Copyright
©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2009; 15(1): 55-60
Published online Jan 7, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.55
Published online Jan 7, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.55
Table 1 Differences between the three short-wire systems
| Characteristics | RX system | Fusion system | V-system |
| Type of endoscope | Standard | Standard | V-scope |
| Type of lock | External at the biopsy port | External at the biopsy port | Internal lock design |
| Type of device | Open channel tear-away | Close channel breakthrough | Close lumen device |
| Short–track technology | Yes | Yes | No |
| Wire length | 260 cm | 185 cm | 270 cm |
| Can be used with standard guidewires | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Can be used with 0.025” or 0.018” or angled wires | No | Yes | Yes |
| Can be used with hydrophilic Glidewire | No | Yes | Yes |
| Ability to flush wire channel | No | Yes | Yes |
| Intraductal exchange ability | No | Yes | No |
| Insertion of multiple stents without the need to recannulate | No | Yes | No |
| Physician control of wire | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Pushability of short-wire devices1 | ++ | +++ | +++ |
Table 2 Short-wire system potential advantages
| Advantages |
| Reduced exchange times |
| Reduced stent insertion times |
| Maintenance of ductal access |
| Reduction of sedation and fluoroscopy time |
| Increased endoscopist control of cannulation |
| Locking of wire in position to increase stability |
| Decreased rates of post-ERCP pancreatitis |
| Decreased trauma when ampullary surface is manipulated |
| Reduced rates of wire adjustments |
| Aids in stricture access |
| Allows placements of multiple stents (Fusion system only) |
Table 3 Short-wire system potential drawbacks
| Drawbacks |
| Only preliminary studies have documented the potential benefit of the short-wire systems (all systems) |
| Hydraulic exchange technique not plausible with RX system |
| Decreased pushability with the open channel design of the RX system |
| Inability to flush channel for hydrophilic wire use (RX system) |
| Inability to use smaller than 0.035 inch or angled wires when channel is torn after first device exchange (unless device is preloaded) (RX system) |
| Deterioration of the device after multiple exchanges (RX, Fusion systems) |
| No easy method for insertion of pancreatic stents (all systems) |
| No reliable method of locking wire (V-system) |
| Looping of wire between the biopsy port and the external locking device (RX, Fusion systems) |
| Poor guidewire visibility (V-system) |
| Air and bile leakage causing increased soiling of operators (RX, Fusion systems) |
| Wires may suspend freely in air after being locked jeopardizing operators (all systems) |
| Loss of visibility due to decreased distention of the duodenum (RX, Fusion systems) |
- Citation: Reddy SC, Draganov PV. ERCP wire systems: The long and the short of it. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15(1): 55-60
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v15/i1/55.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.55
