Copyright
©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2008; 14(2): 286-291
Published online Jan 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.286
Published online Jan 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.286
Table 1 Characteristics of the study population
| Male (%) | 120/172 (69.8) | |
| Mean age (yr) | 47.5 ± 13.54 | |
| Child-Pugh-Turcott score (%) | ||
| A | 20 (11.6) | |
| B | 54 (31.4) | |
| C | 98 (57) | |
| Serum creatine (mg/dL) (%) | ||
| ≤ 1.5 | 132 (76.7) | |
| > 1.5 | 40 (23.3) | |
| MELD score (mean ± SD) | 20.9 ± 10.87 | |
| MELD: Median (extreme) | 19.5 [3-66] | |
| Etiology (%) | ||
| Virus B | 78 (45.3) | |
| Virus C | 17 (10) | |
| Both alcohol and virus B or C | 41 (23.8) | |
| Unknown | 36 (20.9) |
Table 2 Relationship between mortality and parameters
| Parameters | Mortality | ||
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
| Death (%) | P | Hazard ratio (95% CI); P | |
| Age (yr)1 | |||
| ≤ 48 | 23.90 | 0.023 | |
| > 48 | 40.00 | ||
| Gender | |||
| Female | 15.40 | 0.003 | |
| Male | 38.30 | 1.8 [0.96 - 3.24]; P = 0.07 | |
| Child-Pugh-Turcott | |||
| A-B | 21.60 | 0.016 | |
| C | 38.80 | 3.3 [1.7 - 6.2]; P < 0.001 | |
| Serum creatine (mg/dL) | |||
| ≤ 1.5 | 24.20 | < 0.001 | |
| > 1.5 | 55.00 | 2.5 [1.4 - 4.3]; P = 0.001 | |
| MELD2 | |||
| ≤ 21 | 25.50 | 0.030 | |
| > 21 | 41.90 | 2.9 [1.63 - 5.21]; P < 0.001 | |
| Aetiology | |||
| Virus B or C | 32.90 | 0.670 | |
| Both alcohol and virus3 | 40.20 | ||
| Unknown | 36.80 | ||
Table 3 Stepwise evaluation to find out the optimal cutoff point for both CPT and MELD score (%)
| Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value | |
| CPT score | ||||
| 8 | 96.30 | 20.30 | 35.60 | 92.30 |
| 9 | 74.00 | 33.00 | 33.60 | 73.60 |
| 101 | 70.40 | 49.20 | 38.80 | 78.40 |
| 11 | 66.70 | 52.60 | 39.10 | 77.50 |
| 12 | 59.30 | 57.60 | 39.00 | 75.60 |
| MELD score | ||||
| 19 | 55.60 | 52.50 | 34.90 | 72.10 |
| 20 | 55.60 | 57.60 | 37.50 | 73.90 |
| 212 | 48.20 | 69.50 | 41.20 | 74.60 |
| 22 | 44.00 | 69.50 | 40.00 | 73.20 |
| 23 | 44.40 | 76.30 | 46.20 | 75.00 |
Table 4 Comparison between The Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the CPT score and the MELD score in predicting survival at 3, 6 mo
| Survival | Pronostic score | AUC (95% CI) | P |
| At 3 mo | CPT | 0.72 (0.64-0.80) | 0.68 |
| MELD | 0.75 (0.62-0.88) | ||
| At 6 mo | CPT | 0.64 (0.54-0.74) | 0.67 |
| MELD | 0.62 (0.49-0.74) | ||
| At 12 mo | CPT | 0.69 (0.60-0.78) | 0.38 |
| MELD | 0.64 (0.53-0.75) |
- Citation: Attia K, Ackoundou-N’guessan K, N’dri-yoman A, Mahassadi A, Messou E, Bathaix Y, Kissi Y. Child-Pugh-Turcott versus Meld score for predicting survival in a retrospective cohort of black African cirrhotic patients. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(2): 286-291
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v14/i2/286.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.286
