Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2008; 14(2): 286-291
Published online Jan 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.286
Table 1 Characteristics of the study population
Male (%)120/172 (69.8)
Mean age (yr)47.5 ± 13.54
Child-Pugh-Turcott score (%)
A20 (11.6)
B54 (31.4)
C98 (57)
Serum creatine (mg/dL) (%)
≤ 1.5132 (76.7)
> 1.540 (23.3)
MELD score (mean ± SD)20.9 ± 10.87
MELD: Median (extreme)19.5 [3-66]
Etiology (%)
Virus B78 (45.3)
Virus C17 (10)
Both alcohol and virus B or C41 (23.8)
Unknown36 (20.9)
Table 2 Relationship between mortality and parameters
ParametersMortality
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Death (%)PHazard ratio (95% CI); P
Age (yr)1
≤ 4823.900.023
> 4840.00
Gender
Female15.400.003
Male38.301.8 [0.96 - 3.24]; P = 0.07
Child-Pugh-Turcott
A-B21.600.016
C38.803.3 [1.7 - 6.2]; P < 0.001
Serum creatine (mg/dL)
≤ 1.524.20< 0.001
> 1.555.002.5 [1.4 - 4.3]; P = 0.001
MELD2
≤ 2125.500.030
> 2141.902.9 [1.63 - 5.21]; P < 0.001
Aetiology
Virus B or C32.900.670
Both alcohol and virus340.20
Unknown36.80
Table 3 Stepwise evaluation to find out the optimal cutoff point for both CPT and MELD score (%)
SensitivitySpecificityPositive predictive valueNegative predictive value
CPT score
896.3020.3035.6092.30
974.0033.0033.6073.60
10170.4049.2038.8078.40
1166.7052.6039.1077.50
1259.3057.6039.0075.60
MELD score
1955.6052.5034.9072.10
2055.6057.6037.5073.90
21248.2069.5041.2074.60
2244.0069.5040.0073.20
2344.4076.3046.2075.00
Table 4 Comparison between The Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the CPT score and the MELD score in predicting survival at 3, 6 mo
SurvivalPronostic scoreAUC (95% CI)P
At 3 moCPT0.72 (0.64-0.80)0.68
MELD0.75 (0.62-0.88)
At 6 moCPT0.64 (0.54-0.74)0.67
MELD0.62 (0.49-0.74)
At 12 moCPT0.69 (0.60-0.78)0.38
MELD0.64 (0.53-0.75)