Copyright
        ©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
    
    
        World J Gastroenterol. Oct 21, 2008; 14(39): 6030-6035
Published online Oct 21, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.6030
Published online Oct 21, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.6030
            Table 1 Patient profiles and the endoscopic findings in the patients with normal esophageal motility and ineffective esophageal motility n (%)
        
    | Normal (n = 264) | IEM (n = 195) | P value | |
| Age (yr, mean ± SD) | 50.8 ± 11.1 | 51.1 ± 12.0 | 0.782 | 
| Gender (men/women) | 99/165 | 87/108 | 0.125 | 
| BMI (kg/m2, mean ± SD) | 23.6 ± 2.7 | 23.2 ± 2.7 | 0.393 | 
| Alcohol intake | 58 (22.0) | 31 (15.9) | 0.104 | 
| Smoking | 43 (16.3) | 19 (9.7) | 0.043 | 
| Heartburn/acid regurgitation1 | 128 (48.5) | 104 (53.3) | 0.304 | 
| Indication for pH monitoring | 0.542 | ||
| Globus | 118 (44.7) | 88 (45.1) | |
| Hoarseness | 63 (23.9) | 35 (17.9) | |
| Cough | 27 (10.2) | 24 (12.3) | |
| Sore throat | 30 (11.4) | 28 (14.4) | |
| Others2 | 26 (9.8) | 20 (10.3) | |
| Reflux esophagitis3 | 30 (11.4) | 30 (15.4) | 0.206 | 
| A | 22 | 16 | |
| B | 7 | 11 | |
| C | 1 | 2 | |
| D | 0 | 1 | |
| Hiatal hernia | 17 (6.4) | 10 (5.1) | 0.555 | 
| Endoscopically suspected esophageal metaplasia | 23 (8.7) | 11 (5.6) | 0.214 | 
            Table 2 Results of the lower esophageal sphincter and ambulatory 24-h dual probe pH monitoring in the patients with normal esophageal motility and ineffective esophageal motility
        
    | Normal (n = 264) | IEM (n = 195) | P value | |
| Lower esophageal sphincter | |||
| Pressure | 21.4 ± 0.5 | 18.6 ± 0.5 | < 0.001 | 
| Length | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 0.921 | 
| Proximal probe | |||
| Time pH < 4 (total) (%) | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.225 | 
| Time pH < 4 (upright) (%) | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.230 | 
| Time pH < 4 (supine) (%) | 0.1 ± 0.0 | 0.6 ± 0.4 | 0.214 | 
| No. of reflux episodes | 8.7 ± 1.0 | 12.2 ± 2.6 | 0.219 | 
| Distal probe | |||
| Time pH < 4 (total) (%) | 2.9 ± 0.2 | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 0.185 | 
| Time pH < 4 (upright) (%) | 4.8 ± 0.7 | 5.0 ± 0.5 | 0.827 | 
| Time pH < 4 (supine) (%) | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 0.564 | 
| No. of reflux episodes | 44.1 ± 2.5 | 47.8 ± 4.0 | 0.430 | 
| No. of reflux episodes ≥ 5 min | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± 0.3 | 0.116 | 
| Longest reflux episode (min) | 8.6 ± 0.8 | 10.2 ± 1.0 | 0.199 | 
| DeMeester composite score | 12.1 ± 0.9 | 14.1 ± 1.3 | 0.217 | 
            Table 3 Distribution of the patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and/or gastropharyngeal reflux disease, as defined by ambulatory pH monitoring, in the patients with normal esophageal motility and ineffective esophageal motility n (%)
        
    | Normal (n = 264) | IEM (n = 195) | |
| GERD and GPRD | 108 (40.9) | 74 (37.9) | 
| GPRD only | 56 (21.2) | 33 (16.9) | 
| GERD only | 19 (7.2) | 18 (9.2) | 
| Normal | 81 (30.7) | 70 (35.9) | 
- Citation: Kim KY, Kim GH, Kim DU, Wang SG, Lee BJ, Lee JC, Park DY, Song GA. Is ineffective esophageal motility associated with gastropharyngeal reflux disease? World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(39): 6030-6035
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v14/i39/6030.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.6030

 
         
                         
                 
                 
                 
                 
         
                         
                         
                        