103 (36) Nausea 85 (30) Diarrhea 81 (28) Depression 7 (11) 76 (26) 46 (24) Weight loss 82 (28 46 (24) Injection site reaction 44 (21) Anorexia 38 (20) Irritability 32 (16) Bronchitis/cough 26 (13) Insomnia 76 (26) 19 (10) Elevated lipase/amylase 9 (14) Glucose: high or low 19 (28) HIV-related adverse events Lipodystrophy 37 (19) Oral candidiasis 2 (< 1) 30 (15) AIDS defining event 2 (< 1) Specific serious adverse events Psychiatric disorders 8 (4) Liver failure 1 (< 1) 4 (2) Liver decompensation 5 (2) Pneumonia/sepsis 2 (1) 6 (3) Symptomatic increased lactate 4 (1) 9 (5) Pancreatitis 2 (1) Lactic acidosis 0 (0) 2 (1) ELAT > 10 ULN 20 (30) 16 (8) Neutropenia < 500/μL 5 (8) 10 (5) Anemia 2 (3) 6 (2) Thrombocytopenia 1 (2) 1 (< 1) Drug abuse 4 (1) Deep vein thrombosis 3 (1) Bacterial infection 3 (1) Gastroenteritis 2 (1) Any serious event Total 50 (17) 68 (35) Treatment-related 24 (8) 30 (15) Deaths Total 1 (2) 4 (1) 5 (3)
Table 5 Hepatotoxicity of highly active anti-retroviral therapy drugs and guidelines for their use in patients with liver disease
Group Drug Dose adjustment NRTI Didanosine Use cautiously NNRTI Delavirdine, Efavirenz, Nevirapine Caution with hepatic impairment PIs Lopinavir, Nelfinavir, Ritonavir, Saquinavir Caution with hepatic impairment Atazanavir Reduce 25% of dose in patients with CTP stage B and C Indinavir Reduce dose by 25% in CTP stage B and C Tipranavir Avoid in patients with CTP stage B or C Fosamprenavir Avoid in patients with CTP stage C Darunavir Avoid in patients with CTP stage C
Table 6 Recommendations for management of HCV in HIV patients
All HIV patients should be screened for concomitant HCV infection Effective management of HCV is crucial to improve the survival of HIV patients Patients with stage 2 or more disease are candidates for therapy provided their HIV disease is controlled Pegylated interferon and weight based ribavirin combination is recommended Liver transplantation is no longer a contra-indication in the presence of HIV and should be considered in appropriate patients Patients with cirrhosis should be screened for esophageal varices and for hepatocellular carcinoma