Copyright
        ©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
    
    
        World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2008; 14(38): 5789-5796
Published online Oct 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.5789
Published online Oct 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.5789
            Table 1 The different components of previously used definitions of pancreatic fistula and the new grading system used by the International Study Group for Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF)
        
    | Commonly used definitions used prior to the ISGPF recommendations | ||||
| Output > 10 mL/d of amylase rich fluid on post-operative day 5 or for > 5 d. | ||||
| Output > 10 mL/d of amylase rich fluid on post-operative day 8 or for > 8 d. | ||||
| Output between 25 mL/d and 100 mL/d of amylase rich fluid after post-operative day 8 or for > 8 d. | ||||
| Output > 50 mL/d of amylase rich fluid after post-operative day 11 or for > 11 d. | ||||
| ISGPF Definition: “Output via an operatively placed drain (or a subsequently placed percutaneous drain) of any measurable volume of drain fluid on or after postoperative d 3, with an amylase content greater than 3 times the upper normal serum value” | ||||
| Grade A | “Transient fistula” | No clinical impact | No peri-pancreatic collections on CT scan; little/no change in management | Clinically well; no sepsis; no prolongation of hospital stay; slow removal of operatively placed drains | 
| Grade B | Clinical impact | Peri-pancreatic drains in place or repositioned to drain collections; Change in management is required | Clinically fairly well; degree of infection requiring specific treatment; prolongation of hospital stay; patients often discharged with drains in situ and observed in outpatient setting | |
| Grade C | Severe clinical impact | Worrisome peri-pancreatic collections that require percutaneous drains; major change in management usually in ICU setting; possible re-surgery to salvage a difficult situation (completion pancreatectomy etc) | Clinically unwell; associated sepsis requiring aggressive antibiotics, octreotide and other intensive care support; major prolongation of hospital stay; associated complications and possibility of mortality | |
            Table 2 Pancreatic anastomotic failure (PAF) as described by Strasberg et al
        
    | Definition: “Drainage of greater than 50 mL amylase-rich fluid (> 3-fold elevation above upper limit of normal in serum) per day through the drains on or after postoperative d 10, or pancreatic anastomotic disruption shown radiographically” | ||
| Grade 1 | Deviation from normal postoperative course without pharmacologic, endoscopic, surgical or radiologic intervention (certain drugs allowed) | |
| Grade 2 | Pharmacologic treatment needed. Includes blood transfusions and total parenteral nutrition | |
| Grade 3 (a/b) | Surgical, endoscopic or interventional radiologic treatment needed | |
| a: Not under general anesthesia | b: Under general anesthesia | |
| Grade 4 (a/b) | Life threatening complications and organ dysfunction | |
| a: Single organ | b: Multi-organ | |
| Grade 5 | Death due to PAF | |
- Citation: Shrikhande SV, D’Souza MA. Pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: Evolving definitions, preventive strategies and modern management. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(38): 5789-5796
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v14/i38/5789.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.5789

 
         
                         
                 
                 
                 
                 
         
                         
                         
                        