Copyright
©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 14, 2008; 14(10): 1514-1520
Published online Mar 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.1514
Published online Mar 14, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.1514
Table 1 Patient characteristics and baseline cardiovascular parameters in each group (mean ± SD)
Groups | o-ERCP | n-ERCP | P-value |
Number of patients | 25 | 25 | |
Male/Female | 17/8 | 17/8 | 0.76 |
Median age (range) | 69 (32-89) | 74 (35-85) | 0.07 |
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 129 ± 20 | 133 ± 19 | 0.50 |
Pulse rate (/min) | 71 ± 12 | 65 ± 11 | 0.08 |
SpO2 (%) | 99 ± 1.6 | 98 ± 1.6 | 0.35 |
Indication for ERCP (n) | |||
Cholecyst lithiasis | 6 | 2 | |
Choledochus lithiasis | 11 | 10 | |
Cancer | 6 | 10 | 0.50 |
Pancreatitis | 1 | 2 | |
Others | 1 | 1 |
Table 2 Esophagogastroduodenoscopy prior to ERCP and its diagnosis
Groups | o-ERCP | n-ERCP |
Number of patients | 25 | 25 |
EGD prior to ERCP | 25 | 0 |
Diagnosis | ||
Normal finding | 8 | 10 |
Pathological findings | 17 | 15 |
Reflux esophagitis | 1 | 2 |
Sliding hernia | 4 | 2 |
Esophageal diverticulum | 1 | 0 |
Atrophic gastritis | 10 | 11 |
Duodenal ulcer scar | 1 | 4 |
Gastric adenoma | 1 | 1 |
Gastric SMT | 0 | 1 |
Table 3 Successful rates of cannulation and endoscopic naso-biliary drainage and rates of post-ERCP hyperamylasemia in each group
Groups | o-ERCP | n-ERCP | P-value |
Successful cannulation (%) | |||
Either of the ducts | 25/25 | 23/25 | 0.510 |
(100) | (92) | ||
Common bile duct | 24/25 | 18/25 | 0.053 |
(96) | (72) | ||
Pancreatic duct | 24/25 | 21/23 | 0.940 |
(96) | (91) | ||
Median time for cannulation, min (%) | 8 | 7 | 0.590 |
(2-24) | (4-20) | ||
Post-procedural hyperamylasemia (%) | 7/25 | 5/23 | 0.870 |
(28) | (22) | ||
Successful ENBD (%) | 20/21 | 13/15 | 0.340 |
(95) | (87) |
Table 4 Rates and times required for successful cannulation in each pattern of the endoscopic shape
Patterns | C | U | J | Total |
Successful cannulation (%) | ||||
Either of the ducts | 6 | 14 | 3 | 23 |
Common bile duct | 6/6 | 9/14 | 3/3 | 18/23 |
(100) | (64) | (100) | (78) | |
Pancreatic duct | 5/5 | 14/14 | 2/2 | 21/21 |
(100) | (100) | (100) | (100) | |
Median time for cannulation, min (%) | ||||
Either of the ducts | 6.5 | 7.3 | 7 | 7 |
(5-8) | (4-20) | (4-14) | (4-20) | |
Common bile duct | 10.5 | 20 | 16 | 17 |
(8-37) | (7-35.5) | (6-19) | (6-37) | |
Pancreatic duct | 6 | 13 | 6 | 9 |
(5-8) | (6-26) | (5-7) | (5-26) | |
Termination | 31 | 34 | 24 | 33 |
(14-38) | (11-61) | (12-34) | (11-61) |
- Citation: Mori A, Ohashi N, Maruyama T, Tatebe H, Sakai K, Shibuya T, Inoue H, Takegoshi S, Okuno M. Transnasal endoscopic retrograde chalangiopancreatography using an ultrathin endoscope: A prospective comparison with a routine oral procedure. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14(10): 1514-1520
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v14/i10/1514.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.1514